Cancer-immune interactions in ER-positive breast cancers: PI3K pathway alterations and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.
Biomarkers, Tumor
Disease Susceptibility
/ immunology
Forkhead Transcription Factors
/ genetics
Gene Expression Profiling
Humans
Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating
/ immunology
Mutation
Neoplasm Staging
Neoplasms
/ etiology
Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase
/ genetics
Receptors, Estrogen
/ metabolism
T-Lymphocyte Subsets
/ immunology
Transcriptome
Luminal breast cancer
PI3K pathway
PIK3CA mutations
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Journal
Breast cancer research : BCR
ISSN: 1465-542X
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100927353
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 08 2019
07 08 2019
Historique:
received:
28
01
2019
accepted:
24
07
2019
entrez:
9
8
2019
pubmed:
9
8
2019
medline:
25
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is correlated with good prognosis and outcome after (immuno)therapy in triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer. However, the role of TILs in luminal breast cancer is less clear. Emerging evidence has now demonstrated that genetic aberrations in malignant cells influence the immune landscape of tumors. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) is the most common altered pathway in ER-positive breast cancer. It is unknown whether changes in the PI3K pathway result in a different composition of the breast tumor microenvironment. Here we present the retrospective analysis of a prospective randomized trial in ER-positive breast cancer on the prognostic and predictive value of specific tumor-associated lymphocytes in the context of PI3K alterations. We included 563 ER-positive tumors from a multicenter trial for stage I to III postmenopausal breast cancer patients, who were randomized to tamoxifen or no adjuvant therapy. The amount of CD8-, CD4-, and FOXP3-positive cells was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and quantified by imaging-analysis software. We analyzed the associations between PIK3CA hotspot mutations, PTEN expression, phosphorylated proteins of the PI3K and MAPK pathway (p-AKT, p-ERK1/2, p-4EBP1, p-p70S6K), and recurrence-free interval after adjuvant tamoxifen or no adjuvant treatment. CD8-positive lymphocytes were significantly more abundant in PIK3CA-mutated tumors (OR = 1.65; 95% CI 1.03-2.68). While CD4 and FOXP3 were not significantly associated with prognosis, patients with tumors classified as CD8-high had increased risk of recurrence (HR = 1.98; 95% CI 1.14-3.41; multivariable model including PIK3CA status, treatment arm, and other standard clinicopathological variables). Lymphocytes were more often present in tumors with increased PI3K downstream phosphorylation. This was most pronounced for FOXP3-positive cells. These exploratory analyses of a prospective trial in luminal breast cancer suggest high CD8 infiltration is associated with unfavorable outcome and that PI3K pathway alterations might be associated with the composition of the tumor microenvironment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31391067
doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1176-2
pii: 10.1186/s13058-019-1176-2
pmc: PMC6686400
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
FOXP3 protein, human
0
Forkhead Transcription Factors
0
Receptors, Estrogen
0
Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase
EC 2.7.1.137
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
90Références
Acta Inform Med. 2016 Feb;24(1):38-41
pubmed: 27041809
Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Jan 27;16(1):R13
pubmed: 24467828
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Jun 15;24(12):2804-2811
pubmed: 29559561
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Oct 1;2(10):1354-1360
pubmed: 27355489
Ann Oncol. 2014 Aug;25(8):1536-43
pubmed: 24915873
Oncogene. 2009 Jan 15;28(2):306-12
pubmed: 18850006
Lancet. 2013 Mar 9;381(9869):805-16
pubmed: 23219286
Transl Oncol. 2016 Apr;9(2):114-123
pubmed: 27084427
Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Sep 06;16(5):432
pubmed: 25193543
J Immunol. 2005 Mar 1;174(5):2591-601
pubmed: 15728465
Science. 2011 Mar 25;331(6024):1565-70
pubmed: 21436444
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Feb;149(3):587-96
pubmed: 25616355
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 16;380(20):1929-1940
pubmed: 31091374
Oncoimmunology. 2017 Apr 28;6(6):e1320626
pubmed: 28680756
Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Jan 21;16(1):R6
pubmed: 24447434
N Engl J Med. 1971 Aug 5;285(6):324-31
pubmed: 4934568
Cell. 2015 Jan 15;160(1-2):48-61
pubmed: 25594174
Cancer Discov. 2017 Nov;7(11):1320-1335
pubmed: 28790030
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016 Dec;35(4):515-524
pubmed: 27896521
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 May;127(1):99-108
pubmed: 20556505
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Feb;50(3):544-52
pubmed: 24332571
Psychol Rep. 1966 Aug;19(1):3-11
pubmed: 5942109
Stat Methods Med Res. 2006 Dec;15(6):525-45
pubmed: 17260922
Mol Cancer Res. 2015 Mar;13(3):493-501
pubmed: 25351767
BMC Cancer. 2008 Feb 23;8:57
pubmed: 18294387
Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Apr;45:87-96
pubmed: 26995633
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Aug;171(1):65-74
pubmed: 29766362
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1991 Jun;35(2):141-50
pubmed: 1914452
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jul;18(7):904-916
pubmed: 28576675
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):40-50
pubmed: 29233559
Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 15;77(22):6340-6352
pubmed: 28947417
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Nov;130(2):645-55
pubmed: 21717105
J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 20;29(15):1949-55
pubmed: 21483002
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jul;158(2):307-21
pubmed: 27369359
Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 14;5:15179
pubmed: 26462617
Br J Cancer. 2018 Oct;119(7):832-839
pubmed: 30287915
Histopathology. 2011 Jun;58(7):1107-16
pubmed: 21707712
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 09;10(10):e0140293
pubmed: 26452060
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jul 24;18(1):761
pubmed: 30041599
J Exp Med. 2005 Apr 4;201(7):1061-7
pubmed: 15809351
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):87-100
pubmed: 29223745
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr;13(4):228-41
pubmed: 26667975
Cell. 2017 Nov 30;171(6):1301-1315.e14
pubmed: 29195074
Lancet. 2011 Aug 27;378(9793):771-84
pubmed: 21802721