Validation of an effective implantable pump-infusion system for chronic convection-enhanced delivery of intracerebral topotecan in a large animal model.
CED = convection-enhanced delivery
FVd = final volume of distribution
FVi = final volume infused
GBM = glioblastoma
LCMS = liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy
NBS = neurobehavioral scale
TPT = topotecan
Vd = volume of distribution
Vdmax = maximal volume of distribution
Vi = volume of infusion
blood-brain barrier
central nervous system
convection-enhanced delivery
drug delivery
glioblastoma
malignant gliomas
oncology
topotecan
Journal
Journal of neurosurgery
ISSN: 1933-0693
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0253357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Aug 2019
02 Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
25
01
2019
accepted:
04
03
2019
pubmed:
3
8
2019
medline:
3
8
2019
entrez:
3
8
2019
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Intracerebral convection-enhanced delivery (CED) has been limited to short durations due to a reliance on externalized catheters. Preclinical studies investigating topotecan (TPT) CED for glioma have suggested that prolonged infusion improves survival. Internalized pump-catheter systems may facilitate chronic infusion. The authors describe the safety and utility of long-term TPT CED in a porcine model and correlation of drug distribution through coinfusion of gadolinium. Fully internalized CED pump-catheter systems were implanted in 12 pigs. Infusion algorithms featuring variable infusion schedules, flow rates, and concentrations of a mixture of TPT and gadolinium were characterized over increasing intervals from 4 to 32 days. Therapy distribution was measured using gadolinium signal on MRI as a surrogate. A 9-point neurobehavioral scale (NBS) was used to identify side effects. All animals tolerated infusion without serious adverse events. The average NBS score was 8.99. The average maximum volume of distribution (Vdmax) in chronically infused animals was 11.30 mL and represented 32.73% of the ipsilateral cerebral hemispheric volume. Vdmax was achieved early during infusions and remained relatively stable despite a slight decline as the infusion reached steady state. Novel tissue TPT concentrations measured by liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy correlated with gadolinium signal intensity on MRI (p = 0.0078). Prolonged TPT-gadolinium CED via an internalized system is safe and well tolerated and can achieve a large Vdmax, as well as maintain a stable Vd for up to 32 days. Gadolinium provides an identifiable surrogate for measuring drug distribution. Extended CED is potentially a broadly applicable and safe therapeutic option in select patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31374547
doi: 10.3171/2019.3.JNS1963
pii: 2019.3.JNS1963
pmc: PMC7227320
mid: NIHMS1587020
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1-10Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA161404
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R38 CA231577
Pays : United States
Références
Cancer Res. 2011 Jun 1;71(11):3963-71
pubmed: 21464045
World Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;104:831-840
pubmed: 28454992
Neurosurg Focus. 2006 Apr 15;20(4):E12
pubmed: 16709017
Neurosurgery. 2007 Nov;61(5):1031-7; discussion 1037-8
pubmed: 18091279
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Mar;35(3):498-503
pubmed: 23988756
Neuro Oncol. 2010 Aug;12(8):871-81
pubmed: 20511192
Neurotherapeutics. 2017 Apr;14(2):358-371
pubmed: 28299724
Neuro Oncol. 2011 Jan;13(1):132-42
pubmed: 20980335
Expert Rev Neurother. 2009 Oct;9(10):1519-27
pubmed: 19831841
J Neurosurg. 2005 Feb;102(2):267-75
pubmed: 15739554
J Card Surg. 1994 Sep;9(5):560-74; discussion 575
pubmed: 7994098
J Drug Deliv. 2013;2013:107573
pubmed: 23476784
J Neurooncol. 2011 Jan;101(2):267-77
pubmed: 20563833
Neurosurgery. 2000 Dec;47(6):1391-8; discussion 1398-9
pubmed: 11126910
Neurosurgery. 1998 Apr;42(4):709-20; discussion 720-3
pubmed: 9574634
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2017;15(1):116-128
pubmed: 27306036
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 12;379(2):150-161
pubmed: 29943666
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96
pubmed: 15758009
J Neurosurg. 2012 Aug;117(2):197-203
pubmed: 22606981
J Neurosurg. 2010 Aug;113(2):301-9
pubmed: 20020841
Neurotherapeutics. 2009 Apr;6(2):344-51
pubmed: 19332329
J Neurosurg. 2011 Sep;115(3):463-4; discussion 465-6
pubmed: 21619413
J Neurosurg. 2004 Mar;100(3):472-9
pubmed: 15035283
J Neurosurg. 1987 Jun;66(6):865-74
pubmed: 3033172
J Neurosurg. 2007 Sep;107(3):560-7
pubmed: 17886556
Cytometry A. 2008 Jun;73(6):480-9
pubmed: 18459160
Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008 Aug;4(8):427-35
pubmed: 18628751
J Neurosurg. 2008 May;108(5):989-98
pubmed: 18447717
J Surg Oncol. 1993 Jun;53(2):97-103
pubmed: 8388965
Neurosurgery. 2000 Mar;46(3):683-91
pubmed: 10719865
J Neurosurg. 2015 Mar;122(3):697-706
pubmed: 25397365
Neurosurgery. 2011 Dec;69(6):1272-9; discussion 1279-80
pubmed: 21562434
Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2008 Jan;3(1):2-9
pubmed: 18474010
Cancer. 1999 Mar 1;85(5):1160-5
pubmed: 10091802
Oncologist. 1998;3(1):1-3
pubmed: 10388078
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2013 Mar;11(3):289-95
pubmed: 23240851
J Neurooncol. 2007 May;83(1):97-109
pubmed: 17203397
Neuro Oncol. 2011 Aug;13(8):886-93
pubmed: 21750007
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 15;91(6):2076-80
pubmed: 8134351
Ther Deliv. 2016 Jul;7(7):457-81
pubmed: 27403630
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Mar 1;25(7):837-44
pubmed: 17327604
J Neurooncol. 2003 Oct;65(1):27-35
pubmed: 14649883