Dual System Youth and their Pathways: A Comparison of Incidence, Characteristics and System Experiences using Linked Administrative Data.
Child welfare and juvenile justice involvement
Crossover youth
Dual system youth
Dually-involved youth
Journal
Journal of youth and adolescence
ISSN: 1573-6601
Titre abrégé: J Youth Adolesc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0333507
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
15
04
2019
accepted:
22
07
2019
pubmed:
7
8
2019
medline:
6
2
2020
entrez:
7
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Insight into the characteristics and system experiences for youth who touch both the child welfare and juvenile justice systems has increased over the last decade. These youth are typically studied as one population and referred to as "crossover youth." While this literature contributes valuable insight into who crossover youth are, studies are virtually silent on distinguishing characteristics and experiences across different pathways leading to dual system contact. This study reviews what is currently known about dual system youth generally (i.e., youth who have contact with both the juvenile justice and child welfare systems) and introduces a framework for consistently defining dual system youth and their pathways. The utility of the framework is then explored using linked administrative data for cohorts of youth aged 10 to 18 years old with a first petition to delinquency court in three sites: Cook County, Illinois between 2010 and 2014 (N = 14,170); Cuyahoga County, Ohio between 2010 and 2014 (N = 11,441); and New York City between 2013 and 2014 (N = 1272). The findings show a high prevalence of dual system contact overall, ranging from 44.8 to 70.3%, as well as wide variation in the ways in which youth touched both systems. Specifically, non-concurrent system contact is more prevalent than concurrent system contact in all sites, and individual characteristics and system experiences vary within and across these different pathway groups. Based on study findings, implications for future research on dual system youth and for developing collaborative practices and policies across the systems are discussed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31385232
doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01090-3
pii: 10.1007/s10964-019-01090-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2432-2450Références
J Youth Adolesc. 2013 Mar;42(3):454-65
pubmed: 23334336
Child Abuse Negl. 2019 Jan;87:40-50
pubmed: 30049476
Child Maltreat. 2018 Feb;23(1):34-43
pubmed: 28707475
Child Abuse Negl. 2005 Oct;29(10):1099-119
pubmed: 16233913
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Apr;45(4):625-54
pubmed: 26699636
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2013 Jul 16;4:null
pubmed: 23869252