Comparison of Outcomes and Toxicity Between Extreme and Moderate Radiation Therapy Hypofractionation in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Propensity Score Analysis.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cohort Studies
Gastrointestinal Tract
/ radiation effects
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Propensity Score
Proportional Hazards Models
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ pathology
Radiation Dose Hypofractionation
Radiation Injuries
/ complications
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Urogenital System
/ radiation effects
Journal
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 11 2019
15 11 2019
Historique:
received:
15
03
2019
revised:
12
07
2019
accepted:
21
07
2019
pubmed:
5
8
2019
medline:
1
2
2020
entrez:
5
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare clinical outcomes and toxicities of 2 radiation therapy (RT) schemes for localized prostate cancer (PCa): extreme hypofractionation (EH; fractions of 6.5-7 Gy to a total dose of 32.5-35 Gy) and the moderate hypofractionation (MH; 26 fractions of 2.7 Gy to a total dose of 70.2 Gy). A propensity score method was used to compare the EH-RT and MH-RT groups. Our analysis included a total of 421 patients divided in 2 groups: 227 treated with MH-RT and 194 treated with EH-RT (43 and 30 months median follow-up, respectively). Propensity matching created comparable cohorts. Statistical evaluations were performed on the whole cohort, stratifying the analyses by risk strata factors identified with the propensity scores, and on a subgroup of patients matched by propensity score. Multivariate proportional hazard Cox models were used to compare the 2 groups, mainly for gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity and secondarily for clinical progression-free survival, biochemical progression-free survival, and overall survival. Considering the whole population, acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal greater than grade 1 was significantly more frequent in the whole MH-RT group (P < .001 and P < .002, respectively). A borderline significantly greater late genitourinary was confirmed with the multivariate analysis (P = .07). Concerning tumor outcome, no statistically significant differences were observed. After propensity score matching, 226 patients were included in the analysis. The 2 obtained propensity score matched groups did not differ for any of the clinical and pathologic variables considered for the analysis, resulting in well-balanced cohorts. The results obtained on the whole population were confirmed in the matched groups. EH-RT yields a decreased risk of acute or late toxicities compared with MH-RT, and oncologic outcomes were comparable. Our data indicate that EH-RT might be considered as a treatment modality of choice for select patients with PCa.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31377161
pii: S0360-3016(19)33531-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.027
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01913717']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
735-744Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.