Acquisition of Subcortical Auditory Potentials With Around-the-Ear cEEGrid Technology in Normal and Hearing Impaired Listeners.
EEG
around-the-ear EEG
auditory brainstem response
auditory evoked potentials
cEEGrid
diagnostics
envelope following response
sensorineural hearing loss
Journal
Frontiers in neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-4548
Titre abrégé: Front Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101478481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
14
02
2019
accepted:
01
07
2019
entrez:
6
8
2019
pubmed:
6
8
2019
medline:
6
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Even though the principles of recording brain electrical activity remain unchanged since their discovery, their acquisition has seen major improvements. The cEEGrid, a recently developed flex-printed multi-channel sensory array, can be placed around the ear and successfully record well-known cortical electrophysiological potentials such as late auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) or the P300. Due to its fast and easy application as well as its long-lasting signal recording window, the cEEGrid technology offers great potential as a flexible and 'wearable' solution for the acquisition of neural correlates of hearing. Early potentials of auditory processing such as the auditory brainstem response (ABR) are already used in clinical assessment of sensorineural hearing disorders and envelope following responses (EFR) have shown promising results in the diagnosis of suprathreshold hearing deficits. This study evaluates the suitability of the cEEGrid electrode configuration to capture these AEPs. cEEGrid potentials were recorded and compared to cap-EEG potentials for young normal-hearing listeners and older listeners with high-frequency sloping audiograms to assess whether the recordings are adequately sensitive for hearing diagnostics. ABRs were elicited by presenting clicks (70 and 100-dB peSPL) and stimulation for the EFRs consisted of 120 Hz amplitude-modulated white noise carriers presented at 70-dB SPL. Data from nine bipolar cEEGrid channels and one classical cap-EEG montage (earlobes to vertex) were analysed and outcome measures were compared. Results show that the cEEGrid is able to record ABRs and EFRs with comparable shape to those recorded using a conventional cap-EEG recording montage and the same amplifier. Signal strength is lower but can still produce responses above the individual neural electrophysiological noise floor. This study shows that the application of the cEEGrid can be extended to the acquisition of early auditory evoked potentials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31379484
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00730
pmc: PMC6646709
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
730Références
Hear Res. 1999 Dec;138(1-2):115-32
pubmed: 10575120
Am J Audiol. 2002 Jun;11(1):13-22
pubmed: 12227352
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Sep;114(3):1499-507
pubmed: 14514203
Hear Res. 1992 Feb;58(1):70-8
pubmed: 1559908
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Dec;116(6):3581-93
pubmed: 15658709
J Am Acad Audiol. 2005 Mar;16(3):140-56
pubmed: 15844740
Psychophysiology. 2010 Mar 1;47(2):236-46
pubmed: 19824950
J Neurosci. 2009 Nov 11;29(45):14077-85
pubmed: 19906956
Ear Hear. 2010 Jun;31(3):302-24
pubmed: 20084007
Int J Audiol. 2011 Oct;50(10):708-16
pubmed: 21714709
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2011 Dec;12(6):711-7
pubmed: 21748533
IEEE Pulse. 2012 Nov-Dec;3(6):32-42
pubmed: 23247157
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:586-9
pubmed: 23365960
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Aug;110(3):577-86
pubmed: 23596328
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013 Oct;60(10):2824-30
pubmed: 23722447
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jul;134(1):384-95
pubmed: 23862815
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2013 Sep 7;58 Suppl 1:
pubmed: 24042816
Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 1;86:446-60
pubmed: 24161808
Front Neurosci. 2013 Dec 26;7:267
pubmed: 24431986
Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Feb 21;8:26
pubmed: 24600357
J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 4;35(5):2161-72
pubmed: 25653371
Hear Res. 2015 May;323:68-80
pubmed: 25660195
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 31;112(13):3920-5
pubmed: 25775550
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015 Dec;16(6):727-45
pubmed: 26323349
J Neurosci. 2015 Sep 23;35(38):13257-65
pubmed: 26400953
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 17;5:16743
pubmed: 26572314
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Nov;138(5):3210-9
pubmed: 26627795
Front Neurosci. 2015 Nov 18;9:438
pubmed: 26635514
Nat Commun. 2016 Mar 24;7:11070
pubmed: 27009409
J Neurosci. 2016 Mar 30;36(13):3755-64
pubmed: 27030760
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;894:467-475
pubmed: 27080688
Front Neurosci. 2016 Jul 27;10:349
pubmed: 27512364
Ear Hear. 2016 Sep-Oct;37(5):e322-35
pubmed: 27556365
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 12;11(9):e0162726
pubmed: 27618300
J Neural Eng. 2016 Dec;13(6):066004
pubmed: 27705963
Ear Hear. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):e1-e12
pubmed: 27992391
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Apr 07;11:163
pubmed: 28439233
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jun 08;11:290
pubmed: 28642695
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018 May;65(5):1026-1034
pubmed: 28796603
Hear Res. 2018 Aug;365:36-48
pubmed: 29913342
J Neurosci. 2018 Aug 8;38(32):7108-7119
pubmed: 29976623
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019 Jan;66(1):150-158
pubmed: 29993415
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518788219
pubmed: 30022733
Neuroscience. 2019 May 21;407:8-20
pubmed: 30099118
Hear Res. 2019 Sep 1;380:150-165
pubmed: 31306930
Ear Hear. 1985 Mar-Apr;6(2):105-12
pubmed: 3996784
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1968 Jul;25(1):42-52
pubmed: 4174782
Brain. 1971;94(4):681-96
pubmed: 5132966
Audiology. 1971 May-Jun;10(3):172-6
pubmed: 5163659
Science. 1967 Jul 7;157(3784):92-4
pubmed: 6026675
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1967 Jun;76(2):427-35
pubmed: 6028666
Hear Res. 1996 Apr;93(1-2):52-71
pubmed: 8735068
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Oct;76(4):2799-803
pubmed: 8899648