A retrospective study of implants placed following 1-stage or 2-stage maxillary sinus floor augmentation by the lateral window technique performed on residual bone of <4 mm: Results up to 10 years of follow-up.
dental implants
retrospective studies
sinus floor augmentation
Journal
Journal of periodontology
ISSN: 1943-3670
Titre abrégé: J Periodontol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8000345
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
received:
01
02
2019
revised:
10
05
2019
accepted:
16
05
2019
pubmed:
3
8
2019
medline:
3
7
2020
entrez:
3
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to compare the survival rates of implants placed following 1-stage or 2-stage maxillary sinus floor augmentation by the lateral window technique (SFALW) performed on residual bone of <4 mm. This study was conducted based on dental records and radiographs obtained from patients who received SFALW from March 2006 to June 2014, being followed up between March 2006 and December 2017. They were divided into 1-stage and 2-stage groups according to the SFALW performed. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate whether a significant difference existed between 1-stage and 2-stage SFALW in terms of survival rates. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine the influence of multiple variables on implant failure. A total of 395 implants (156 implants in the 1-stage group, 239 implants in the 2-stage group) in 167 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among them, 13 implants (five implants in the 1-stage group, eight implants in the 2-stage group) failed. No significant difference was found in the 10-year cumulative survival rate of implants between the 1-stage group and the 2-stage group (96.8% and 92.5%, respectively, P = 0.656). Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that implant failure was significantly influenced by implant length and functional time following prosthetic loading. The 10-year cumulative survival rates showed no statistically significant difference between implants following 1-stage and 2-stage maxillary SFALW performed on residual bone height of <4 mm.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to compare the survival rates of implants placed following 1-stage or 2-stage maxillary sinus floor augmentation by the lateral window technique (SFALW) performed on residual bone of <4 mm.
METHODS
This study was conducted based on dental records and radiographs obtained from patients who received SFALW from March 2006 to June 2014, being followed up between March 2006 and December 2017. They were divided into 1-stage and 2-stage groups according to the SFALW performed. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate whether a significant difference existed between 1-stage and 2-stage SFALW in terms of survival rates. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine the influence of multiple variables on implant failure.
RESULTS
A total of 395 implants (156 implants in the 1-stage group, 239 implants in the 2-stage group) in 167 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among them, 13 implants (five implants in the 1-stage group, eight implants in the 2-stage group) failed. No significant difference was found in the 10-year cumulative survival rate of implants between the 1-stage group and the 2-stage group (96.8% and 92.5%, respectively, P = 0.656). Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that implant failure was significantly influenced by implant length and functional time following prosthetic loading.
CONCLUSIONS
The 10-year cumulative survival rates showed no statistically significant difference between implants following 1-stage and 2-stage maxillary SFALW performed on residual bone height of <4 mm.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31372997
doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0066
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
183-193Informations de copyright
© 2019 American Academy of Periodontology.
Références
Marcus SE, Drury TF, Brown LJ, et al. Tooth retention and tooth loss in the permanent dentition of adults: United States, 1988-1991. J Dent Res. 1996;75:684-695.
Cahen PM, Frank RM, Turlot JC. A survey of the reasons for dental extractions in France. J Dent Res. 1985;64:1087-1093.
Ohba T, Langlais RP, Morimoto Y, et al. Maxillary sinus floor in edentulous and dentate patients. Indian J Dent Res. 2001;12:121-125.
Sharan A, Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: a radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:48-56.
Liu R, Yan M, Chen S, et al. Effectiveness of platelet-rich fibrin as an adjunctive material to bone graft in maxillary sinus augmentation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:7267062.
Raja SV. Management of the posterior maxilla with sinus lift: review of techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:1730-1734.
Caudry S, Landzberg M. Lateral window sinus elevation technique: managing challenges and complications. J Can Dent Assoc. 2013;79:d101.
Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, et al. Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13(suppl):11-45.
Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(suppl):237-259.
Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M. Methods to treat the edentulous posterior maxilla: implants with sinus grafting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:867-871.
Kahnberg KE, Vannas-Lofqvist L. Sinus lift procedure using a 2-stage surgical technique: I. Clinical and radiographic report up to 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:876-884.
Lambert F, Lecloux G, Rompen E. One-step approach for implant placement and subantral bone regeneration using bovine hydroxyapatite: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:598-606.
Fugazzotto PA, Vlassis J. Long-term success of sinus augmentation using various surgical approaches and grafting materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:52-58.
Kim YS, Kim SH, Kim KH, et al. Rabbit maxillary sinus augmentation model with simultaneous implant placement: differential responses to the graft materials. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2012;42:204-211.
Alghamdi HS. Methods to improve osseointegration of dental implants in low quality (type-IV) bone: an overview. J Funct Biomater. 2018;9:pii: E7.
Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Coelho PG, Kang BS, et al. Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography. Trends Biotechnol. 2010;28:198-206.
Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part 1-review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:536-543.
Mendonca G, Mendonca DB, Aragao FJ, et al. Advancing dental implant surface technology-from micron- to nanotopography. Biomaterials. 2008;29:3822-3835.
Abraham CM. A brief historical perspective on dental implants, their surface coatings and treatments. Open Dent J. 2014;8:50-55.
Shibata Y, Tanimoto Y. A review of improved fixation methods for dental implants. Part I: surface optimization for rapid osseointegration. J Prosthodont Res. 2015;59:20-33.
Schneider GB, Perinpanayagam H, Clegg M, et al. Implant surface roughness affects osteoblast gene expression. J Dent Res. 2003;82:372-376.
Bortoluzzi MC, Manfro R, Fabris V, et al. Comparative study of immediately inserted dental implants in sinus lift: 24 months of follow-up. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2014;4:30-33.
Peleg M, Garg AK, Mazor Z. Predictability of simultaneous implant placement in the severely atrophic posterior maxilla: a 9-year longitudinal experience study of 2132 implants placed into 731 human sinus grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:94-102.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335:806-808.
Del Fabbro M, Wallace SS, Testori T. Long-term implant survival in the grafted maxillary sinus: a systematic review. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33:773-783.
Jurisic M, Markovic A, Radulovic M, et al. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: comparing osteotome with lateral window immediate and delayed implant placements. An interim report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:820-827.
Felice P, Pistilli R, Piattelli M, et al. 1-stage versus 2-stage lateral sinus lift procedures: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7:65-75.
Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, et al. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:216-240.
Ardekian L, Oved-Peleg E, Mactei EE, et al. The clinical significance of sinus membrane perforation during augmentation of the maxillary sinus. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:277-282.
Jung UW, Unursaikhan O, Park JY, et al. Tenting effect of the elevated sinus membrane over an implant with adjunctive use of a hydroxyapatite-powdered collagen membrane in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:663-670.
Hong JY, Lee JS, Pang EK, et al. Impact of different synthetic bone fillers on healing of extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:e30-e37.
Lioubavina-Hack N, Lang NP, Karring T. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:244-250.
Javed F, Ahmed HB, Crespi R, et al. Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: factors of influence and evaluation. Interv Med Appl Sci. 2013;5:162-167.
Cobo-Vazquez C, Reininger D, Molinero-Mourelle P, et al. Effect of the lack of primary stability in the survival of dental implants. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10:e14-e19.
Sgaramella N, Tartaro G, D'Amato S, et al. Displacement of dental implants into the maxillary sinus: a retrospective study of twenty-one patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18:62-72.