Impact of clinical features on the efficacy of osimertinib therapy in patients with T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer and acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
EGFR-TKI
Lung cancer
Threonine790Methionine
epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)
osimertinib
Journal
Journal of thoracic disease
ISSN: 2072-1439
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Dis
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101533916
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
entrez:
3
8
2019
pubmed:
3
8
2019
medline:
3
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Osimertinib exhibits good efficacy in patients with T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Compared with the clinical trials, in real-world clinical practice, osimertinib must be administered to older patients and those with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS). Therefore, we investigated the association between osimertinib efficacy/safety and PS score, age, and other clinical features in patients with T790M-positive NSCLC. We reviewed all patients with T790M-positive NSCLC and acquired resistance to initial EGFR-TKIs who were administered osimertinib between March 2016 and January 2018 at the Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center in Komagome Hospital, Japan. In total, 31 patients, including 8 young (<65 years) and 23 elderly (≥65 years) patients, were included in the study. Of these, 10 (32.3%) patients had poor PS scores. The progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly shorter in young patients was than elderly patients [3.5 Poor ECOG-PS and younger age were associated with lower efficacy of osimertinib in T790M-positive NSCLC.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Osimertinib exhibits good efficacy in patients with T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Compared with the clinical trials, in real-world clinical practice, osimertinib must be administered to older patients and those with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS). Therefore, we investigated the association between osimertinib efficacy/safety and PS score, age, and other clinical features in patients with T790M-positive NSCLC.
METHODS
METHODS
We reviewed all patients with T790M-positive NSCLC and acquired resistance to initial EGFR-TKIs who were administered osimertinib between March 2016 and January 2018 at the Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center in Komagome Hospital, Japan.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In total, 31 patients, including 8 young (<65 years) and 23 elderly (≥65 years) patients, were included in the study. Of these, 10 (32.3%) patients had poor PS scores. The progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly shorter in young patients was than elderly patients [3.5
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Poor ECOG-PS and younger age were associated with lower efficacy of osimertinib in T790M-positive NSCLC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31372272
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.06.03
pii: jtd-11-06-2350
pmc: PMC6626778
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2350-2360Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: Y Hosomi, Y Okuma, K Kubota, M Seike and A Gemma have received honoraria from AstraZeneca. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Cancer Res. 2005 Aug 15;65(16):7096-101
pubmed: 16103058
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 1;24(16):2549-56
pubmed: 16735708
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar 20;27(9):1394-400
pubmed: 19224850
Clin Lung Cancer. 2009 Jul;10(4):281-9
pubmed: 19632948
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 24;362(25):2380-8
pubmed: 20573926
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):239-46
pubmed: 22285168
Lung Cancer. 2013 Oct;82(1):109-14
pubmed: 23910906
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):213-22
pubmed: 24439929
Lung Cancer. 2014 May;84(2):196-202
pubmed: 24629638
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 30;372(18):1689-99
pubmed: 25923549
PLoS One. 2015 May 08;10(5):e0123587
pubmed: 25955322
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 1;34(28):3375-82
pubmed: 27354477
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Dec;17(12):1643-1652
pubmed: 27751847
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 May 1;23(9):2195-2202
pubmed: 27780855
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):629-640
pubmed: 27959700
Clin Exp Med. 2018 Feb;18(1):15-20
pubmed: 28391544
Oncologist. 2017 Sep;22(9):1075-1083
pubmed: 28507206
ERJ Open Res. 2017 Jul 12;3(3):null
pubmed: 28717642
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Nov;18(11):1454-1466
pubmed: 28958502
Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 17;8(41):71358-71370
pubmed: 29050366
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 11;378(2):113-125
pubmed: 29151359
Lung Cancer. 2018 Mar;117:1-6
pubmed: 29496249
Lung Cancer. 2018 Mar;117:14-19
pubmed: 29496250
Am J Transl Res. 2018 Mar 15;10(3):892-900
pubmed: 29636879
Cancer Sci. 2018 Jun;109(6):1930-1938
pubmed: 29697876
Lung Cancer. 2018 Jul;121:5-11
pubmed: 29858027