Systematic prostate biopsy still matters: A comprehensive analysis of MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies across different indications.
Biopsy
Cancer
Localization
Magnetic resonance imaging
Prostatic neoplasms
Ultrasound
Journal
Urologic oncology
ISSN: 1873-2496
Titre abrégé: Urol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9805460
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2019
10 2019
Historique:
received:
10
03
2019
revised:
09
06
2019
accepted:
08
07
2019
pubmed:
4
8
2019
medline:
17
9
2020
entrez:
4
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess if a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-targeted biopsy (TB) strategy is precise enough to replace systematic biopsies (SB) among men with different biopsy indications since an imaging-based pathway to guide indication and targeted prostate biopsy is currently under debate. Retrospective analysis was performed of 594 patients with one or more lesions according to Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System (PI-RADS) receiving a consecutive TB and SB for one of the 3 indications: primary cancer suspicion (51.7%), persistent cancer suspicion after prior negative biopsy (35.4%), or control of a confirmed cancer (12.9%). Detection rates for overall cancer (CaP) and clinically significant cancer (csCaP, Gleason Score ≥3+4) were compared between TB and SB and to a combined approach for all patients and within the subgroups. Characteristics of cancers missed by one biopsy strategy were analyzed. TB detected less CaP (302 vs. 366, P < 0.001) and csCaP (204 vs. 210 patients, P = 0.409) compared to SB except for men with prior negative biopsies (65 vs. 64 csCaP, P = 0.363). Cancer detection by TB or SB was independent of cancer localization and imaging characteristics. Combined TB and SB outperformed the single approaches for CaP and csCaP detection in each subgroup. A single mpMRI and TB approach leads to a substantial number of missed CaP and csCaP across biopsies with different indications. Ongoing improvements of imaging, reading standardization, and biopsy techniques are required before replacing SB.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31375340
pii: S1078-1439(19)30260-1
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.07.004
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
678-687Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.