Comparison of Outcomes and Toxicity Between Extreme and Moderate Radiation Therapy Hypofractionation in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Propensity Score Analysis.


Journal

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 11 2019
Historique:
received: 15 03 2019
revised: 12 07 2019
accepted: 21 07 2019
pubmed: 5 8 2019
medline: 1 2 2020
entrez: 5 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To compare clinical outcomes and toxicities of 2 radiation therapy (RT) schemes for localized prostate cancer (PCa): extreme hypofractionation (EH; fractions of 6.5-7 Gy to a total dose of 32.5-35 Gy) and the moderate hypofractionation (MH; 26 fractions of 2.7 Gy to a total dose of 70.2 Gy). A propensity score method was used to compare the EH-RT and MH-RT groups. Our analysis included a total of 421 patients divided in 2 groups: 227 treated with MH-RT and 194 treated with EH-RT (43 and 30 months median follow-up, respectively). Propensity matching created comparable cohorts. Statistical evaluations were performed on the whole cohort, stratifying the analyses by risk strata factors identified with the propensity scores, and on a subgroup of patients matched by propensity score. Multivariate proportional hazard Cox models were used to compare the 2 groups, mainly for gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity and secondarily for clinical progression-free survival, biochemical progression-free survival, and overall survival. Considering the whole population, acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal greater than grade 1 was significantly more frequent in the whole MH-RT group (P < .001 and P < .002, respectively). A borderline significantly greater late genitourinary was confirmed with the multivariate analysis (P = .07). Concerning tumor outcome, no statistically significant differences were observed. After propensity score matching, 226 patients were included in the analysis. The 2 obtained propensity score matched groups did not differ for any of the clinical and pathologic variables considered for the analysis, resulting in well-balanced cohorts. The results obtained on the whole population were confirmed in the matched groups. EH-RT yields a decreased risk of acute or late toxicities compared with MH-RT, and oncologic outcomes were comparable. Our data indicate that EH-RT might be considered as a treatment modality of choice for select patients with PCa.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31377161
pii: S0360-3016(19)33531-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.027
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01913717']

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

735-744

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Giulia Marvaso (G)

Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: giulia.marvaso@ieo.it.

Delia Ciardo (D)

Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Sara Gandini (S)

Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Giulia Riva (G)

Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematoncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Emanuele Frigo (E)

Department of Oncology and Hematoncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Stefania Volpe (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematoncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Cristiana Fodor (C)

Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Dario Zerini (D)

Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Damaris Patricia Rojas (DP)

Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Stefania Comi (S)

Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Raffaella Cambria (R)

Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Federica Cattani (F)

Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Gennaro Musi (G)

Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Ottavio De Cobelli (O)

Department of Oncology and Hematoncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Roberto Orecchia (R)

Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa (BA)

Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematoncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH