Differential Diagnosis of Epithelioid Malignant Mesothelioma With Lung and Breast Pleural Metastasis: A Systematic Review Compared With a Standardized Panel of Antibodies-A New Proposal That May Influence Pathologic Practice.
Adenocarcinoma
/ diagnosis
Antibodies
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ analysis
Breast Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
/ methods
Lung Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Male
Mesothelioma
/ diagnosis
Mesothelioma, Malignant
Pleural Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Journal
Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine
ISSN: 1543-2165
Titre abrégé: Arch Pathol Lab Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7607091
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
8
8
2019
medline:
24
7
2020
entrez:
8
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pleural mesothelioma is a rare cancer with an often-challenging diagnosis because of its potential to be a great mimicker of many other tumors. Among them, primary lung and breast cancers are the 2 main causes of pleural metastasis. The development and application of targeted therapeutic agents have made it even more important to achieve an accurate diagnosis. In this setting, international guidelines have recommended the use of 2 positive and 2 negative immunohistochemical biomarkers. To define the most highly specific and sensitive minimum set of antibodies for routine practice to use for the separation of epithelioid malignant mesothelioma from lung and breast metastasis and to determine the most relevant expression cutoff. To provide information at different levels of expression of 16 mesothelial and epithelial biomarkers, we performed a systematic review of articles published between 1979 and 2017, and we compared those data to results from the Mesothelioma Telepathology Network (MESOPATH) of the standardized panel used in routine practice database since 1998. Our results indicate that the following panel of markers-calretinin (poly)/thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1; clone 8G7G3/1) and calretinin (poly)/estrogen receptor-α (ER-α; clone EP1)-should be recommended; ultimately, based on the MESOPATH database, we highlight their relevance which are the most sensitive and specific panel useful to the differential diagnosis at 10% cutoff. Highlighted by their relevance in the large cohort reported, we recommend 2 useful panels to the differential diagnosis at 10% cutoff.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31389715
doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0457-OA
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM