Droplet size and physicochemical property effects on herbicide efficacy of pre-emergence herbicides in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr).
adsorption
nozzle
soil applied
solubility
volatility
weed
Journal
Pest management science
ISSN: 1526-4998
Titre abrégé: Pest Manag Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100898744
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
09
04
2019
revised:
28
07
2019
accepted:
02
08
2019
pubmed:
7
8
2019
medline:
9
4
2020
entrez:
7
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Unlike post-emergence herbicides (POSTs), little is known about droplet size effect on pre-emergence herbicide (PRE) efficacy. Four nozzle types were used to apply different PRE herbicides on eight soybean fields in Missouri and Mississippi in 2017 and 2018, respectively. Pendimethalin, metribuzin, clomazone, imazethapyr and pyroxasulfone were selected based on their physicochemical characteristics (adsorption, volatility and solubility) and were sprayed using XR11002, ULD12002, TTI6011002, and TTI11002 nozzles. The XR nozzle produced the smallest droplet size (D The results indicate that droplet size does not affect PRE herbicide efficacy regardless of physicochemical herbicide properties including adsorption, volatility and solubility. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Unlike post-emergence herbicides (POSTs), little is known about droplet size effect on pre-emergence herbicide (PRE) efficacy. Four nozzle types were used to apply different PRE herbicides on eight soybean fields in Missouri and Mississippi in 2017 and 2018, respectively. Pendimethalin, metribuzin, clomazone, imazethapyr and pyroxasulfone were selected based on their physicochemical characteristics (adsorption, volatility and solubility) and were sprayed using XR11002, ULD12002, TTI6011002, and TTI11002 nozzles.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The XR nozzle produced the smallest droplet size (D
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The results indicate that droplet size does not affect PRE herbicide efficacy regardless of physicochemical herbicide properties including adsorption, volatility and solubility. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
Substances chimiques
Herbicides
0
Soil
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
737-746Informations de copyright
© 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
Références
Palmer EW, Shaw DR and Holloway JC Jr, Evaluation of soil-applied herbicides in sequential programs with CGA-277476 in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 13:271-275 (1999).
Hasty RF, Sprague CL and Hager AG, Weed control with fall and early-preplant herbicide applications in no-till soybean. Weed Technol 18:887-892 (2004).
Ennis WB and Williamson RE, Influence of droplet size on effectiveness of low-volume herbicidal sprays. Weeds 11:67-72 (1963).
Douglas G, The influence of size of spray droplets on the herbicidal activity of diquat and paraquat. Weed Res 8:205-212 (1968).
McKinlay KS, Brandt SA, Morse P and Ashford R, Droplet size and phytotoxicity of herbicides. Weed Sci 20:450-452 (1972).
McKinlay KS, Ashford R and Ford RJ, Effects of drop size, spray volume, and dosage on paraquat toxicity. Weed Sci 22:31-34 (1974).
Wolf TM, Caldwell BC, McIntyre GI and Hsiao AI, Effect of droplet size and herbicide concentration on absorption and translocation of 14C-2,4-D in oriental mustard (Sisymbrium orientale)1. Weed Sci 40:568-575 (1992).
Knoche M, Effect of droplet size and carrier volume on performance of foliage-applied herbicides. Crop Prot 13:163-178 (1994).
Liu SH, Campbell RA, Studens JA and Wagner RG, Absorption and translocation of glyphosate in Aspen (Populus tremoloides Michx.) as influenced by droplet size, droplet number and herbicide concentration. Weed Sci 44:482-488 (1996).
Etheridge RE, Womac AR and Mueller TC, Characterization of the spray droplet spectra and patters of four venturi type drift reduction nozzles. Weed Technol 13:765-770 (1999).
Smith DB, Askew SD, Morris WH, Shaw DR and Boyette M, Droplet size and leaf morphology effects on pesticide spray deposition. Trans ASAE 43:255-259 (2000).
Shaw DR, Morris WH, Webster EP and Smith DB, Effects of spray volume and droplet size on herbicide deposition and common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) control. Weed Technol 14:321-326 (2000).
Ramsdale BK and Messersmith CG, Drift-reducing nozzle effects on herbicide performance. Weed Technol 15:453-460 (2001).
Etheridge RE, Hart WE, Hayes RM and Mueller TC, Effect of venturi-type nozzles and application volume on postemergence herbicide efficacy. Weed Technol 15:75-80 (2001).
Feng PCC, Chiu T, Sammons D and Ryerse JS, Droplet size affects glyphosate retention, absorption and translocation in corn. Weed Sci 51:443-448 (2003).
Brown L, Soltani N, Shropshire C, Spieser H and Sikkema PH, Efficacy of four corn (Zea mays L.) herbicides when applied with flat fan and air induction nozzles. Weed Biol Manage 7:55-61 (2007).
Creech CF, Moraes JG, Henry RS, Luck JD and Kruger GR, The impact of spray droplet size on the efficacy of 2,4-D, atrazine, chlorimuronmethyl, dicamba, glufosinate, and saflufenacil. Weed Technol 30:573-586 (2016).
Butts TR, Samples CA, Franca LX, Dodds DM, Reynolds DB, Adams JW et al., Spray droplet size and carrier volume effect on dicamba and glufosinate efficacy. Pest Manag Sci 74:2020-2029 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4913.
Ferguson JC, Chechetto RG, Adkins SW, Hewitt AJ, Chauhan BS, Kruger GR et al., Effect of spray droplet size on herbicide efficacy on four winter annual grasses. Crop Prot 112:118-124 (2018).
Merry JC, The Effects of Droplet Size and Application Method on the Activity of Pre-Emergence Herbicides. PhD dissertation, Silwood Park, Sunninghill, Ascot, Berkshire: University of London, Imperial College, pp. 14-84 (1986).
Borger CPD, Riethmuller GP, Ashworth M, Minkey D, Hashem A and Powles SB, Increased carrier volume improves preemergence control of rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in zero-tillage seeding systems. Weed Technol 27:649-655 (2013).
Vogue PA, Kerle E.A, Jenkins JJ, OSU Extension Pesticide Properties Database. NPIC - National Pesticide Information Center (1994). Available http://npic.orst.edu/ingred/ppdmove.htm [20 April 2017].
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Estimating physical/chemical ad environmental fate properties with EPI SuiteTM (2012). Available https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-05/documents/05.pdf [20 April 2017].
Grains Research & Development Corporation, Pre-emergent herbicides, fact sheet. Understanding pre-emergent herbicides and how they interact with the environment (2015). Available http://grdc.com.au [10 March 2017]
Hornsby AG, Wauchope RD and Herner AE, Pesticide properties: vapor pressure, in Pesticide Properties in the Environment. Springer-Verlag New York, New York, pp. 9-10 (1996).
Wienhold BJ, Sadeghi AM and Gish TJ, Effect of starch encapsulation and temperature on volatilization of atrazine and alachlor. J Environ Qual 22:162-166 (1993).
Goss K-U, The air/surface adsorption equilibrium of organic compounds under ambient conditions. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 34:339-389 (2004).
Reichman R, Rolston DE, Yates SR and Skaggs TH, Diurnal variation of diazinon volatilization: soil moisture effects. Environ Sci Technol 45:2144-2149 (2011).
Schneider M, Endo S and Goss K-U, Volatilization of pesticides from the bare soil surface: evaluation of the humidity effect. J Environ Qual 42:844-851 (2013).
Lavorenti A, Comportamento dos herbicidas no meio ambiente, in Workshop Sobre Biodegradação. EMBRAPA, CNPMA, Campinas, SP, pp. 81-115 (1996).
Florence AT and Attwood D, Physicochemical principles of pharmacy, in Manufacture, Formulation and Clinical Use, 6th edn. London Pharmaceutical Press, London, UK, p. 139 (1981).
Richards JH, Solubility and dissolution rate, in Pharmaceutics the Science of Dosage Form Design, ed. by Aulton ME. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, p. 72 (1988).
Chu KR, Lee E, Jeong SH and Park ES, Effect of particle size on the dissolution behaviors of poorly water-soluble drugs. Arch Pharm Res 35:1187-1195 (2012).
Freed VH and Norris RO, Environmental and Other Factors in the Response of Plants to Herbicides. Oregon State Univ, Corvallis, OR, pp. 107-126 (1967).
Yu Y, Zhu H, Frantz JM, Reding ME, Chan KC and Ozkan HE, Evaporation and coverage area of pesticide droplets on hairy and waxy leaves. Biosyst Eng 104:324-334 (2009).
Holterman HJ, Kinetics and Evaporation of Water Drops in Air. Instituut voor Milieu- en Agritechniek, Wageningen, NL, IMAG report 2003-12, p. 67 (2003).
Dorr GJ, Kempthorne DM, Mayo LC, Forster WA, Zabkiewicz JA, McCue SW et al., Towards a model of spray-canopy interactions: interception, shatter, bounce and retention of droplets on horizontal leaves. Ecol Model 290:94-101 (2014).
Cock ND, Massinon M, Salah SOT and Lebeau F, Investigation on optimal spray properties for ground based agricultural applications using deposition and retention models. Biosyst Eng 162:99-111 (2017).
Al-Kaisi M and Yin X, Tillage and crop residue effects on soil carbon and carbon dioxide emission in corn-soybean rotations. J Environ Qual 34:437-445 (2005).
Brye KR, Cordell ML, Longer DE and Gbur EE, Residue management practice effects on soil surface properties in a young wheat-soybean double-crop system. J Sustainable Agric 29:121-150 (2007).
Ahrens WH, Herbicide Handbook of the Weed Science Society of America, 9th edn. Weed Science Society of America, Champaign (1994).
Shaner DL, Field dissipation of sulfentrazone and pendimethalin in Colorado. Weed Technol 26:633-637 (2012).
Meister RT, Farm Chemicals Handbook, Vol. 92. Meister Publishing Company, Willoughby, OH (1992).
Gangolli SD, The Dictionary of Substances and their Effects (DOSE): K-N Compounds, 2nd edn. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK (1999).
Gillespie WE, Czapar GF and Hager AG, Pesticide Fate in the Environment: A Guide for Field Inspectors. Illinois State Water Survey. Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois. Contract Report 2011-07, p. 12 (2011).
Schreiber F, Avila LA, Scherner A, Gehrke VR and Agostinetto D, Volatility of different formulations of clomazone herbicide. Planta Daninha 33:315-321 (2015).
Lyman WJ, Estimation of physical properties, in Environmental Exposure from Chemicals, Vol. I, ed. by Neely WB and Blau GE. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p. 31 (1985).
Minnesota Department of Agriculture, New active ingredient review (2013). Available https://mda.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/inline-files/nair-pyroxasulfone.pdf [28 April 2017].
Westra, EP, Adsorption, Leaching, and Dissipation of Pyroxasulfone and Two Chloroacetamide Herbicides. MSc dissertation, Fort Collins, Colorado: Colorado State University. p. 76 (2012).
Yamaji Y, Honda H, Hanai R and Inoue J, Soil and environmental factors affecting the efficacy of pyroxasulfone for weed control. J Pestic Sci 41:1-5 (2016).
Silva CMMDS and Fay EF, Agrotóxicos e meio ambiente. Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, Brasília, p. 400 (2004).
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Parameters of pesticides that influence processes in the soil (2000). Available http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/x2570e/X2570E06.htm [20 April 2017].
ASABE S572.1, Spray Nozzle Classification by Droplet Spectra. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, MI (2013).
Hewitt AJ, Valcore, DL, The Measurement, Prediction and Classification of Agricultural Sprays. ASAE Paper No. 981003, Proceeding of the ASAE Annual International Meeting, Orlando, FL, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI (1998).
Hewitt AJ, The importance of droplet size in agricultural spraying. Atom Sprays 7:235-244 (1997).
Ferguson JC, Chechetto RG, O'Donnell CC, Dorr GJ, Baker GJ, Powis KJ et al., Determining the drift potential of venturi nozzles compared with standard nozzles across three insecticide spray solutions in a wind tunnel. Pest Manag Sci 72:1460-1466 (2016).
Rasband WS, ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, (2016). Available https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/ [20 April 2017]
Tukey JW, Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, PA (1977).
Sidak Z, Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 62:626-633 (1967).
Wolf RE, Friedli C and Lauer B, Comparison of Spray Droplet Size and Coverage for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control. [Presentation]. ASABE Paper No. MC09207, 2005 Special Meeting Papers, Mid-Central Conference, Ames, IA (2009).
Dorr GJ, Hewitt AJ, Adkins SW, Hanan J, Zhang H and Noller B, A comparison of initial spray characteristics produced by agricultural nozzles. Crop Prot 53:109-117 (2013).
Ferguson JC, O'Donnell CC, Chauhan BS, Adkins SW, Kruger GR, Wang R et al., Determining the uniformity and consistency of droplet size across spray drift reducing nozzles in a wind tunnel. Crop Prot 76:1-6 (2015).
Henry RS, Fritz BK, Hoffmann WC and Kruger GR, The influence of nozzle type, operating pressure, and tank-mixture components on droplet characteristics and the EPA'S drift reduction rating, in Pesticide Formulation and Delivery Systems: 36th Volume, Emerging Trends Building on a Solid Foundation. ed. Poffenberger, C and Heuser, J. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, pp. 149-161 (2016).
Sparks DL, Environmental Soil Chemistry. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press. [STDF] Spray Drift Task Force (1997). A summary of chemigation application studies (1995). Available https://fyi.uwex.edu/manureirrigation/files/2013/04/AG_DRIFT_ChemApplicationStudiesPub.pdf [21 February 2017].
Arvidsson T, Bergström L and Kreuger J, Spray drift as influenced by meteorological and technical factors. Pest Manag Sci 67:586-598 (2011).
Linde CD, Physico-chemical properties and environmental fate of pesticides (1994). Available http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/emon/pubs/ehapreps/eh9403.pdf [10 March 2017].
De Jonge LW, De Jonge H, Moldrup P, Jacobsen OH and Chrinstensen BT, Sorption of prochloraz on primary soil organo-mineral size separates. J Environ Qual 29:206-213 (2000).
Đurović R and Gajić-Umiljendić ĐT, Effects of organic matter and clay content in soil on pesticide adsorption processes. Pestic Fitomed 24:51-57 (2009).
Liu LC and Cibes-Viadé HR, Adsorption of fluometuron, prometryne, Sencor, and 2,4-D by soils. J Agric Univ P R 57:286-293 (1973).
Sharom MS and Stephenson GR, Behavior and fate of metribuzin in eight Ontario soils. Weed Sci 24:153-160 (1976).
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Health Advisory Summary: Metribuzin. Office of Drinking Water, Washington, DC, pp. 1-115 (1992).
Dores EFGC, Carbo L, Ribeiro ML and De-Lamonica-Freire EM, Pesticide levels in ground and surface waters of Primavera do Leste region, Mato Grosso. Brazil. J Chromatogr Sci 46:585-590 (2008).
Jacobsen CS, Van der Keur P, Iversen BV, Rosenberg P, Barlebo HC, Torp S et al., Variation of MCPA, metribuzin, methyltriazine-amine and glyphosate degradation, sorption, mineralization and leaching in different soil horizons. Environ Pollut 156:794-802 (2008).
Elmore CD and McDaniel S, Identification and distribution of weedy spurges in Delta of Mississippi. Weed Sci 34:911-915 (1986).
Asgapour R, Ghorbani R, Khajeh-Hosseini M, Mohammadvand E and Chauhan BS, Germination of spotted Spurge (Chamaesyce maculata) seeds in response to different environmental factors. Weed Sci 63:502-510 (2015).
McCullough PE, McElroy JS, Yu J, Zhang H, Miller TB, Chen S et al., ALS-resistant spotted spurge (Chamaesyce maculata) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci 64:216-222 (2016).
Hope JH, Biology, Control and Spotted Spurge (Euphorbia maculata L.) in soybean. PhD dissertation. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee. p. 67 (1982).
Saari LL, Coterman JC and Thill DC, Herbicide resistance in plants: Biology and biochemistry, in , ed. by Powles S, Holtum J and Boca Raton FL. Lewis Publishers, pp. 83-139 (1994).
Bernasconi P, Woodworth AR, Rosen BA, Subramanian MV and Siehl DL, A naturally occurring point mutation confers broad range tolerance to herbicides that target acetolactate synthase. J Biol Chem 270:17381-17385 (1995).
Heap I, The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. (2018). Available http://www.weedscience.org [19 August 2018].
Hausman N, Tranel P, Riechers D, Maxwell D, Gonzini L and Hager A, Responses of an HPPD inhibitor-resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population to soil-residual herbicides. Weed Technol 27:704-711 (2013).
Yamaji Y, Honda H, Kobayashi M, Hanai R and Inoue J, Weed control efficacy of a novel herbicide, pyroxasulfone. J Pestic Sci 39:165-169 (2014).
Tidemann BD, Hall LM, Johnson EN, Beckie HJ, Sapsford KL, Willenborg CJ et al., Additive efficacy of soil-applied pyroxasulfone and sulfentrazone combinations. Can J Plant Sci 94:1245-1253 (2014).
Odero D and Wright A, Response of sweet corn to pyroxasulfone in high-organic-matter soils. Weed Technol 27:341-346 (2013).