Impact of CMV Reactivation, Treatment Approaches, and Immune Reconstitution in a Nonmyeloablative Tolerance Induction Protocol in Cynomolgus Macaques.
Animals
Antifungal Agents
/ pharmacology
Bone Marrow Transplantation
/ methods
Cytomegalovirus
/ immunology
Cytomegalovirus Infections
/ immunology
Disease Models, Animal
Graft Rejection
/ immunology
Immune Reconstitution
/ physiology
Immune Tolerance
Macaca fascicularis
Sirolimus
/ pharmacology
Transplant Recipients
Virus Activation
Journal
Transplantation
ISSN: 1534-6080
Titre abrégé: Transplantation
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0132144
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
7
8
2019
medline:
30
9
2020
entrez:
7
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a serious complication in immunosuppressed patients, specifically transplant recipients. Here, we describe the development and use of an assay to monitor the incidence and treatment of CMV viremia in a Cynomolgus macaque model of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for tolerance induction. We address the correlation between the course of viremia and immune reconstitution. Twenty-one animals received a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen. Seven received cyclosporine A for 28 days and 14 received rapamycin. A CMV polymerase chain reaction assay was developed and run twice per week to monitor viremia. Nineteen recipients were CMV seropositive before BMT. Immune reconstitution was monitored through flow cytometry and CMV viremia was tracked via quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Recipients developed CMV viremia during the first month post-BMT. Two animals developed uncontrollable CMV disease. CMV reactivation occurred earlier in cyclosporine A-treated animals compared with those receiving rapamycin. Post-BMT, T-cell counts remained significantly lower compared with pretransplant levels until CMV reactivation, at which point they increased during the viremic phase and approached pretransplant levels 3 months post-BMT. Management of CMV required treatment before viremia reached 10 000 copies/mL; otherwise clinical symptoms were observed. High doses of ganciclovir resolved the viremia, which could subsequently be controlled with valganciclovir. We developed an assay to monitor CMV in Cynomolgus macaques. CMV reactivation occurred in 100% of seropositive animals in this model. Rapamycin delayed CMV reactivation and ganciclovir treatment was effective at high doses. As in humans, CD8 T cells proliferated during CMV viremia.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a serious complication in immunosuppressed patients, specifically transplant recipients. Here, we describe the development and use of an assay to monitor the incidence and treatment of CMV viremia in a Cynomolgus macaque model of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for tolerance induction. We address the correlation between the course of viremia and immune reconstitution.
METHODS
Twenty-one animals received a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen. Seven received cyclosporine A for 28 days and 14 received rapamycin. A CMV polymerase chain reaction assay was developed and run twice per week to monitor viremia. Nineteen recipients were CMV seropositive before BMT. Immune reconstitution was monitored through flow cytometry and CMV viremia was tracked via quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
RESULTS
Recipients developed CMV viremia during the first month post-BMT. Two animals developed uncontrollable CMV disease. CMV reactivation occurred earlier in cyclosporine A-treated animals compared with those receiving rapamycin. Post-BMT, T-cell counts remained significantly lower compared with pretransplant levels until CMV reactivation, at which point they increased during the viremic phase and approached pretransplant levels 3 months post-BMT. Management of CMV required treatment before viremia reached 10 000 copies/mL; otherwise clinical symptoms were observed. High doses of ganciclovir resolved the viremia, which could subsequently be controlled with valganciclovir.
CONCLUSIONS
We developed an assay to monitor CMV in Cynomolgus macaques. CMV reactivation occurred in 100% of seropositive animals in this model. Rapamycin delayed CMV reactivation and ganciclovir treatment was effective at high doses. As in humans, CD8 T cells proliferated during CMV viremia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31385931
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002893
pmc: PMC6994365
mid: NIHMS1535357
pii: 00007890-202002000-00014
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antifungal Agents
0
Sirolimus
W36ZG6FT64
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
270-279Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : U19 AI131474
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK064819
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01 OD017949
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA013696
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : P30 DK063608
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 8;378(10):965
pubmed: 29514025
Rev Infect Dis. 1982 Nov-Dec;4(6):1119-32
pubmed: 6296961
J Immunotoxicol. 2016;13(1):64-76
pubmed: 25600312
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Aug 15;59(4):473-81
pubmed: 24850801
Am J Transplant. 2017 Mar;17(3):657-670
pubmed: 27500470
J Virol. 2011 Dec;85(24):12995-3009
pubmed: 21994460
Clin Transl Immunology. 2015 Mar 27;4(3):e35
pubmed: 25859390
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 21;377(25):2433-2444
pubmed: 29211658
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Feb;20(2):183-91
pubmed: 24333142
Blood. 2016 May 19;127(20):2427-38
pubmed: 26884374
Science. 2015 Jun 5;348(6239):aaa0698
pubmed: 26045439
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2008 Jun;197(2):109-15
pubmed: 18193454
Transplantation. 2000 Jun 15;69(11):2251-9
pubmed: 10868622
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015 Jul;70(7):515-23
pubmed: 26222822
G3 (Bethesda). 2013 Jul 08;3(7):1195-201
pubmed: 23696100
Clin Exp Immunol. 2012 Sep;169(3):292-301
pubmed: 22861369
J Infect Dis. 1986 Mar;153(3):478-88
pubmed: 3005424
Adv Virus Res. 2008;72:207-26
pubmed: 19081492
Am J Transplant. 2018 Dec;18(12):2885-2894
pubmed: 29603596
Comp Med. 2016;66(4):308-23
pubmed: 27538862
Virology. 2011 Mar 30;412(1):125-35
pubmed: 21272907
Transplant Proc. 2008 Jun;40(5):1407-10
pubmed: 18589118
J Infect Dis. 2000 Jan;181(1):165-75
pubmed: 10608763
Blood. 2010 Apr 15;115(15):3146-57
pubmed: 20160165
Transplantation. 2017 Feb;101(2):274-283
pubmed: 27846155
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Nov 1;43(9):1143-51
pubmed: 17029132
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Jan 1;52(1):49-57
pubmed: 21148519
Blood. 2001 Sep 1;98(5):1358-64
pubmed: 11520783
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Mar 1;46(5):732-40
pubmed: 18220478
Blood. 2001 Mar 1;97(5):1232-40
pubmed: 11222365
J Clin Virol. 2008 Mar;41(3):237-41
pubmed: 18203657
Am J Transplant. 2015 Mar;15(3):827-32
pubmed: 25648555
Immunogenetics. 2010 Dec;62(11-12):773-80
pubmed: 20882385
Transplant Proc. 2013 Jan-Feb;45(1):148-52
pubmed: 23375289
J Infect Dis. 2001 Mar 15;183(6):835-43
pubmed: 11237798
Blood. 1994 Apr 1;83(7):1971-9
pubmed: 8142663
J Virol. 2017 Jan 3;91(2):
pubmed: 27807227
N Engl J Med. 1995 Oct 19;333(16):1038-44
pubmed: 7675046
J Virus Erad. 2016 Oct 5;2(4):198-207
pubmed: 27781101
Blood. 2013 May 2;121(18):3745-58
pubmed: 23435462
Am J Transplant. 2011 Nov;11(11):2463-71
pubmed: 21827612
Immunology. 2011 Nov;134(3):326-40
pubmed: 21978002
Am J Transplant. 2010 Jun;10(6):1375-84
pubmed: 20486921
BMC Genomics. 2016 Apr 05;17:277
pubmed: 27044312