Long-term radiographic and clinical-functional outcomes of isolated, displaced, closed talar neck and body fractures treated by ORIF: the timing of surgical management.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Ankle Injuries
/ diagnostic imaging
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Fracture Dislocation
/ diagnostic imaging
Fracture Fixation, Internal
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Open Fracture Reduction
Retrospective Studies
Talus
/ diagnostic imaging
Time Factors
Time-to-Treatment
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
ORIF
Screw fixation
Talar body fractures
Talar fractures
Talar neck fractures
Talus
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Aug 2019
07 Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
27
07
2018
accepted:
24
07
2019
entrez:
9
8
2019
pubmed:
9
8
2019
medline:
14
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The main purpose of this retrospective case series study was to evaluate long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes of a consecutive series of patients diagnosed with isolated, displaced, closed talar neck or body fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Secondly, the aim was to verify the influence of the location of talar fractures on the outcomes, the prognostic value of the Hawkins sign, whether operative delays promote avascular necrosis (AVN) and if the fractures require emergent surgical management. From January 2007 to December 2012, at our institution, 31 patients underwent ORIF through the use of screws. On the basis of Inokuchi criteria, the injuries were divided between neck and body fractures, which were classified according to Hawkins and Sneppen, respectively. The patients included were divided into two groups in relation to fracture location and complexity. Radiographic assessment focused on reduction quality, bone healing, the Hawkins sign and post-traumatic arthritis (PTA) development. For the clinical evaluation, clinical-functional scores (AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Score; MFS; FFI-17; SF-36) and VAS were determined, and statistical analysis was performed. 27 patients, 19 males and 8 females, mean age 38.3 years, were included with an average follow-up period of 83.2 months (range 49-119). There were 9 neck and 19 body fractures; their reduction was anatomical or nearly anatomical in 22 cases, and all reached radiographic consolidation after a mean period of 3.4 months (range 1.7-7). The Hawkins sign was observed in 9 cases, in which necrosis did not develop. With a 0-11 day surgical timing interval, more than 60% of the patients obtained good or fair results with different scores, while 18 (66.7%) were completely satisfied (VAS: 9-10). The early complications included malunions (21.4%) and wound problems (25%); the late complications involved AVN (25%) and PTA (78.6%). Despite a high rate of long-term complications, satisfactory clinical results were achieved. Talar fracture location did not influence the outcomes, the Hawkins sign was confirmed as a positive prognostic factor, and operation timing did not influence AVN development. Hence, these injuries do not require emergent surgical management by ORIF.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The main purpose of this retrospective case series study was to evaluate long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes of a consecutive series of patients diagnosed with isolated, displaced, closed talar neck or body fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Secondly, the aim was to verify the influence of the location of talar fractures on the outcomes, the prognostic value of the Hawkins sign, whether operative delays promote avascular necrosis (AVN) and if the fractures require emergent surgical management.
METHODS
METHODS
From January 2007 to December 2012, at our institution, 31 patients underwent ORIF through the use of screws. On the basis of Inokuchi criteria, the injuries were divided between neck and body fractures, which were classified according to Hawkins and Sneppen, respectively. The patients included were divided into two groups in relation to fracture location and complexity. Radiographic assessment focused on reduction quality, bone healing, the Hawkins sign and post-traumatic arthritis (PTA) development. For the clinical evaluation, clinical-functional scores (AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Score; MFS; FFI-17; SF-36) and VAS were determined, and statistical analysis was performed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
27 patients, 19 males and 8 females, mean age 38.3 years, were included with an average follow-up period of 83.2 months (range 49-119). There were 9 neck and 19 body fractures; their reduction was anatomical or nearly anatomical in 22 cases, and all reached radiographic consolidation after a mean period of 3.4 months (range 1.7-7). The Hawkins sign was observed in 9 cases, in which necrosis did not develop. With a 0-11 day surgical timing interval, more than 60% of the patients obtained good or fair results with different scores, while 18 (66.7%) were completely satisfied (VAS: 9-10). The early complications included malunions (21.4%) and wound problems (25%); the late complications involved AVN (25%) and PTA (78.6%).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Despite a high rate of long-term complications, satisfactory clinical results were achieved. Talar fracture location did not influence the outcomes, the Hawkins sign was confirmed as a positive prognostic factor, and operation timing did not influence AVN development. Hence, these injuries do not require emergent surgical management by ORIF.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31391024
doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2738-2
pii: 10.1186/s12891-019-2738-2
pmc: PMC6686493
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
363Références
Foot Ankle Int. 2000 Dec;21(12):1023-9
pubmed: 11139032
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001 Mar-Apr;9(2):114-27
pubmed: 11281635
Orthop Clin North Am. 2001 Jan;32(1):53-64
pubmed: 11465133
J Orthop Trauma. 2002 Apr;16(4):213-9
pubmed: 11927801
Acta Orthop Scand. 2002 Jun;73(3):344-51
pubmed: 12143985
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Sep;85(9):1716-24
pubmed: 12954830
J Orthop Trauma. 2004 May-Jun;18(5):265-70
pubmed: 15105747
Orthop Clin North Am. 2004 Jul;35(3):383-95, xi
pubmed: 15271547
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Aug;86(8):1616-24
pubmed: 15292407
Injury. 2004 Sep;35 Suppl 2:SB10-22
pubmed: 15315875
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Sep;183(3):615-22
pubmed: 15333345
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Oct;86(10):2229-34
pubmed: 15466732
Foot Ankle Int. 2005 May;26(5):378-81
pubmed: 15913522
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
pubmed: 1593914
Foot Ankle Int. 2006 May;27(5):340-3
pubmed: 16701054
J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Jan;21(1):47-51
pubmed: 17211269
J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Sep;21(8):538-43
pubmed: 17805020
Injury. 2009 Feb;40(2):120-35
pubmed: 18439608
Int Orthop. 2011 Jan;35(1):93-9
pubmed: 20033158
Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Nov;31(11):987-93
pubmed: 21189192
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012;79(2):97-106
pubmed: 22538112
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Jun;98(4 Suppl):S48-55
pubmed: 22621831
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Jan-Feb;52(1):56-61
pubmed: 23153783
Orthop Clin North Am. 2013 Oct;44(4):521-8
pubmed: 24095068
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Nov;201(5):1087-92
pubmed: 24147480
Int Orthop. 2014 Jan;38(1):149-54
pubmed: 24297608
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Mar;134(3):383-8
pubmed: 24362495
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 5;96(3):192-7
pubmed: 24500580
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Jan-Feb;54(1):23-8
pubmed: 25459087
Foot (Edinb). 2015 Mar;25(1):12-8
pubmed: 25641642
Int J Surg. 2015 Jun;18:184-90
pubmed: 25937154
Radiographics. 2015 May-Jun;35(3):765-79
pubmed: 25969933
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Sep;29(9):385-92
pubmed: 26299809
Foot (Edinb). 2015 Dec;25(4):258-64
pubmed: 26481786
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Oct;30(10):572-8
pubmed: 27082938
Orthop Clin North Am. 2016 Jul;47(3):625-37
pubmed: 27241385
Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Jun;22(2):85-90
pubmed: 27301726
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Oct;37(10):1130-1136
pubmed: 27340258
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Nov - Dec;55(6):1130-1138
pubmed: 27524730
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Aug 22;11(1):92
pubmed: 27550340
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Jul - Aug;56(4):817-821
pubmed: 28633784
JBJS Rev. 2017 Jul;5(7):e2
pubmed: 28671875
Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Aug;24(4):282-290
pubmed: 29409210
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Mar 1;2018:6054021
pubmed: 29687005
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018 Sep;11(3):456-474
pubmed: 29974334
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Mar;60(2):143-56
pubmed: 417084
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970 Jul;52(5):991-1002
pubmed: 5479485
Foot Ankle Int. 1994 Jul;15(7):349-53
pubmed: 7951968
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 May;(290):87-95
pubmed: 8472475
Foot Ankle Int. 1996 Dec;17(12):748-50
pubmed: 8973897
Acta Orthop Scand. 1977;48(3):317-24
pubmed: 920125