Color Doppler ultrasound and computed tomographic angiography for perforator mapping in DIEP flap breast reconstruction revisited: A cohort study.
Abdominal Muscles
/ blood supply
Adult
Autografts
Breast Neoplasms
/ pathology
Cohort Studies
Computed Tomography Angiography
/ methods
Epigastric Arteries
/ diagnostic imaging
Female
Graft Survival
Humans
Intraoperative Care
/ methods
Mammaplasty
/ methods
Mastectomy
/ methods
Microsurgery
/ methods
Middle Aged
Perforator Flap
/ blood supply
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Switzerland
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color
/ methods
Ultrasonography, Interventional
/ methods
Autologous
Breast reconstruction
DIEP
Preoperative imaging
Journal
Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS
ISSN: 1878-0539
Titre abrégé: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101264239
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
25
12
2018
revised:
02
05
2019
accepted:
09
06
2019
pubmed:
4
8
2019
medline:
23
4
2020
entrez:
4
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Preoperative imaging by Computed Tomographic Angiography (CTA) has been promoted a gold standard tool for perforator mapping in abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction, while Color Doppler Ultrasound (CDU) has lost its popularity. As the CTA X-ray exposure might have long-term consequences for patients, CDU has regained importance for preoperative workup in our center. Our aim was to revisit the role of CDU by comparing the reliability of CDU and CTA in predicting intraoperative perforator selection. We performed a retrospective chart review study of patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstructions with DIEP flaps at our institution. Both CTA and CDU were performed prior to the surgery, and both imaging entities were thoroughly examined by the surgical team. Perforator identification, number, size, and location were assessed and correlated with CTA and CDU data and with intraoperative findings. We identified 98 patients who received 125 DIEP flap surgeries. A significantly stronger correlation was found between CDU and intraoperative findings of perforator detection and size (p<0.0001) and selection (r = 0.9987, CI 0.9981-0.9991, p < 0.0001 and r = 0.01, CI -0.18-0.2, p = 0.91, respectively), when compared with CTA data. If none of the preoperative imaging studies matched intraoperative perforator selection, an association with a higher incidence of flap loss (Odds ratio 4.483, CI 0.5068-39.65, p = 0.2171) was found. Our data suggests that CDU might regain relevance as a safe and reliable preoperative imaging study, without the risk and potential consequences of X-ray exposure. Preoperative imaging tools like CDU and CTA should be considered part of the gold standard in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31375431
pii: S1748-6815(19)30286-4
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.06.008
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1632-1639Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.