In vitro survival of follicles in prepubertal ewe ovarian cortex cryopreserved by slow freezing or non-equilibrium vitrification.
Cryopreservation
Fertility preservation
In vitro folliculogenesis
Ovarian cortex
Vitrification
Journal
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
ISSN: 1573-7330
Titre abrégé: J Assist Reprod Genet
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9206495
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
18
02
2019
accepted:
09
07
2019
pubmed:
4
8
2019
medline:
6
2
2020
entrez:
4
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Vitrification is a well-accepted fertility preservation procedure for cryopreservation of oocytes and embryos but little is known regarding ovarian tissue, for which slow freezing is the current convention. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficiency of non-equilibrium vitrification compared to conventional slow freezing for ovarian cortex cryopreservation. Using prepubertal sheep ovaries, the capacity of the tissue to sustain folliculogenesis following cryopreservation and in vitro culture was evaluated. Ovarian cortex fragments were cultured in wells for 9 days, immediately or after cryopreservation by conventional slow freezing or non-equilibrium vitrification in straws. During culture, follicular populations within cortex were evaluated by histology and immunohistochemistry for PCNA and TUNEL. Steroidogenic activity of the tissue was monitored by assay for progesterone and estradiol in spent media. No significant differences in follicle morphology, PCNA, or TUNEL labeling were observed between cryopreservation methods at the initiation of culture. Similar decreases in the proportion of primordial follicle population, and increases in the proportion of growing follicles, were observed following culture of fresh or cryopreserved ovarian tissue regardless of cryopreservation method. At the end of culture, PCNA and TUNEL-positive follicles were not statistically altered by slow freezing or vitrification in comparison to fresh cultured fragments. Overall, for both cryopreservation methods, the cryopreserved tissue showed equal capacity to fresh tissue for supporting basal folliculogenesis in vitro. Taken together, these data confirm that both non-equilibrium vitrification and slow-freezing methods are both efficient for the cryopreservation of sheep ovarian cortex fragments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31376104
doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01532-8
pii: 10.1007/s10815-019-01532-8
pmc: PMC6731053
doi:
Substances chimiques
Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen
0
Progesterone
4G7DS2Q64Y
Estradiol
4TI98Z838E
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1823-1835Subventions
Organisme : Conseil Régional du Centre-Val de Loire
ID : 320000268
Organisme : Conseil Régional du Centre-Val de Loire
ID : 320000268
Références
Biol Reprod. 1993 Apr;48(4):798-806
pubmed: 8485244
Cryobiology. 2017 Dec;79:29-36
pubmed: 28987775
Hum Reprod. 2016 Aug;31(8):1838-49
pubmed: 27282911
Hum Reprod. 2009 Oct;24(10):2531-40
pubmed: 19597190
Cryobiology. 2018 Apr;81:178-184
pubmed: 29352979
PLoS One. 2010 Jan 27;5(1):e8772
pubmed: 20111701
Reproduction. 2009 Aug;138(2):319-27
pubmed: 19439559
Theriogenology. 2004 Jun;61(9):1691-704
pubmed: 15019464
Theriogenology. 2011 Sep 15;76(5):933-41
pubmed: 21719087
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 17;7(1):8538
pubmed: 28819292
Anim Reprod Sci. 2014 Oct;149(3-4):124-34
pubmed: 25085606
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011 Jun 08;9:78
pubmed: 21651765
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009 Jun 1;103(2):378-86
pubmed: 19191350
Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Apr;18(4):568-77
pubmed: 19401001
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2018 Jul;30(8):1055-1065
pubmed: 29332622
Lancet. 2014 Oct 4;384(9950):1302-10
pubmed: 25283571
J Ovarian Res. 2018 Aug 7;11(1):65
pubmed: 30086787
Lancet. 2004 Oct 16-22;364(9443):1405-10
pubmed: 15488215
Fertil Steril. 2012 Nov;98(5):1291-8.e1-2
pubmed: 22883570
Cryobiology. 2010 Apr;60(2):101-5
pubmed: 19800618
Reprod Domest Anim. 2019 Feb;54(2):216-224
pubmed: 30203872
Fertil Steril. 2013 Aug;100(2):483-91.e5
pubmed: 23628106
Hum Reprod. 2009 Jul;24(7):1670-83
pubmed: 19359339
Cryo Letters. 2018 Sep/Oct;39(5):313-321
pubmed: 30963163
Biol Reprod. 2009 Jul;81(1):16-25
pubmed: 19264701
Cryobiology. 2007 Dec;55(3):261-8
pubmed: 17931616
Hum Reprod. 2005 Oct;20(10):2745-8
pubmed: 15980012
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015 Aug;32(8):1167-70
pubmed: 26210678
Mol Hum Reprod. 2016 May;22(5):338-49
pubmed: 26908644
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Aug;23(2):160-86
pubmed: 21676653
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 Mar;34(3):325-336
pubmed: 28028773
Hum Reprod. 2015 Mar;30(3):608-15
pubmed: 25567618
Hum Reprod. 1997 Sep;12(9):1993-2001
pubmed: 9363719
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013 Dec;9(12):735-49
pubmed: 24166000
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011 Aug;37(8):1092-101
pubmed: 21501331
J Endocrinol. 2017 Feb;232(2):205-219
pubmed: 27852727
Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 May;36(5):491-499
pubmed: 29503209
Hum Reprod. 1994 Apr;9(4):597-603
pubmed: 8046009
Hum Reprod. 2014 May;29(5):989-96
pubmed: 24522758
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2011 Oct;75(4):409-19
pubmed: 21575025
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Jun 10;108(2):186-93
pubmed: 12781409
N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 26;360(9):902-11
pubmed: 19246362
Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2012 Mar;39(1):10-4
pubmed: 22563545
Fertil Steril. 2006 Oct;86(4 Suppl):1080-7
pubmed: 16978625
Fertil Steril. 2011 Feb;95(2):695-701
pubmed: 20828687
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Jan;35(1):61-69
pubmed: 29098533
Reprod Domest Anim. 2015 Apr;50(2):177-185
pubmed: 25545956
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2015 Mar;27(3):440-8
pubmed: 25481978