Bayesian hypothesis testing and experimental design for two-photon imaging data.
Animals
Bayes Theorem
Calcium Signaling
Computational Biology
Glutamic Acid
/ physiology
Heuristics
In Vitro Techniques
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Mice, Transgenic
Microscopy, Fluorescence, Multiphoton
/ statistics & numerical data
Models, Neurological
Models, Statistical
Neurons
/ physiology
Normal Distribution
Photic Stimulation
Regression Analysis
Retina
/ physiology
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Uncertainty
Journal
PLoS computational biology
ISSN: 1553-7358
Titre abrégé: PLoS Comput Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101238922
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
received:
09
09
2018
accepted:
20
06
2019
revised:
14
08
2019
pubmed:
3
8
2019
medline:
21
1
2020
entrez:
3
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Variability, stochastic or otherwise, is a central feature of neural activity. Yet the means by which estimates of variation and uncertainty are derived from noisy observations of neural activity is often heuristic, with more weight given to numerical convenience than statistical rigour. For two-photon imaging data, composed of fundamentally probabilistic streams of photon detections, the problem is particularly acute. Here, we present a statistical pipeline for the inference and analysis of neural activity using Gaussian Process regression, applied to two-photon recordings of light-driven activity in ex vivo mouse retina. We demonstrate the flexibility and extensibility of these models, considering cases with non-stationary statistics, driven by complex parametric stimuli, in signal discrimination, hierarchical clustering and other inference tasks. Sparse approximation methods allow these models to be fitted rapidly, permitting them to actively guide the design of light stimulation in the midst of ongoing two-photon experiments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31374071
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007205
pii: PCOMPBIOL-D-18-01550
pmc: PMC6693774
doi:
Substances chimiques
Glutamic Acid
3KX376GY7L
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1007205Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023 Sep 1;9:e1516
pubmed: 37705656
Nat Methods. 2013 Feb;10(2):162-70
pubmed: 23314171
J Neurosci. 2013 Jul 3;33(27):10972-85
pubmed: 23825403
Biophys J. 2013 Jan 8;104(1):51-62
pubmed: 23332058
Science. 1990 Apr 6;248(4951):73-6
pubmed: 2321027
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Apr;9(4):292-303
pubmed: 18319728
Neural Comput. 2014 Aug;26(8):1519-41
pubmed: 24877730
J Neurophysiol. 2011 May;105(5):2601-9
pubmed: 21346205
Pflugers Arch. 2009 Apr;457(6):1393-414
pubmed: 19023590
Nature. 2017 Feb 23;542(7642):439-444
pubmed: 28178238
J Comp Neurol. 1992 Nov 15;325(3):327-42
pubmed: 1447405
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011 Oct;21(5):672-8
pubmed: 21821411
J Stat Softw. 2017;76:
pubmed: 36568334
J Neurosci. 2000 Mar 1;20(5):1941-51
pubmed: 10684895
Neural Comput. 2018 Apr;30(4):1012-1045
pubmed: 29381442
J Physiol. 2005 Jun 1;565(Pt 2):517-35
pubmed: 15760938
J Neurosci Methods. 2010 Apr 30;188(1):141-50
pubmed: 20152860
Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 15;49(4):3057-64
pubmed: 19944173
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
J Physiol. 2013 Jan 1;591(1):303-25
pubmed: 23045347
Nature. 2016 Jan 21;529(7586):345-50
pubmed: 26735013
Nat Neurosci. 2012 Nov;15(11):1581-9
pubmed: 23086336