Systematic review of body image measures.

Body Image / psychology Humans Psychometrics Reproducibility of Results Self Report Surveys and Questionnaires
Body image Clinical practice Measurement properties Psychometric Self-report questionnaire Systematic review

Journal

Body image
ISSN: 1873-6807
Titre abrégé: Body Image
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101222431

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Historique:
received: 04 12 2018
revised: 14 06 2019
accepted: 14 06 2019
pubmed: 9 8 2019
medline: 18 12 2019
entrez: 9 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This systematic review synthesizes and critically appraises measurement properties of influential body image measures. Eight measures that met the definition of an assessment of body image (i.e., an individual's cognitive or affective evaluation of their body or appearance with a positive or negative valence), and scored high on systematic expert priority ranking, were included. These measures were: the Body Appreciation Scale (original BAS and BAS-2), the Body Esteem Scale for Adolescents and Adults, the Body Shape Questionnaire, the Centre for Appearance Research Valence Scale, the Drive for Muscularity Scale, two subscales of the Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire, one subscale of the Eating Disorder Inventory 3, and two subscales of the Multidimensional Body Relations Questionnaire. Articles assessing these scales' psychometric properties (N = 136) were evaluated for their methodological quality using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist, and a best evidence synthesis was performed. The results supported the majority of measures in terms of reliability and validity; however, suitability varied across populations, and some measurement properties were insufficiently evaluated. The measures are discussed in detail, including recommendations for their future use in research and clinical practice.

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.06.006 PMID: 31394462
pubmed: 31394462
pii: S1740-1445(18)30550-3
doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.06.006
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

170-211

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Johanna Kling (J)

Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Box 500, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden. Electronic address: johanna.kling@psy.gu.se.

Linda Kwakkenbos (L)

Behavioural Science Institute, Clinical Psychology, Radboud University, Postbus 9104, 6500, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: kwakkenbosL@gmail.com.

Phillippa C Diedrichs (PC)

Centre for Appearance Research, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS161QY, UK. Electronic address: phillippa.diedrichs@uwe.ac.uk.

Nichola Rumsey (N)

Centre for Appearance Research, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS161QY, UK. Electronic address: nicholarumsey@gmail.com.

Ann Frisén (A)

Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Box 500, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden. Electronic address: ann.frisen@psy.gu.se.

Maria Piedade Brandão (MP)

School of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal; Cintesis, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal. Electronic address: mpiedade@ua.pt.

Anabela G Silva (AG)

School of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal; Cintesis, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal. Electronic address: asilva@ua.pt.

Barbara Dooley (B)

School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. Electronic address: barbara.dooley@ucd.ie.

Rachel F Rodgers (RF)

APPEAR, Department of Applied Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, USA; Department of Psychiatric Emergency & Acute Care, Lapeyronie Hospital, CHRU Montpellier, France. Electronic address: r.rodgers@northeastern.edu.

Amanda Fitzgerald (A)

School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. Electronic address: amanda.fitzgerald@ucd.ie.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female

Evaluation of Low-Value Services Across Major Medicare Advantage Insurers and Traditional Medicare.

Ciara Duggan, Adam L Beckman, Ishani Ganguli et al.
1.00
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C

Effectiveness of Virtual Yoga for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Hallie Tankha, Devyn Gaskins, Amanda Shallcross et al.
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH

questionsmedicales.fr › Phénomènes psychologiques › Processus mentaux › Perception › Image du corps › Systematic review of body image measures.
questionsmedicales.fr › Eucaryotes › Animaux › Chordés › Vertébrés › Mammifères › Eutheria › Primates › Haplorhini › Catarrhini › Hominidae › Humains › Systematic review of body image measures.
questionsmedicales.fr › Disciplines et activités comportementales › Tests psychologiques › Psychométrie › Systematic review of body image measures.
questionsmedicales.fr › Environnement et santé publique › Santé publique › Méthodes épidémiologiques › Méthodologie en recherche épidémiologique › Reproductibilité des résultats › Systematic review of body image measures.
questionsmedicales.fr › Environnement et santé publique › Santé publique › Méthodes épidémiologiques › Collecte de données › Enquêtes et questionnaires › Autorapport › Systematic review of body image measures.
questionsmedicales.fr › Environnement et santé publique › Santé publique › Méthodes épidémiologiques › Collecte de données › Enquêtes et questionnaires › Systematic review of body image measures.