Wearing Time of Ankle-Foot Orthoses with Modular Shank Supply in Cerebral Palsy: A Descriptive Analysis in a Clinically Prospective Approach.
Journal
Rehabilitation research and practice
ISSN: 2090-2867
Titre abrégé: Rehabil Res Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101566862
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
05
04
2019
revised:
07
06
2019
accepted:
19
06
2019
entrez:
6
8
2019
pubmed:
6
8
2019
medline:
6
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To date there is only limited knowledge about the wearing time of orthoses. Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) have not been studied with this research question. Additional influences of the orthotic design as well as weekdays and the weekend are also unknown. Monocentric, clinically prospective intervention study. Inclusion of 10 patients with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy. Equipment of all subjects with a dynamic ankle-foot orthosis (DAFO) and modular shank supply (MSS, dynamic elastic shank adaptation or ground reaction AFO). Integration of temperature sensors for recording the wearing time for a period of 3 months. The actual wearing time was below the recommendations on actually worn days as well as the average of the entire study period. In addition, the actual usage in terms of days and hours was well below the recommendations. The wearing time showed differences between weekdays and weekend. Differences between DAFO and MSS were not detectable. The actual usage behavior of ankle-foot orthoses differs from the recommendations of the prescriber. This applies to both DAFOs and modular use with shank supplies. Environmental factors may have a significant impact on wearing times on weekdays and the weekend.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31380119
doi: 10.1155/2019/2978265
pmc: PMC6662432
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2978265Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Références
Gait Posture. 2002 Feb;15(1):18-24
pubmed: 11809577
Eur J Neurol. 2001 Nov;8 Suppl 5:98-108
pubmed: 11851738
Gait Posture. 2005 Nov;22(3):189-97
pubmed: 16214658
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Feb 1;31(3):339-44
pubmed: 16449908
Orthopade. 2007 Aug;36(8):752-6
pubmed: 17639337
Gait Posture. 2008 Jul;28(1):175-7
pubmed: 18255293
J Pediatr Orthop. 2008 Apr-May;28(3):336-41
pubmed: 18362800
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jun 15;33(14):1554-61
pubmed: 18552670
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009 Dec;33(4):401-2
pubmed: 19961299
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Jun;92(6):1343-52
pubmed: 20516309
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2010 Sep;34(3):327-35
pubmed: 20738235
NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;28(1):37-46
pubmed: 21335676
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Feb 15;37(4):309-15
pubmed: 21540779
J Child Orthop. 2010 Aug;4(4):343-7
pubmed: 21804897
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2013 May;56(4):253-67
pubmed: 23312436
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Oct;92(10):905-11
pubmed: 23739274
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 17;369(16):1512-21
pubmed: 24047455
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;67(3):267-77
pubmed: 24275499
Clin Rehabil. 2014 Oct;28(10):1025-38
pubmed: 25082956
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Oct 5;98(19):1598-1605
pubmed: 27707845
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Feb;40(4):398-403
pubmed: 27927029
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Nov;60(6):393-402
pubmed: 28713039
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018 Jan;60(1):88-93
pubmed: 29171016
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 14;13(3):e0192094
pubmed: 29538382
Clin Rehabil. 2018 Sep;32(9):1175-1188
pubmed: 29714066
Gait Posture. 2019 Feb;68:525-530
pubmed: 30623847
Gait Posture. 2019 Mar;69:101-111
pubmed: 30708092
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1988 Feb;30(1):3-10
pubmed: 3371569
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997 Apr;39(4):214-23
pubmed: 9183258
J Pediatr Orthop. 1998 Nov-Dec;18(6):743-7
pubmed: 9821129