Three-Month Retention of Basic Life Support with an Automated External Defibrillator Using a Two-Stage versus Four-Stage Teaching Technique.
Journal
BioMed research international
ISSN: 2314-6141
Titre abrégé: Biomed Res Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101600173
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
31
08
2018
accepted:
09
06
2019
entrez:
9
8
2019
pubmed:
9
8
2019
medline:
10
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Resuscitation training increases bystander's ability to perform basic life support (BLS) with an automated external defibrillator (AED) immediately after training. However, several studies indicate that resuscitation skills decay rapidly. This study evaluates retention of BLS/AED skills three months after an initial study comparing acquisition of BLS/AED skills among laypersons immediately after training with a two-stage versus four-stage teaching technique. There was no difference in retention of BLS/AED skills (pass rate 10.8% versus 10.9%, respectively, p=1) three months after training. Total average number of skills adequately performed (of 17) was 13.3 versus 13.7 among laypersons trained with a two-stage and a four-stage technique, respectively. No difference was found in quality of chest compressions and rescue breaths between the two groups. Three months after training, this study found no difference in retention of BLS/AED skills among laypersons taught using a two-stage compared to a four-stage teaching technique.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31392207
doi: 10.1155/2019/1394972
pmc: PMC6662483
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1394972Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Health Aarhus University, The Laerdal Foundation for Acute Medicine, The Lundbeck Foundation, The Moller Foundation, and Fabrikant Karl G. Andersens (Anderssons) Fond supported this study financially but did not have any influence on the study design, analysis, or interpretation of data, nor on the conclusion of the study.
Références
Resuscitation. 2002 May;53(2):179-87
pubmed: 12009222
Circulation. 2003 Nov 18;108(20):2575-94
pubmed: 14623795
Resuscitation. 2004 Jan;60(1):17-28
pubmed: 15002485
Resuscitation. 2010 Jun;81(6):691-4
pubmed: 20347208
Hong Kong Med J. 2010 Jun;16(3):165-70
pubmed: 20519751
Resuscitation. 2010 Oct;81 Suppl 1:e1-25
pubmed: 20956042
Resuscitation. 2010 Dec;81(12):1607-8
pubmed: 20961678
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;25(1):18-24
pubmed: 27203452