Immunogenicity of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced tumors.


Journal

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 08 2019
Historique:
received: 13 02 2019
accepted: 04 07 2019
entrez: 10 8 2019
pubmed: 10 8 2019
medline: 29 8 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Pembrolizumab is a potent, humanized, monoclonal anti-programmed death 1 antibody that has demonstrated effective antitumor activity and acceptable safety in multiple tumor types. Therapeutic biologics can result in the development of antidrug antibodies (ADAs), which may alter drug clearance and neutralize target binding, potentially reducing drug efficacy; such immunogenicity may also result in infusion reactions, anaphylaxis, and immune complex disorders. Pembrolizumab immunogenicity and its impact on exposure, safety, and efficacy was assessed in this study. Pembrolizumab immunogenicity was assessed in 3655 patients with advanced or metastatic cancer treated in 12 clinical studies. Patients with melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer, urothelial cancer, and Hodgkin lymphoma were treated with pembrolizumab at 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks, or 200 mg every 3 weeks. An additional study involving 496 patients with stage III melanoma treated with 200 mg adjuvant pembrolizumab every 3 weeks after complete resection was analyzed separately. Of 3655 patients, 2000 were evaluable for immunogenicity analysis, 36 (1.8%) were treatment-emergent (TE) ADA-positive; 9 (0.5%) of these TE-positive patients had antibodies with neutralizing capacity. The presence of pembrolizumab-specific ADAs did not impact pembrolizumab exposure, nor did pembrolizumab immunogenicity affect the incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) or infusion-related reactions. There was no clear relationship between the presence of pembrolizumab-specific ADAs and changes in tumor size across treatment regimens. Of the 496 patients treated with pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy, 495 were evaluable, 17 (3.4%) were TE ADA-positive; none had neutralizing antibodies. The incidence of TE (neutralizing positive) ADAs against pembrolizumab was low in patients with advanced tumors. Furthermore, immunogenicity did not appear to have any clinically relevant effects on the exposure, safety, or efficacy of pembrolizumab. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01295827 (February 15, 2011), NCT01704287 (October 11, 2012), NCT01866319 (May 31, 2013), NCT01905657 (July 23, 2013), NCT02142738 (May 20, 2014), NCT01848834 (May 8, 2013), NCT02255097 (October 2, 2014), NCT02460198 (June 2, 2015), NCT01953692 (October 1, 2013), NCT02453594 (May 25, 2015), NCT02256436 (October 3, 2014), NCT02335424 (January 9, 2015), NCT02362594 (February 13, 2015).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Pembrolizumab is a potent, humanized, monoclonal anti-programmed death 1 antibody that has demonstrated effective antitumor activity and acceptable safety in multiple tumor types. Therapeutic biologics can result in the development of antidrug antibodies (ADAs), which may alter drug clearance and neutralize target binding, potentially reducing drug efficacy; such immunogenicity may also result in infusion reactions, anaphylaxis, and immune complex disorders. Pembrolizumab immunogenicity and its impact on exposure, safety, and efficacy was assessed in this study.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Pembrolizumab immunogenicity was assessed in 3655 patients with advanced or metastatic cancer treated in 12 clinical studies. Patients with melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer, urothelial cancer, and Hodgkin lymphoma were treated with pembrolizumab at 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks, or 200 mg every 3 weeks. An additional study involving 496 patients with stage III melanoma treated with 200 mg adjuvant pembrolizumab every 3 weeks after complete resection was analyzed separately.
RESULTS
Of 3655 patients, 2000 were evaluable for immunogenicity analysis, 36 (1.8%) were treatment-emergent (TE) ADA-positive; 9 (0.5%) of these TE-positive patients had antibodies with neutralizing capacity. The presence of pembrolizumab-specific ADAs did not impact pembrolizumab exposure, nor did pembrolizumab immunogenicity affect the incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) or infusion-related reactions. There was no clear relationship between the presence of pembrolizumab-specific ADAs and changes in tumor size across treatment regimens. Of the 496 patients treated with pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy, 495 were evaluable, 17 (3.4%) were TE ADA-positive; none had neutralizing antibodies.
CONCLUSIONS
The incidence of TE (neutralizing positive) ADAs against pembrolizumab was low in patients with advanced tumors. Furthermore, immunogenicity did not appear to have any clinically relevant effects on the exposure, safety, or efficacy of pembrolizumab.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01295827 (February 15, 2011), NCT01704287 (October 11, 2012), NCT01866319 (May 31, 2013), NCT01905657 (July 23, 2013), NCT02142738 (May 20, 2014), NCT01848834 (May 8, 2013), NCT02255097 (October 2, 2014), NCT02460198 (June 2, 2015), NCT01953692 (October 1, 2013), NCT02453594 (May 25, 2015), NCT02256436 (October 3, 2014), NCT02335424 (January 9, 2015), NCT02362594 (February 13, 2015).

Identifiants

pubmed: 31395089
doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0663-4
pii: 10.1186/s40425-019-0663-4
pmc: PMC6686242
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological 0
pembrolizumab DPT0O3T46P

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02362594', 'NCT02460198', 'NCT01866319', 'NCT02255097', 'NCT01953692', 'NCT02453594', 'NCT02256436', 'NCT01905657', 'NCT01704287', 'NCT02142738', 'NCT01295827', 'NCT02335424', 'NCT01848834']

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

212

Références

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Sep 17;99(19):12293-7
pubmed: 12218188
Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2002 Dec;3(4):349-60
pubmed: 12463417
N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 13;358(11):1109-17
pubmed: 18337601
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2009 May;21(3):211-5
pubmed: 19399992
Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr;106(4):685-98
pubmed: 21427713
Nat Rev Cancer. 2012 Mar 22;12(4):252-64
pubmed: 22437870
Pharm Res. 2012 Dec;29(12):3384-92
pubmed: 22903525
Cancer Med. 2013 Oct;2(5):662-73
pubmed: 24403232
AAPS J. 2014 May;16(3):488-98
pubmed: 24682765
AAPS J. 2014 Jul;16(4):658-73
pubmed: 24764037
Drugs Today (Barc). 2015 Jan;51(1):7-20
pubmed: 25685857
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Oct 1;21(19):4286-93
pubmed: 25977344
AAPS J. 2016 Mar;18(2):395-403
pubmed: 26721560
Breast Cancer Res. 2016 Jan 26;18(1):10
pubmed: 26810608

Auteurs

Marianne J H van Vugt (MJH)

Integrated Drug Development, Certara, Oss, Netherlands.

Julie A Stone (JA)

Quantitative Pharmacology, Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Rik H J M M De Greef (RHJMM)

Integrated Drug Development, Certara, Oss, Netherlands.

Ellen S Snyder (ES)

Quantitative Pharmacology, Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Leslie Lipka (L)

Quantitative Pharmacology, Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

David C Turner (DC)

Quantitative Pharmacology, Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Anne Chain (A)

Quantitative Pharmacology, Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Mallika Lala (M)

Quantitative Pharmacology, Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Mengyao Li (M)

Quantitative Pharmacology, Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Seth H Robey (SH)

Quantitative Pharmacology, Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Anna G Kondic (AG)

Decision Analytics, Certara, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Dinesh De Alwis (D)

Quantitative Pharmacology, Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Kapil Mayawala (K)

Quantitative Pharmacology, Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Lokesh Jain (L)

Quantitative Pharmacology, Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Tomoko Freshwater (T)

Quantitative Pharmacology, Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA. tomoko.freshwater@merck.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH