The development of the Comprehensive Analysis of Policy on Physical Activity (CAPPA) framework.
Framework
Physical activity
Policy
Policy analysis
Sedentary behaviour
Journal
The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
ISSN: 1479-5868
Titre abrégé: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101217089
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 08 2019
02 08 2019
Historique:
received:
06
01
2019
accepted:
22
07
2019
entrez:
4
8
2019
pubmed:
4
8
2019
medline:
21
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Policy analysis is considered essential for achieving successful reforms in health promotion and public health. The only framework for physical activity (PA) policy analysis was developed at a time when the field of PA policy research was in its early stages. PA policy research has since grown, and our understanding of what elements need to be included in a comprehensive analysis of PA policy is now more refined. This study developed a new conceptual framework for PA policy analysis - the Comprehensive Analysis of Policy on Physical Activity (CAPPA) framework. The development of the CAPPA framework was based on: (i) an extensive review of literature; (ii) an open discussion between the authors; (iii) three rounds of a Delphi process; and (iv) two-rounds of consultations with PA policy stakeholders. The CAPPA framework specifies 38 elements of a comprehensive analysis of PA policies in the following six categories, which comprise the building blocks of the framework: (i) purpose of analysis (including auditing and assessment of policies); (ii) policy level (including: international; national; subnational; local; and institutional policies); (iii) policy sector (including: health; sport; recreation and leisure; education; transport; environment; urban/rural planning and design; tourism; work and employment; public finance; and research sectors); (iv) type of policy (including: formal written policies; unwritten formal statements; written standards and guidelines; formal procedures; and informal policies); (v) stage of policy cycle (including: agenda setting; formulation; endorsement/legitimisation; implementation; evaluation; maintenance; termination; and succession); and (vi) scope of analysis (including availability; context; processes; actors; political will; content; and effects). Based on the CAPPA framework, we also proposed broad and inclusive definitions of PA policy and PA policy analysis. The CAPPA framework may be used to guide future studies related to PA policy and to provide a context for the analysis of its specific components. The framework could be used in the same way for sedentary behaviour policy research. Future research should examine the extent to which PA policy analysis has covered each of the elements specified in the CAPPA framework and analyse the elements for which evidence is lacking. Future studies should also determine whether the existing tools allow for auditing and assessment of all the CAPPA elements and develop new tools if needed to allow for a more comprehensive PA policy analysis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Policy analysis is considered essential for achieving successful reforms in health promotion and public health. The only framework for physical activity (PA) policy analysis was developed at a time when the field of PA policy research was in its early stages. PA policy research has since grown, and our understanding of what elements need to be included in a comprehensive analysis of PA policy is now more refined. This study developed a new conceptual framework for PA policy analysis - the Comprehensive Analysis of Policy on Physical Activity (CAPPA) framework.
METHODS
The development of the CAPPA framework was based on: (i) an extensive review of literature; (ii) an open discussion between the authors; (iii) three rounds of a Delphi process; and (iv) two-rounds of consultations with PA policy stakeholders.
RESULTS
The CAPPA framework specifies 38 elements of a comprehensive analysis of PA policies in the following six categories, which comprise the building blocks of the framework: (i) purpose of analysis (including auditing and assessment of policies); (ii) policy level (including: international; national; subnational; local; and institutional policies); (iii) policy sector (including: health; sport; recreation and leisure; education; transport; environment; urban/rural planning and design; tourism; work and employment; public finance; and research sectors); (iv) type of policy (including: formal written policies; unwritten formal statements; written standards and guidelines; formal procedures; and informal policies); (v) stage of policy cycle (including: agenda setting; formulation; endorsement/legitimisation; implementation; evaluation; maintenance; termination; and succession); and (vi) scope of analysis (including availability; context; processes; actors; political will; content; and effects). Based on the CAPPA framework, we also proposed broad and inclusive definitions of PA policy and PA policy analysis.
CONCLUSION
The CAPPA framework may be used to guide future studies related to PA policy and to provide a context for the analysis of its specific components. The framework could be used in the same way for sedentary behaviour policy research. Future research should examine the extent to which PA policy analysis has covered each of the elements specified in the CAPPA framework and analyse the elements for which evidence is lacking. Future studies should also determine whether the existing tools allow for auditing and assessment of all the CAPPA elements and develop new tools if needed to allow for a more comprehensive PA policy analysis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31375132
doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0822-5
pii: 10.1186/s12966-019-0822-5
pmc: PMC6679550
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
60Références
Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:297-322
pubmed: 16533119
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Mar;52(3 Suppl 3):S224-S227
pubmed: 28215369
Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):219-29
pubmed: 22818936
Am J Public Health. 2007 Nov;97(11):2010-3
pubmed: 17901425
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Oct 24;10:112
pubmed: 24228891
Prev Med. 2018 Jun;111:466-472
pubmed: 29709233
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Feb 01;12:8
pubmed: 25638442
Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 Apr 18;10:14
pubmed: 22512780
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Oct;19(14):2643-53
pubmed: 27034196
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Apr;24(2):428-38
pubmed: 22943209
J Phys Act Health. 2009 Nov;6(6):805-17
pubmed: 20101924
Food Nutr Bull. 2004 Sep;25(3):292-302
pubmed: 15460274
J Phys Act Health. 2014 Feb;11(2):233-40
pubmed: 23364305
J Phys Act Health. 2014 Jul;11(5):873-83
pubmed: 23676857
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Aug;51(2):253-263
pubmed: 27017420
J Phys Act Health. 2017 Sep;14(9):701-709
pubmed: 28513338
Health Promot Int. 2016 Jun;31(2):430-9
pubmed: 25669200
Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1311-24
pubmed: 27475266
Implement Sci. 2011 Dec 15;6:128
pubmed: 22172049
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Nov;33(11):1322-8
pubmed: 23510701
J Phys Act Health. 2006 Feb;3(s1):S20-S29
pubmed: 28834511
World Hosp Health Serv. 2009;45(1):4-8
pubmed: 19670517
Public Health Rep. 2004 May-Jun;119(3):352-5
pubmed: 15158114
J Phys Act Health. 2014 May;11 Suppl 1:S113-25
pubmed: 25426906
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Nov 13;17(1):86
pubmed: 31722717
Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):294-305
pubmed: 22818941
Bull World Health Organ. 2008 May;86(5):322-2A
pubmed: 18545727
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Sep;39(3):273-9
pubmed: 20709260
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2008 Jul 31;5:18
pubmed: 18667088
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Nov 28;15(1):123
pubmed: 30486826
Health Policy Plan. 1994 Dec;9(4):353-70
pubmed: 10139469
Int J Public Health. 2016 Jun;61(5):553-63
pubmed: 27113707
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 21;9(8):e105620
pubmed: 25144686
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Jun;49(11):749-56
pubmed: 24682248
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Sep;50(18):1107-8
pubmed: 27587835
Health Promot Int. 2011 Sep;26(3):322-9
pubmed: 21177769
Public Health Rep. 2004 May-Jun;119(3):346-51
pubmed: 15158113