Parthenogenetic

Red Queen Structured Resource Theory of Sex Tangled Bank oribatid mites sexual reproduction thelytoky

Journal

Ecology and evolution
ISSN: 2045-7758
Titre abrégé: Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101566408

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Historique:
received: 28 11 2018
revised: 09 05 2019
accepted: 10 05 2019
entrez: 6 8 2019
pubmed: 6 8 2019
medline: 6 8 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The dominance of sex in Metazoa is enigmatic. Sexual species allocate resources to the production of males, while potentially facing negative effects such as the loss of well-adapted genotypes due to recombination, and exposure to diseases and predators during mating. Two major hypotheses have been put forward to explain the advantages of parthenogenetic versus sexual reproduction in animals, that is, the Red Queen hypothesis and the Tangled Bank/Structured Resource Theory of Sex. The Red Queen hypothesis assumes that antagonistic predator-prey/ parasite-host interactions favor sex. The Structured Resource Theory of Sex predicts sexual reproduction to be favored if resources are in short supply and aggregated in space. In soil, a remarkable number of invertebrates reproduce by parthenogenesis, and this pattern is most pronounced in oribatid mites (Oribatida, Acari). Oribatid mites are abundant in virtually any soil across very different habitats, and include many sexual and parthenogenetic (thelytokous) species. Thereby, they represent an ideal model group to investigate the role of sexual versus parthenogenetic reproduction across different ecosystems and habitats. Here, we compiled data on oribatid mite communities from different ecosystems and habitats across biomes, including tropical rainforests, temperate forests, grasslands, arable fields, salt marshes, bogs, caves, and deadwood. Based on the compiled dataset, we analyzed if the percentage of parthenogenetic species and the percentage of individuals of parthenogenetic species are related to total oribatid mite density, species number, and other potential driving factors of the reproductive mode including altitude and latitude. We then interpret the results in support of either the Red Queen hypothesis or the Structured Resource Theory of Sex. Overall, the data showed that low density of oribatid mites due to harsh environmental conditions is associated with high frequency of parthenogenesis supporting predictions of the Structured Resource Theory of Sex rather than the Red Queen hypothesis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31380053
doi: 10.1002/ece3.5303
pii: ECE35303
pmc: PMC6662391
doi:

Banques de données

Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.gr6qb4h']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

7324-7332

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None declared.

Références

J Evol Biol. 2011 Mar;24(3):656-64
pubmed: 21175912
Evolution. 2016 Mar;70(3):641-52
pubmed: 26899793
Exp Appl Acarol. 2014 Aug;63(4):465-79
pubmed: 24687174
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 8;13(11):e0207141
pubmed: 30408121
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 06;9(8):e104243
pubmed: 25099762
Neotrop Entomol. 2009 Jul-Aug;38(4):482-90
pubmed: 19768266
Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 Aug;32(8):589-600
pubmed: 28606425
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 May 7;274(1614):1225-31
pubmed: 17327204
Q Rev Biol. 2012 Mar;87(1):19-40
pubmed: 22518931
Curr Biol. 2009 Sep 15;19(17):1438-41
pubmed: 19631541
Am Nat. 2019 Jun;193(6):755-772
pubmed: 31094602
Am Nat. 2009 Jul;174 Suppl 1:S43-53
pubmed: 19441961
Trends Ecol Evol. 1992 Dec;7(12):405-8
pubmed: 21236081
Ecol Evol. 2019 May 29;9(12):7324-7332
pubmed: 31380053
Exp Appl Acarol. 2006;40(1):1-25
pubmed: 16900312
Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Mar;27(3):172-8
pubmed: 22019414
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010 Oct;57(1):113-21
pubmed: 20420932
Exp Appl Acarol. 2010 Nov;52(3):221-37
pubmed: 20490626
J Hered. 2010 Mar-Apr;101 Suppl 1:S13-20
pubmed: 20421322
Evolution. 2015 Feb;69(2):530-40
pubmed: 25403727
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Sep 14;283(1838):
pubmed: 27605505
Exp Appl Acarol. 2016 Apr;68(4):409-28
pubmed: 26846473

Auteurs

Mark Maraun (M)

JFB Institute of Zoology and Anthropology Georg August University Göttingen Göttingen Germany.

Tancredi Caruso (T)

School of Biological Sciences and Institute for Global Food Security Queen's University of Belfast Belfast Northern Ireland.

Jonathan Hense (J)

Fachdidaktik Biologie, Nees-Institut Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms Universität Bonn Bonn Germany.

Ricarda Lehmitz (R)

Senckenberg Museum of Natural History Görlitz Görlitz Germany.

Levan Mumladze (L)

Institute of Ecology and Institute of Zoology Ilia State University Tbilisi Georgia.

Maka Murvanidze (M)

Institute of Entomology of Agricultural University of Georgia Tbilisi Georgia.

Ioana Nae (I)

Emil Racovita Institute of Speleology of Romanian Academy Bucharest Romania.

Julia Schulz (J)

JFB Institute of Zoology and Anthropology Georg August University Göttingen Göttingen Germany.

Anna Seniczak (A)

Realfagbygget University Museum of Bergen, University of Bergen Bergen Norway.

Stefan Scheu (S)

JFB Institute of Zoology and Anthropology Georg August University Göttingen Göttingen Germany.

Classifications MeSH