Contact allergy to hair cosmetic allergens in Thailand.
Adult
Allergens
/ adverse effects
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact
/ epidemiology
Dermatitis, Occupational
/ epidemiology
Facial Dermatoses
/ epidemiology
Female
Hair Bleaching Agents
/ adverse effects
Hair Dyes
/ adverse effects
Hand Dermatoses
/ epidemiology
Humans
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Neck
Patch Tests
Preservatives, Pharmaceutical
/ adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Scalp Dermatoses
/ epidemiology
Surface-Active Agents
/ adverse effects
Thailand
/ epidemiology
allergic contact dermatitis
contact allergy
hair cosmetics
hair dyes
scalp dermatitis
Journal
Contact dermatitis
ISSN: 1600-0536
Titre abrégé: Contact Dermatitis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7604950
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
16
06
2019
revised:
27
07
2019
accepted:
04
08
2019
pubmed:
7
8
2019
medline:
6
5
2020
entrez:
7
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Hair cosmetics such as hair dyes, bleaching, waving, and cleansing products are composed of numerous chemical ingredients. Allergic reactions to these contact allergens, other than p-phenylenediamine, are rarely reported. To study the incidence of patch test reactions to hair cosmetic allergens and identify the factors associated with hair cosmetic allergy in Thailand. We retrospectively reviewed the case records of patients who underwent patch testing from 2009 to 2018. Patients with at least one positive patch test reaction to a potential contact allergen associated with hair cosmetic ingredients were studied. Overall, 2842 patients were patch tested. Of the hair cosmetic allergen categories, preservatives had the highest rate of positive reactions, followed by surfactants and hair dyes. Perming agents were less problematic in comparison. The hands, head, and neck were the predominately affected sites of allergic reactions to hair cosmetic ingredients. Preservatives, surfactants, and hair dyes are important contact allergens, whereas perming agents are less likely to cause allergic reactions. Hair cosmetic ingredients are regulated by national agencies, which influences their extent of exposure and rates of contact allergies. Further continuous observation of hair cosmetic allergy is needed to provide the best patient care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Hair cosmetics such as hair dyes, bleaching, waving, and cleansing products are composed of numerous chemical ingredients. Allergic reactions to these contact allergens, other than p-phenylenediamine, are rarely reported.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To study the incidence of patch test reactions to hair cosmetic allergens and identify the factors associated with hair cosmetic allergy in Thailand.
METHODS
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed the case records of patients who underwent patch testing from 2009 to 2018. Patients with at least one positive patch test reaction to a potential contact allergen associated with hair cosmetic ingredients were studied.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, 2842 patients were patch tested. Of the hair cosmetic allergen categories, preservatives had the highest rate of positive reactions, followed by surfactants and hair dyes. Perming agents were less problematic in comparison. The hands, head, and neck were the predominately affected sites of allergic reactions to hair cosmetic ingredients.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Preservatives, surfactants, and hair dyes are important contact allergens, whereas perming agents are less likely to cause allergic reactions. Hair cosmetic ingredients are regulated by national agencies, which influences their extent of exposure and rates of contact allergies. Further continuous observation of hair cosmetic allergy is needed to provide the best patient care.
Substances chimiques
Allergens
0
Hair Bleaching Agents
0
Hair Dyes
0
Preservatives, Pharmaceutical
0
Surface-Active Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
426-431Informations de copyright
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Kumar S. Exploratory analysis of global cosmetic industry: major players, technology and market trends. Dent Tech. 2005;25:1263-1272.
Gray J. Hair care and hair care products. Clin Dermatol. 2001;19:227-236.
Guerra-Tapia A, Gonzalez-Guerra E. Hair cosmetics: dyes. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014;105:833-839.
Søsted H, Basketter DA, Estrada E, Johansen JD, Patlewicz GY. Ranking of hair dye substances according to predicted sensitization potency: quantitative structure-activity relationships. Contact Dermatitis. 2004;51:241-254.
Cruz MJ, De Vooght V, Munoz X, et al. Assessment of the sensitization potential of persulfate salts used for bleaching hair. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;60:85-90.
Thyssen JP, White JM, European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Epidemiological data on consumer allergy to p-phenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis. 2008;59:327-343.
Sukakul T, Chaweekulrat P, Limphoka P, Boonchai W. Changing trends of contact allergens in Thailand: a 12-year retrospective study. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;81:124-129.
Boonchai W, Bunyavaree M, Winayanuwattikun W, Kasemsarn P. Contact sensitizers in commercial hair dye products sold in Thailand. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;74:222-229.
Yazar K, Boman A, Lidén C. Potent skin sensitizers in oxidative hair dye products on the Swedish market. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;61:269-275.
Hamann D, Yazar K, Hamann CR, Thyssen JP, Lidén C. p-Phenylenediamine and other allergens in hair dye products in the United States: a consumer exposure study. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;70:213-218.
Valks R, Conde-Salazar L, Malfeito J, Ledo S. Contact dermatitis in hairdressers, 10 years later: patch-test results in 300 hairdressers (1994 to 2003) and comparison with previous study. Dermatitis. 2005;16:28-31.
Uter W, Gefeller O, John SM, Schnuch A, Geier J. Contact allergy to ingredients of hair cosmetics - a comparison of female hairdressers and clients based on IVDK 2007-2012 data. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;71:13-20.
Johansen JD, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, et al. European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing - recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;73:195-221.
Boonchai W, Kasemsarn P. Suitability of patch test allergens for standard series in Thai patients: ten-year retrospective review of patch test results. J Dermatol. 2013;40:65-67.
Rietschel RL. Practical aspects of patch testing. In: Rietschel RL, Fowler JFJ, eds. Fischer's Contact Dermatitis. Hamilton, Canada: BC Decker; 2008:11-29.
Sukakul T, Kanchanapenkul D, Bunyavaree M, Limphoka P, Kumpangsin T, Boonchai W. Methylchloroisothiazolinone and/or methylisothiazolinone in cosmetic products-a market survey. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;80:110-113.
Jacob SE, Amini S. Cocamidopropyl betaine. Dermatitis. 2008;19:157-160.
Brey NL, Fowler JF Jr. Relevance of positive patch-test reactions to cocamidopropyl betaine and amidoamine. Dermatitis. 2004;15:7-9.
Academic Resource Center, Thailand FDA. Declaration of Thai Ministry of Public Health. Bangkok, Thailand: Food and Drug Administration Thailand; 2008. http://elib.fda.moph.go.th/elib/cgi-bin/opacexe. Accessed November 1, 2015.
Gijbels D, Timmermans A, Serrano P, Verreycken E, Goossens A. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by alkyl glucosides. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;70:175-182.
Fowler JF Jr. Cocamidopropyl betaine. Dermatitis. 2004;15:3-4.
Patel S, Basketter DA, Jefferies D, et al. Patch test frequency to p-phenylenediamine: follow up over the last 6 years. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;56:35-37.
Schnuch A, Lessmann H, Frosch PJ, Uter W. para-Phenylenediamine: the profile of an important allergen. Results of the IVDK. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159:379-386.
Thyssen JP, Andersen KE, Bruze M, et al. p-Phenylenediamine sensitization is more prevalent in central and southern European patch test centres than in Scandinavian: results from a multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;60:314-319.
Boonchai W, Desomchoke R, Iamtharachai P. Trend of contact allergy to cosmetic ingredients in Thais over a period of 10 years. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;65:311-316.
Xie Z, Hayakawa R, Sugiura M, et al. Experimental study on skin sensitization potencies and cross-reactivities of hair-dye-related chemicals in guinea pigs. Contact Dermatitis. 2000;42:270-275.
Basketter DA, Goodwin BF. Investigation of the prohapten concept. Cross reactions between 1,4-substituted benzene derivatives in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis. 1988;19:248-253.
Bonefeld CM, Geisler C, Giménez-Arnau E, Lepoittevin JP, Uter W, Johansen JD. Immunological, chemical and clinical aspects of exposure to mixtures of contact allergens. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;77:133-142.
Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Riihimaki V, Kalimo K. Patch test reactions and occupational dermatoses caused by hydrogen peroxide. Contact Dermatitis. 1998;39:146.