Fracture prediction from self-reported falls in routine clinical practice: a registry-based cohort study.
Absorptiometry, Photon
Accidental Falls
/ statistics & numerical data
Adult
Aged
Bone Density
Cohort Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Manitoba
/ epidemiology
Middle Aged
Osteoporosis
/ epidemiology
Osteoporotic Fractures
/ diagnostic imaging
Proportional Hazards Models
Registries
Risk Assessment
/ methods
Risk Factors
Self Report
/ statistics & numerical data
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
FRAX
Falls
Fractures
Osteoporosis
Journal
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
ISSN: 1433-2965
Titre abrégé: Osteoporos Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9100105
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
28
05
2019
accepted:
21
07
2019
pubmed:
3
8
2019
medline:
17
6
2020
entrez:
3
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A simple question construct regarding number of falls in the previous year, ascertained by a single question, was strongly associated with incident fractures in routine clinical practice using a population-based dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) registry. There is conflicting evidence from research cohorts that falls independently increase fracture risk. We examined the independent effects of falls on subsequent fractures in a large clinical registry of bone mineral density (BMD) results for the Province of Manitoba, Canada that has been systematically collecting self-reported falls information since September 1, 2012. The study population consisted of 24,943 women and men aged 40 years and older (mean age 65.5 ± 10.2 years) with fracture probability assessment (FRAX), self-reported falls for the previous year (categorized as none, 1, 2, or > 3) and fracture outcomes. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95 confidence intervals (CI) for time to fracture were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. During mean observation time of 2.7 ± 1.0 years, 863 (3.5%) sustained one or more major osteoporotic fractures (MOF), 212 (0.8%) sustained a hip fracture, and 1210 (4.9%) sustained any incident fracture. Compared with no falls in the previous year (referent), there was a gradient of increasing risk for fracture with increasing number of falls (all P < 0.001). Results showed minimal attenuation with covariate adjustment. When adjusted for baseline fracture probability (FRAX score with BMD) the HR for MOF increased from 1.49 (95% CI 1.25-1.78) for one fall to 1.74 (1.33-2.27) for two falls to 2.62 (2.06-3.34) for ≥ 3 falls. HRs were similar for any incident fracture and slightly greater for prediction of hip fracture, reaching 3.41 (95% CI 2.19-5.31) for ≥ 3 previous falls. Self-report number of falls in the previous year is strongly associated with incident fracture risk in the routine clinical practice setting, and this risk is independent of age, sex, BMD, and baseline fracture probability. Moreover, there is dose-response with multiple falls (up to a maximum of 3) conferring greater risk than a single fall.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31372711
doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05106-3
pii: 10.1007/s00198-019-05106-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2195-2203Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UP_A620_1015
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/P020941/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_U147585819
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12011/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_U147585827
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Versus Arthritis
ID : 17702
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_U147585824
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
J Clin Densitom. 2005 Spring;8(1):25-30
pubmed: 15722584
CMAJ. 2011 Feb 8;183(2):E107-14
pubmed: 21173069
J Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;43(1):26-33
pubmed: 26628597
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Oct 1;187(10):2243-2251
pubmed: 29912266
J Clin Densitom. 2003 Fall;6(3):275-82
pubmed: 14514998
BMC Public Health. 2012 May 18;12:301
pubmed: 22537071
Bone. 2009 May;44(5):734-43
pubmed: 19195497
Osteoporos Int. 2008 Oct;19(10):1431-44
pubmed: 18324342
J Clin Densitom. 2011 Jul-Sep;14(3):194-204
pubmed: 21810525
J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Aug;34(8):1428-1435
pubmed: 31069862
J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Mar;33(3):510-516
pubmed: 29220072
Osteoporos Int. 1998;8(5):468-89
pubmed: 9850356
Arch Osteoporos. 2016 Dec;11(1):25
pubmed: 27465509
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Oct;28(10):2935-2944
pubmed: 28668994
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Mar;22(3):829-37
pubmed: 21161508
BMJ. 2012 May 22;344:e3427
pubmed: 22619194
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):149-161
pubmed: 27477031
J Osteoporos. 2012;2012:528790
pubmed: 22934235
Osteoporos Int. 2007 Aug;18(8):1109-17
pubmed: 17370100
Lancet. 2019 Jan 26;393(10169):364-376
pubmed: 30696576
J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Jun;34(6):1095-1100
pubmed: 30690793
Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(7):519-28
pubmed: 11527048
J Bone Miner Res. 2016 Sep;31(9):1753-9
pubmed: 27061748
Osteoporos Int. 2009 Dec;20(12):2055-61
pubmed: 19436939
J Bone Miner Res. 2010 Nov;25(11):2350-8
pubmed: 20499367
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Feb;29(2):355-363
pubmed: 29067485
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Jan;27(1):267-74
pubmed: 26391036
N Engl J Med. 1995 Mar 23;332(12):767-73
pubmed: 7862179
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Mar;22(3):817-27
pubmed: 21161509
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Sep;22(9):2395-411
pubmed: 21779818