"Doubled-haploid" allohexaploid Brassica lines lose fertility and viability and accumulate genetic variation due to genomic instability.
Allopolyploidy
Brassica
Copy number variation
Interspecific hybrids
Meiosis
Microspore culture
Journal
Chromosoma
ISSN: 1432-0886
Titre abrégé: Chromosoma
Pays: Austria
ID NLM: 2985138R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
received:
17
10
2018
accepted:
24
07
2019
revised:
17
07
2019
pubmed:
5
8
2019
medline:
14
4
2020
entrez:
5
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Microspore culture stimulates immature pollen grains to develop into plants via tissue culture and is used routinely in many crop species to produce "doubled haploids": homozygous, true-breeding lines. However, microspore culture is also often used on material that does not have stable meiosis, such as interspecific hybrids. In this case, the resulting progeny may lose their "doubled haploid" homozygous status as a result of chromosome missegregation and homoeologous exchanges. However, little is known about the frequency of these effects. We assessed fertility, meiosis and genetic variability in self-pollinated progeny sets (the MDL2 population) resulting from first-generation plants (the MDL1 population) derived from microspores of a near-allohexaploid interspecific hybrid from the cross (Brassica napus × B. carinata) × B. juncea. Allelic inheritance and copy number variation were predicted using single nucleotide polymorphism marker data from the Illumina Infinium 60K Brassica array. Seed fertility and viability decreased substantially from the MDL1 to the MDL2 generation. In the MDL2 population, 87% of individuals differed genetically from their MDL1 parent. These genetic differences resulted from novel homoeologous exchanges between chromosomes, chromosome loss and gain, and segregation and instability of pre-existing karyotype abnormalities. Novel karyotype change was extremely common, with 2.2 new variants observed per MDL2 individual. Significant differences between progeny sets in the number of novel genetic variants were also observed. Meiotic instability clearly has the potential to dramatically change karyotypes (often without detectable effects on the presence or absence of alleles) in putatively homozygous, microspore-derived lines, resulting in loss of fertility and viability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31377850
doi: 10.1007/s00412-019-00720-w
pii: 10.1007/s00412-019-00720-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
521-532Références
Genetics. 2007 Feb;175(2):487-503
pubmed: 17151256
Science. 2008 Apr 25;320(5875):481-3
pubmed: 18436776
Theor Appl Genet. 2017 Dec;130(12):2479-2490
pubmed: 29043379
Theor Appl Genet. 2011 Feb;122(3):543-53
pubmed: 21046065
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jun 28;9:907
pubmed: 30002669
Plant J. 2012 May;70(4):691-703
pubmed: 22268419
Trends Biotechnol. 2015 Aug;33(8):436-41
pubmed: 26164645
Plant Biotechnol J. 2017 Dec;15(12):1602-1610
pubmed: 28403535
Plant Genome. 2017 Nov;10(3):
pubmed: 29293818
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Mar 13;109(11):4227-32
pubmed: 22371599
New Phytol. 2010 Apr;186(1):18-28
pubmed: 20002315
New Phytol. 2010 Apr;186(1):102-12
pubmed: 20149113
Theor Appl Genet. 2016 Nov;129(11):2085-2100
pubmed: 27480156
Nat Rev Genet. 2005 Nov;6(11):836-46
pubmed: 16304599
Genetics. 2014 May;197(1):273-83
pubmed: 24558262
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 15;92(17):7719-23
pubmed: 7644483
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Aug 28;9:1161
pubmed: 30210508
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 10;108(19):7908-13
pubmed: 21512129
Plant Biotechnol J. 2017 Nov;15(11):1478-1489
pubmed: 28370938
Theor Appl Genet. 2016 Jul;129(7):1257-1271
pubmed: 26971112
Elife. 2015 Mar 27;4:null
pubmed: 25815584
Chromosome Res. 2010 Sep;18(6):655-66
pubmed: 20571876
Theor Appl Genet. 2009 Aug;119(3):497-505
pubmed: 19436985
Theor Appl Genet. 2017 Apr;130(4):621-633
pubmed: 28220206
Genetics. 1996 Dec;144(4):1903-10
pubmed: 8978073
Theor Appl Genet. 2010 Nov;121(8):1431-40
pubmed: 20607208
Nature. 2007 Mar 15;446(7133):279-83
pubmed: 17361174
BMC Plant Biol. 2015 Jul 08;15:173
pubmed: 26152188
New Phytol. 2013 May;198(3):670-84
pubmed: 23421646
Trends Genet. 2011 Jun;27(6):207-16
pubmed: 21592609
Genetics. 2011 Mar;187(3):659-73
pubmed: 21196520
Theor Appl Genet. 2017 Apr;130(4):767-776
pubmed: 28097399
Theor Appl Genet. 2016 Oct;129(10):1887-99
pubmed: 27364915
Chromosome Res. 2013 Mar;21(1):75-85
pubmed: 23430325
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 1;13(3):e0193548
pubmed: 29494698
J Evol Biol. 2013 Feb;26(2):229-46
pubmed: 23323997
New Phytol. 2014 May;202(3):964-74
pubmed: 24471809