Extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: initial experience and description of technique.
SP robot
extaperitoneal
minimally invasive surgery
prostate cancer
radical prostatectomy
single-port
Journal
BJU international
ISSN: 1464-410X
Titre abrégé: BJU Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100886721
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2020
01 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
7
8
2019
medline:
10
7
2020
entrez:
7
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To describe our technique of extraperitoneal single-port (SP) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and present our clinical experience with the first 10 cases. In all, 10 consecutive patients diagnosed with localised prostate cancer underwent extraperitoneal SP-RARP using the da Vinci SP® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Exclusion criteria included previous surgery through an infra-umbilical midline incision, prostate size >100 g, or preoperative evidence of extraprostatic disease. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon with previous experience of >3000 cases in robotic surgery. Demographics and perioperative information were collected including: operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, length of stay, and days with Foley catheter. The extraperitoneal SP-RARP is performed as follows. Firstly, a 3-cm incision ~2 cm below the umbilicus is made. Dissection of the extraperitoneal space is achieved using a kidney shaped Spacemaker™ balloon (Covidien, Dublin, Ireland), placed through the infra-umbilical incision caudally reaching the retropubic space. Thereafter, the balloon is deployed; the space is created and verified under direct vision with a laparoscopic endoscope. A GelPOINT® mini advanced access platform (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA) is inserted and a dedicated 25-mm multichannel port is placed with a 12-mm accessory laparoscopic port through the gel-seal cap into the same incision. The da Vinci SP surgical platform robot is docked with the patient in a supine position. RARP is performed replicating the technique previously described for multi-arm platforms or transperitoneal SP-RARP. No drain and no additional assistant ports were utilised. The patient's ages ranged between 48 and 70 years, and the mean preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 9 ng/mL. No conversions or intraoperative complications were recorded. The median (interquartile range) operative time was 197.5 (185.5-229.7) min. EBL ranged between 50 and 400 mL, six patients were discharged on the same day as the surgery and the median time with a Foley catheter after surgery was 8 days. Extraperitoneal SP-RARP is a feasible and safe surgical option to treat localised prostate cancer. In our early experience, promising results and possible advantages were found such as: a small single incision, no additional ports, no Trendelenburg positioning, minimal postoperative pain and use of opioids, and same day discharge. Further investigations need to be done to validate these advantages.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
182-189Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors BJU International © 2019 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L et al. ]Remote laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out with a robot. Report of a case] [Article in French]. Prog Urol 2000; 10: 520-3
Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2001; 87: 408-10
Freire MP, Choi WW, Lei Y, Carvas F, Hu JC. Overcoming the learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 2010; 37: 37-47
Boczko J, Madeb R, Golijanin D et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in obese patients. Can J Urol 2006; 13: 3169-73
Mohler JL, Armstrong AJ, Bahnson RR et al. Prostate cancer, version 1.2016. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2016;14:19-30
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 187-96
Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM et al. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101: 17-24
Kaouk J, Bertolo R, Eltemamy M, Garisto J. Single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: first clinical experience using the SP surgical system. Urology 2019; 124: 309
Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Autorino R et al. A novel robotic system for single-port urologic surgery: first clinical investigation. Eur Urol 2014; 66: 1033-43
Kallidonis P, Rai BP, Qazi H et al. Critical appraisal of literature comparing minimally invasive extraperitoneal and transperitoneal radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arab J Urol 2017; 15: 267-79
Kaouk J, Garisto J, Bertolo R. Robotic urologic surgical interventions performed with the single port dedicated platform: first clinical investigation. Eur Urol 2019; 75: 684-91
Lo IS, Lee HY, Chou YH et al. Robot-assisted extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy, single site plus two model. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018; 28: 140-4
White WM, Haber GP, Goel RK, Crouzet S, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH. Single-port urological surgery: single-center experience with the first 100 cases. Urology 2009; 74: 801-4
Sujata N, Tobin R, Mehta P, Girotra G. Optic nerve sheath diameter-guided extubation plan in obese patients undergoing robotic pelvic surgery in steep Trendelenburg position: a report of three cases. Indian J Anaesth 2018; 62: 896-9
Beauval JB, Rouminguié M, Filleron T et al. Biochemical recurrence-free survival and pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer. BMC Urol 2016; 16: 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-016-0146-6
Schroeck FR, Jacobs BL, Bhayani SB, Nguyen PL, Penson D, Hu J. Cost of new technologies in prostate cancer treatment: systematic review of costs and cost effectiveness of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and proton beam therapy. Eur Urol 2017; 72: 712-35