Chronic Toxicities of Neonicotinoids to Nymphs of the Common New Zealand Mayfly Deleatidium spp.


Journal

Environmental toxicology and chemistry
ISSN: 1552-8618
Titre abrégé: Environ Toxicol Chem
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8308958

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2019
Historique:
received: 20 02 2019
revised: 19 03 2019
accepted: 31 07 2019
pubmed: 3 8 2019
medline: 18 4 2020
entrez: 3 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Neonicotinoid insecticides have been shown to have high chronic toxicity relative to acute toxicity, and therefore short-term toxicity tests ≤96 h in duration may underestimate their environmental risks. Among nontarget aquatic invertebrates, insects of the orders Diptera and Ephemeroptera have been found to be the most sensitive to neonicotinoids. To undertake a more accurate assessment of the risks posed by neonicotinoids to freshwater ecosystems, more data are needed from long-term tests employing the most sensitive taxa. Using nymphs of the common New Zealand mayfly genus Deleatidium spp., we performed 28-d static-renewal exposures with the widely used neonicotinoids imidacloprid, clothianidin, and thiamethoxam. We monitored survival, immobility, impairment, and mayfly moulting propensity at varying time points throughout the experiment. Imidacloprid and clothianidin exerted strong chronic toxicity effects on Deleatidium nymphs, with 28-d median lethal concentrations (LC50s) of 0.28 and 1.36 µg/L, respectively, whereas thiamethoxam was the least toxic, with a 28-d LC50 > 4 µg/L (highest concentration tested). Mayfly moulting propensity was also negatively affected by clothianidin (during 3 of 4 wk), imidacloprid (2 of 4 wk), and thiamethoxam (1 of 4 wk). Comparisons with published neonicotinoid chronic toxicity data for other mayfly taxa and larvae of the midge genus Chironomus showed similar sensitivities for mayflies and midges, suggesting that experiments using these taxa provide reliable assessments of the threats of neonicotinoids to the most vulnerable freshwater species. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:2459-2471. © 2019 SETAC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31373707
doi: 10.1002/etc.4556
doi:

Substances chimiques

Guanidines 0
Insecticides 0
Neonicotinoids 0
Nitro Compounds 0
Thiazoles 0
Water Pollutants, Chemical 0
clothianidin 2V9906ABKQ
imidacloprid 3BN7M937V8
Thiamethoxam 747IC8B487

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2459-2471

Informations de copyright

© 2019 SETAC.

Auteurs

Samuel J Macaulay (SJ)

Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand.

Kimberly J Hageman (KJ)

Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.

Robert E Alumbaugh (RE)

Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.

Sean M Lyons (SM)

Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.

Jeremy J Piggott (JJ)

Department of Zoology, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Christoph D Matthaei (CD)

Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH