Six-year retrospective analysis of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided pancreatic ductal interventions at a tertiary referral center.
endoscopic retrograde pancreatography
endoscopic ultrasonography
outcomes
pancreas
pancreatic ductal intervention
Journal
Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society
ISSN: 1443-1661
Titre abrégé: Dig Endosc
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9101419
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
05
06
2019
accepted:
31
07
2019
pubmed:
7
8
2019
medline:
29
1
2021
entrez:
7
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided pancreatic ductal intervention (EUS-PDI) serves as a rescue therapy in patients with failure of retrograde access to the pancreatic duct (PD) at the time of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). We review our experience of this procedure. This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent EUS-PDI for an unsuccessful ERP and altered anatomy. A total of 44 (65.9% male) patients underwent EUS-PDI with a mean age of 43.5 years, (range: 23-67). Transgastric rendezvous technique was carried out in 23/44 (52.3%), transgastric pancreaticogastrostomy in 18/44 (40.9%) and transduodenal pancreaticobulbostomy in 3/44 (6.8%). Overall technical and clinical success was seen in 88.6% (39/44) and 81.8% (36/44), respectively. Technical success of transgastric rendezvous was 95.6% and that of transgastric pancreaticogastrostomy was 77.8%. Two of seven patients with failure to access the PD had successfully undergone EUS-PD stenting at subsequent attempt. Ten immediate adverse events (AE) were noted which included abdominal pain (n = 4), pancreatitis (n = 2), fever (n = 2), minor bleeding (n = 1), and stripping of wire (n = 1). Delayed AE included stent blockage in 12/39 (30.8%) and spontaneous stent migration in 5/39 (12.8%) which were managed with stent exchange at follow up. The rendezvous technique was associated with fewer AE than transgastric pancreaticogastrostomy. Endoscopic ultrasonography-PDI is an effective treatment modality and salvage therapy in patients with unsuccessful ERP. Technical and clinical success seen with this study is comparable to studies conducted across the world. EUS-PDI needs to show cost-effectiveness in future studies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
OBJECTIVE
Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided pancreatic ductal intervention (EUS-PDI) serves as a rescue therapy in patients with failure of retrograde access to the pancreatic duct (PD) at the time of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). We review our experience of this procedure.
METHODS
METHODS
This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent EUS-PDI for an unsuccessful ERP and altered anatomy.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 44 (65.9% male) patients underwent EUS-PDI with a mean age of 43.5 years, (range: 23-67). Transgastric rendezvous technique was carried out in 23/44 (52.3%), transgastric pancreaticogastrostomy in 18/44 (40.9%) and transduodenal pancreaticobulbostomy in 3/44 (6.8%). Overall technical and clinical success was seen in 88.6% (39/44) and 81.8% (36/44), respectively. Technical success of transgastric rendezvous was 95.6% and that of transgastric pancreaticogastrostomy was 77.8%. Two of seven patients with failure to access the PD had successfully undergone EUS-PD stenting at subsequent attempt. Ten immediate adverse events (AE) were noted which included abdominal pain (n = 4), pancreatitis (n = 2), fever (n = 2), minor bleeding (n = 1), and stripping of wire (n = 1). Delayed AE included stent blockage in 12/39 (30.8%) and spontaneous stent migration in 5/39 (12.8%) which were managed with stent exchange at follow up. The rendezvous technique was associated with fewer AE than transgastric pancreaticogastrostomy.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Endoscopic ultrasonography-PDI is an effective treatment modality and salvage therapy in patients with unsuccessful ERP. Technical and clinical success seen with this study is comparable to studies conducted across the world. EUS-PDI needs to show cost-effectiveness in future studies.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
409-416Informations de copyright
© 2019 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.
Références
Christodoulou DK, Tsianos EV. Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in pancreatic diseases. World J. Gastroenterol. 2010; 16: 4755-61.
Gleeson FC, Topazian M. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2007; 9: 123-9.
Balik E, Eren T, Keskin M et al. Parameters that may be used for predicting failure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J. Oncol. 2013; 2013: 201681.
Baillie J. Difficult endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. (N Y) 2014; 10: 49-51.
Tessier G, Bories E, Arvanitakis M et al. EUS-guided pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatobulbostomy for the treatment of pain in patients with pancreatic ductal dilatation inaccessible for transpapillary endoscopic therapy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2007; 65: 233-41.
François E, Kahaleh M, Giovannini M, Matos C, Devière J. EUS-guided pancreaticogastrostomy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2002; 56: 128-33.
Prachayakul V, Aswakul P. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided interventions in special situations. World J. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2016; 8: 104-12.
Shimamura Y, Mosko J, Teshima C, May GR. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct intervention. Clin. Endosc. 2017; 50: 112-6.
Matsunami Y, Tsuchiya T, Itoi T. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage and rendezvous technique: a single-center large case series. Endosc. Ultrasound 2017; 6: S28.
Giovannini M. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage: ready for the prime time? Endosc. Ultrasound 2017; 6: 281-4.
Fujii LL, Topazian MD, Abu Dayyeh BK et al. EUS-guided pancreatic duct intervention: outcomes of a single tertiary-care referral center experience. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2013; 78: 854-64.
Kurihara T, Itoi T, Sofuni A et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided pancreatic duct drainage after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with malignant and benign pancreatic duct obstructions. Dig. Endosc. 2013; 25: 109-16.
Tyberg A, Sharaiha RZ, Kedia P et al. EUS-guided pancreatic drainage for pancreatic strictures after failed ERCP: a multicenter international collaborative study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2017; 85: 164-9.
Krishnamoorthi R, Jayaraj M, Mohan BP et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided pancreatic duct drainage - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2017; 85: AB143.
Fujii-Lau LL, Levy MJ. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2015; 22: 51-7.
Itoi T, Kasuya K, Sofuni A et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided pancreatic duct access: techniques and literature review of pancreatography, transmural drainage and rendezvous techniques. Dig. Endosc. 2013; 25: 241-52.
Matsunami Y, Itoi T, Sofuni A et al. Evaluation of a new stent for EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage: long-term follow-up outcome. Endosc. Int. Open 2018; 6: E505-12.
Uchida D, Kato H, Saragai Y et al. Indications for endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic drainage: for benign or malignant cases? Can. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018; 2018: 8216109.
Chen YI, Levy MJ, Moreels TG et al. An international multicenter study comparing EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage with enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde pancreatography after Whipple surgery. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2017; 85: 170-7.
Oh D, Park DH, Cho MK et al. Feasibility and safety of a fully covered self-expandable metal stent with antimigration properties for EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage: early and midterm outcomes (with video). Gastrointest. Endosc. 2016; 83: 366-73.
Will U, Reichel A, Fueldner F, Meyer F. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage for patients with symptomatic obstruction and enlargement of the pancreatic duct. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015; 21: 13140-51.
Ergun M, Aouattah T, Gillain C, Gigot JF, Hubert C, Deprez PH. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage of pancreatic duct obstruction: long-term outcome. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 518-25.
Barkay O, Sherman S, McHenry L et al. Therapeutic EUS-assisted endoscopic retrograde pancreatography after failed pancreatic duct cannulation at ERCP. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2010; 71: 1166-73.
Kahaleh M, Hernandez AJ, Tokar J et al. EUS-guided pancreaticogastrostomy: analysis of its efficacy to drain inaccessible pancreatic ducts. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2007; 65: 224-30.