Association of Perioperative Opioid-Sparing Multimodal Analgesia With Narcotic Use and Pain Control After Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction.
Journal
JAMA facial plastic surgery
ISSN: 2168-6092
Titre abrégé: JAMA Facial Plast Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589532
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Sep 2019
01 Sep 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
9
8
2019
medline:
18
2
2020
entrez:
9
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
An increase in narcotic prescription patterns has contributed to the current opioid epidemic in the United States. Opioid-sparing perioperative analgesia represents a means of mitigating the risk of opioid dependence while providing superior perioperative analgesia. To assess whether multimodal analgesia (MMA) is associated with reduced narcotic use and improved pain control compared with traditional narcotic-based analgesics at discharge and in the immediate postoperative period after free flap reconstructive surgery. This retrospective cohort study assessed a consecutive sample of 65 patients (28 MMA, 37 controls) undergoing free flap reconstruction of a through-and-through mucosal defect within the head and neck region at a tertiary academic referral center from June 1, 2017, to November 30, 2018. Patients and physicians were not blinded to the patients' analgesic regimen. Patients' clinical courses were followed up for 30 days postoperatively. Patients were administered a preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative analgesia regimen consisting of scheduled and as-needed neuromodulating and anti-inflammatory medications, with narcotic medications reserved for refractory cases. Control patients were administered traditional narcotic-based analgesics as needed. Narcotic doses administered during the perioperative period and at discharge were converted to morphine-equivalent doses (MEDs) for comparison. Postoperative Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale pain scores (ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain imaginable]) were collected for the first 72 hours postoperatively as a patient-reported means of analyzing effectiveness of analgesia. A total of 28 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.1 [12.3] years; 17 [61%] male) were included in the MMA group and 37 (mean [SD] age, 65.0 [11.0] years; 22 [59%] male) in the control group. The number of MEDs administered postoperatively was 10.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 2.7-23.1) in the MMA cohort and 89.6 (IQR, 60.0-104.5) in the control cohort (P < .001). Mean (SD) Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale pain scores postoperatively were 2.05 (1.41) in the MMA cohort and 3.66 (1.99) in the control cohort (P = .001). Median number of MEDs prescribed at discharge were 0 (IQR, 0-18.8) in the MMA cohort and 300.0 (IQR, 262.5-412.5) in the control cohort (P < .001). The findings suggest that after free flap reconstruction, MMA is associated with reduced narcotic use at discharge and in the immediate postoperative period and with superior analgesia as measured by patient-reported pain scores. Patients receiving MMA achieved improved pain control, and the number of narcotic prescriptions in circulation were reduced. 3.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31393513
pii: 2740677
doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0612
pmc: PMC6692678
doi:
Substances chimiques
Narcotics
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
446-451Références
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005 Apr;17(2):65-8
pubmed: 15840990
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Aug;135(2):182-8
pubmed: 16890065
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Sep;155(3):508-13
pubmed: 27188704
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1993 May;102(5):342-8
pubmed: 7683853
Anesthesiology. 2005 Dec;103(6):1296-304
pubmed: 16306743
Pain Med. 2013 Jan;14(1):110-23
pubmed: 23137169
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2017 Feb;42(1):27-38
pubmed: 28019014
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Nov 1;144(11):1023-1029
pubmed: 30027221
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Apr;26(2):71-77
pubmed: 29432221
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 May-Jun;31(3):237-47
pubmed: 16701190
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Sep;27(9):903-908
pubmed: 28742427
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Aug;135(2):175-81
pubmed: 16890064
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 08;(4):CD004602
pubmed: 18843665
Perspect Clin Res. 2014 Oct;5(4):172-7
pubmed: 25276627
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 May 2;47(1):29
pubmed: 29720267
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jun;40(3):196-9
pubmed: 21518639
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 1;152(7):691-697
pubmed: 28564673
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Nov;70(11):1543-1546
pubmed: 28822648
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Mar;133(3 Suppl):130
pubmed: 25942224
Hong Kong Med J. 2012 Feb;18(1):30-4
pubmed: 22302908
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Mar;110(3):432-7
pubmed: 23220855
Pain Physician. 2012 Jul;15(3 Suppl):ES9-38
pubmed: 22786464
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Mar 1;143(3):292-303
pubmed: 27737447
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Jul;128(7):829-32
pubmed: 12117345
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Mar;160(3):380-387
pubmed: 29807503
JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):292-298
pubmed: 28097305
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 Mar;25(3):276-83
pubmed: 12614962
Anesth Analg. 2004 Aug;99(2):375-8, table of contents
pubmed: 15271709
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Mar;133(3):741-55
pubmed: 24572864
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Dec 1;143(12):1207-1212
pubmed: 29049548
Anesth Analg. 2017 Nov;125(5):1784-1792
pubmed: 29049123
Arch Surg. 2009 Oct;144(10):961-9
pubmed: 19841366
J Pain. 2016 May;17(5):561-8
pubmed: 26828802
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007 Mar-Apr;9(2):120-4
pubmed: 17372066
N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 3;355(5):528-9
pubmed: 16885563
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Mar;271(3):439-43
pubmed: 23616139
Can J Anaesth. 2015 Feb;62(2):203-18
pubmed: 25501696