Post-Myocardial Infarction Scar With Fat Deposition Shows Specific Electrophysiological Properties and Worse Outcome After Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation.
catheter ablation
computed tomography
fat deposition
myocardial infarction
ventricular tachycardia
Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
ISSN: 2047-9980
Titre abrégé: J Am Heart Assoc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580524
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 08 2019
06 08 2019
Historique:
entrez:
6
8
2019
pubmed:
6
8
2019
medline:
5
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background Fat deposition (FD) is part of the healing process after myocardial infarction. The characteristics of FD and its impact on the outcome in patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation have not been thoroughly studied. Methods and Results We studied consecutive patients undergoing post-myocardial infarction VT ablation with pre-procedural cardiac computed tomography. FD was defined as intra-myocardial attenuation ≤ -30 HU on computed tomography. Clinical, anatomical, and post-procedural outcome was assessed in the overall population. Electrophysiological characteristics were assessed is a subgroup of patients with high-density electro-anatomical maps. Sixty-nine patients were included (66±12 years). FD was detected in 44 (64%) patients. The presence of FD related to scar age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.14 per year; P=0.001) and scar extent (OR: 1.27 per segment; P=0.02). On electro-anatomical maps, FD was characterized by lower bipolar amplitude (P<0.001) and prolonged electrogram duration (P<0.001). Although the proportion of local abnormal ventricular activation was similar (P=0.22), local abnormal ventricular activation showed lower amplitude (P<0.001) and were more delayed (P<0.001) in scars with FD. After a mean follow-up of 26 months, patients with FD experienced a worse outcome including all-cause mortality and VT recurrence (70% versus 28%, P log rank=0.009). On multivariate analysis, FD (hazard ratio=2.69; 95% CI, 1.12-6.46; P=0.027) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (hazard ratio=2.57; 95% CI, 1.13-5.85; P=0.024) were independent predictors of adverse outcomes. Conclusions FD in patients with post-myocardial infarction VT undergoing catheter ablation relates to scar age and size and may be a marker of adverse outcomes including all-cause mortality and VT recurrence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31378121
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012482
pmc: PMC6761638
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e012482Subventions
Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 715093
Pays : International
Références
Trends Mol Med. 2016 Feb;22(2):99-114
pubmed: 26776094
Eur Heart J. 2012 Jun;33(12):1440-50
pubmed: 22411192
Radiology. 1999 Apr;211(1):283-6
pubmed: 10189485
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Aug 6;8(15):e012482
pubmed: 31378121
Circulation. 2012 May 8;125(18):2184-96
pubmed: 22492578
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jul;12(7):1508-18
pubmed: 25814415
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 14;375(2):111-21
pubmed: 27149033
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Aug 1;98(3):303-8
pubmed: 16860013
Cardiovasc Res. 2000 May;46(2):250-6
pubmed: 10773228
Circulation. 2002 Jan 29;105(4):539-42
pubmed: 11815441
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Feb;192(2):532-7
pubmed: 19155421
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Sep;8(9):1111-1112
pubmed: 25457764
Circulation. 1993 Oct;88(4 Pt 1):1647-70
pubmed: 8403311
Can J Cardiol. 1997 Jan;13(1):65-71
pubmed: 9039067
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 May;2(5):548-55
pubmed: 19442939
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Sep 15;267:107-113
pubmed: 29655948
Radiology. 2009 Oct;253(1):65-73
pubmed: 19703860
Circulation. 2013 Nov 19;128(21):2296-308
pubmed: 24036606
Cardiovasc Pathol. 2004 Mar-Apr;13(2):98-102
pubmed: 15033159
Basic Res Cardiol. 2002 Sep;97(5):343-7
pubmed: 12200633
Radiographics. 2010 Oct;30(6):1587-602
pubmed: 21071377
Int J Obes. 1990 Oct;14(10):893-902
pubmed: 2269582
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Oct;10(10):
pubmed: 29038101
Clin Radiol. 2008 Mar;63(3):256-62
pubmed: 18275865