Efficiency of ODI and APDI of Kim's cephalometric analysis in a Latin American population with skeletal open bite.
Journal
Dental press journal of orthodontics
ISSN: 2177-6709
Titre abrégé: Dental Press J Orthod
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 101532240
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2019
01 Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
23
08
2017
accepted:
25
10
2018
entrez:
8
8
2019
pubmed:
8
8
2019
medline:
4
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The objective of this research was to demonstrate the efficiency of the overbite depth indicator (ODI) and the anteroposterior dysplasia indicator (APDI) from Kim's cephalometric analysis, regarding the determination of the vertical and sagittal patterns of Latin American individuals. Two hundred lateral cephalometric radiographs were selected and divided into four study groups, with 50 radiographs each, for carrying out a cross-sectional study. The control group included radiographs of balanced individuals, and the other three groups had lateral cephalometric radiographs of subjects with Class I, II and III malocclusions and with skeletal open bite. After the pilot test was performed to calibrate the investigator, the ODI and APDI were measured. Descriptive statistics were performed and the one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey HSD, or Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-test were used. Also a multiple linear regression was employed. Statistically significant differences were found for the ODI of all groups (p< 0.001), except between Class I group (65.87 ± 4.26) and Class II open bite group (67.19 ± 3.58), both with similar values to each other. For APDI, statistically significant differences were also found for all groups (p< 0.001). However, no statistically significant differences were found between the balanced group (83.18 ± 1.71) and Class I group with skeletal open bite (81.78 ± 2.69). ODI and APDI are reliable indicators to evaluate the sagittal and vertical patterns of an individual, demonstrating their efficiency when a Latin American population was evaluated.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31390449
pii: S2176-94512019000300046
doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.24.3.046-054.oar
pmc: PMC6677332
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
46-54Références
Eur J Orthod. 2000 Feb;22(1):75-83
pubmed: 10721248
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Jun;117(6):714-20
pubmed: 10842115
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992 Mar;101(3):234-43
pubmed: 1539550
Angle Orthod. 2005 May;75(3):311-9
pubmed: 15898366
Angle Orthod. 2006 Jul;76(4):612-8
pubmed: 16808567
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Feb;99(2):122-8
pubmed: 1990821
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jul;138(1):89-95
pubmed: 20620839
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Feb;34(1):114-8
pubmed: 21393373
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Apr;95(4):289-96
pubmed: 2705409
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Jul;150(1):71-7
pubmed: 27364208
Am J Orthod. 1978 Jun;73(6):619-33
pubmed: 276266
Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Sep-Oct;21(5):75-81
pubmed: 27901232
Angle Orthod. 1987 Oct;57(4):290-321
pubmed: 3479033
Am J Orthod. 1974 Jun;65(6):586-611
pubmed: 4524490
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 May;113(5):538-45
pubmed: 9598612