Prevalence and associated factors for dipstick microscopic hematuria in men.
Microscopic hematuria
Prevalence
Risk factors
Journal
BMC urology
ISSN: 1471-2490
Titre abrégé: BMC Urol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968571
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Aug 2019
06 Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
09
08
2018
accepted:
31
07
2019
entrez:
8
8
2019
pubmed:
8
8
2019
medline:
23
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Microscopic hematuria is a common incidental finding on routine urinalysis. Although there are no clear recommendations to perform routine urinalysis, some studies have shown that up to 50% of general practitioners continue to perform annual routine urinalysis regardless of age or risk factors. The aim of this study was to identify associated factors and prevalence of dipstick microscopic hematuria in the general male population presenting to an annual public men's health fair. We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data at an annual Men's Health fair from 2008 to 2013. Patient reported health questionnaires, basic physical exam including digital rectal exam, basic bloodwork and dipstick urinalysis data was examined. A total of 979 patients were reviewed. Of these, 850 provided a urine sample and were included in the final analysis. Seventy-three (8.6%) patients had positive hematuria on urinalysis. Average age in both groups was 55 years. Presence of microscopic hematuria was correlated with presence of diabetes and proteinuria with odds-ratio of 2.8 (1.3-5.8) and 2.9 (1.7-5.0) respectively on multivariate analysis. There was no significant correlation identified with age, hypertension, coronary artery disease, body-mass index, smoking, prostate specific antigen (PSA) or International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Limitation of this study is the lack of follow-up and knowledge of subsequent investigations of patients. Microscopic hematuria is a prevalent condition in the male population presenting to a health fair. The only factors associated with microscopic hematuria were diabetes and proteinuria. No association was found between hematuria and smoking, age, or lower urinary tract symptoms.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Microscopic hematuria is a common incidental finding on routine urinalysis. Although there are no clear recommendations to perform routine urinalysis, some studies have shown that up to 50% of general practitioners continue to perform annual routine urinalysis regardless of age or risk factors. The aim of this study was to identify associated factors and prevalence of dipstick microscopic hematuria in the general male population presenting to an annual public men's health fair.
METHOD
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data at an annual Men's Health fair from 2008 to 2013. Patient reported health questionnaires, basic physical exam including digital rectal exam, basic bloodwork and dipstick urinalysis data was examined.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 979 patients were reviewed. Of these, 850 provided a urine sample and were included in the final analysis. Seventy-three (8.6%) patients had positive hematuria on urinalysis. Average age in both groups was 55 years. Presence of microscopic hematuria was correlated with presence of diabetes and proteinuria with odds-ratio of 2.8 (1.3-5.8) and 2.9 (1.7-5.0) respectively on multivariate analysis. There was no significant correlation identified with age, hypertension, coronary artery disease, body-mass index, smoking, prostate specific antigen (PSA) or International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Limitation of this study is the lack of follow-up and knowledge of subsequent investigations of patients.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Microscopic hematuria is a prevalent condition in the male population presenting to a health fair. The only factors associated with microscopic hematuria were diabetes and proteinuria. No association was found between hematuria and smoking, age, or lower urinary tract symptoms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31387648
doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0505-1
pii: 10.1186/s12894-019-0505-1
pmc: PMC6683467
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
76Références
Am Fam Physician. 1999 Sep 15;60(4):1143-52, 1154
pubmed: 10507744
Can Urol Assoc J. 2009 Feb;3(1):77-80
pubmed: 19293985
J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):560-4
pubmed: 20018314
Can Urol Assoc J. 2011 Apr;5(2):97-101
pubmed: 21470533
CMAJ. 2012 Jan 10;184(1):E49-56
pubmed: 22105752
J Urol. 2012 Dec;188(6 Suppl):2473-81
pubmed: 23098784
World J Urol. 2012 Dec;30(6):847-52
pubmed: 23124847
Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Feb;88(2):129-38
pubmed: 23312369
Nephrology (Carlton). 2013 Aug;18(8):563-8
pubmed: 23714217
Dan Med J. 2014 Feb;61(2):A4781
pubmed: 24495888
BMJ. 1989 Oct 21;299(6706):1010-2
pubmed: 2511941
Int J Urol. 2015 Apr;22(4):389-93
pubmed: 25581719
JAMA. 1989 Sep 1;262(9):1214-9
pubmed: 2668582
Bladder Cancer. 2017 Jan 27;3(1):45-49
pubmed: 28149934
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Mar 8;292(6521):681-3
pubmed: 3081223
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994 Jul-Aug;3(5):439-43
pubmed: 7848421