The German Ethical Culture Scale (GECS): Development and First Construct Testing.
compliance-based culture
ethical culture measure
ethics management
integrity-based culture
organizational culture
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
21
03
2019
accepted:
02
07
2019
entrez:
6
8
2019
pubmed:
6
8
2019
medline:
6
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Misconduct in organizations (such as fraud, stealing, deception, and harming others) is not only a matter of some "bad apples" but also related to the organizational context ("bad barrels"), which can facilitate either ethical or unethical behaviors. Given the financial crisis and recurring corporate ethics scandals, policymakers, regulators and organizations are interested in how to change their organizational cultures to enhance ethical behavior and to prevent further disasters. For this purpose, organizations need to better understand what strategies and factors of the organizational environment can affect (un)ethical behavior. However, to assess the corporate ethical culture, solid measures are required. Since there is an urgent need to have a German measure to promote research in German-speaking countries, this research developed and tested the German Ethical Culture Scale (GECS). Drawing on a prominent approach that has received much attention from scholars and practitioners alike, the GECS attempts to integrate the notion of compliance- and integrity-based ethics programs (with its focus on how to steer organizations) with the notion of ethical culture (with its focus on what factors inhibit or foster ethical behavior). Three studies with heterogeneous samples of German and Swiss employees and managers were conducted to develop, test and validate the multidimensional scale (total
Identifiants
pubmed: 31379685
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01667
pmc: PMC6646868
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1667Références
J R Soc Med. 2019 Apr;112(4):153-159
pubmed: 30507286
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Mar;44(1):144-57
pubmed: 21735344
Psychol Bull. 1999 Mar;125(2):255-75
pubmed: 10087938
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 2;90:37-42
pubmed: 30419321
Am Psychol. 1997 Dec;52(12):1280-300
pubmed: 9414606
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1999;3(3):193-209
pubmed: 15661671
J Health Psychol. 2019 Sep;24(11):1568-1573
pubmed: 28810502
J Appl Psychol. 2013 May;98(3):550-8
pubmed: 23379913
J Appl Psychol. 2011 May;96(3):619-32
pubmed: 21244128
Harv Bus Rev. 2011 Apr;89(4):58-65, 137
pubmed: 21510519
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jan;95(1):1-31
pubmed: 20085404
Harv Bus Rev. 2010 Jun;88(6):26
pubmed: 20535883
Acad Pediatr. 2015 Nov-Dec;15(6):658-65
pubmed: 26547545