Phase Ib Study of Combination Therapy with MEK Inhibitor Binimetinib and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Inhibitor Buparlisib in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors with RAS/RAF Alterations.
Binimetinib
Buparlisib
Ovarian cancer
Phase Ib
RAS/RAF
Journal
The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2020
01 2020
Historique:
received:
16
04
2019
accepted:
18
06
2019
pubmed:
10
8
2019
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
10
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This multicenter, open-label, phase Ib study investigated the safety and efficacy of binimetinib (MEK inhibitor) in combination with buparlisib (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase [PI3K] inhibitor) in patients with advanced solid tumors with RAS/RAF alterations. Eighty-nine patients were enrolled in the study. Eligible patients had advanced solid tumors with disease progression after standard therapy and/or for which no standard therapy existed. Evaluable disease was mandatory, per RECIST version 1.1 and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2. Binimetinib and buparlisib combinations were explored in patients with KRAS-, NRAS-, or BRAF-mutant advanced solid tumors until the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) were defined. The expansion phase comprised patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant, advanced non-small cell lung cancer, after progression on an EGFR inhibitor; advanced RAS- or BRAF-mutant ovarian cancer; or advanced non-small cell lung cancer with KRAS mutation. At data cutoff, 32/89 patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. RP2D for continuous dosing was buparlisib 80 mg once daily/binimetinib 45 mg twice daily. The toxicity profile of the combination resulted in a lower dose intensity than anticipated. Six (12.0%) patients with RAS/BRAF-mutant ovarian cancer achieved a partial response. Pharmacokinetics of binimetinib were not altered by buparlisib. Pharmacodynamic analyses revealed downregulation of pERK and pS6 in tumor biopsies. Although dual inhibition of MEK and the PI3K pathways showed promising activity in RAS/BRAF ovarian cancer, continuous dosing resulted in intolerable toxicities beyond the dose-limiting toxicity monitoring period. Alternative schedules such as pulsatile dosing may be advantageous when combining therapies. Because dysregulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathways are both frequently involved in resistance to current targeted therapies, dual inhibition of both pathways may be required to overcome resistance mechanisms to single-agent tyrosine kinase inhibitors or to treat cancers with driver mutations that cannot be directly targeted. A study investigating the safety and efficacy of combination binimetinib (MEK inhibitor) and buparlisib (PI3K inhibitor) in patients harboring alterations in the RAS/RAF pathway was conducted. The results may inform the design of future combination therapy trials in patients with tumors harboring mutations in the PI3K and MAPK pathways.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
This multicenter, open-label, phase Ib study investigated the safety and efficacy of binimetinib (MEK inhibitor) in combination with buparlisib (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase [PI3K] inhibitor) in patients with advanced solid tumors with RAS/RAF alterations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Eighty-nine patients were enrolled in the study. Eligible patients had advanced solid tumors with disease progression after standard therapy and/or for which no standard therapy existed. Evaluable disease was mandatory, per RECIST version 1.1 and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2. Binimetinib and buparlisib combinations were explored in patients with KRAS-, NRAS-, or BRAF-mutant advanced solid tumors until the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) were defined. The expansion phase comprised patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant, advanced non-small cell lung cancer, after progression on an EGFR inhibitor; advanced RAS- or BRAF-mutant ovarian cancer; or advanced non-small cell lung cancer with KRAS mutation.
RESULTS
At data cutoff, 32/89 patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. RP2D for continuous dosing was buparlisib 80 mg once daily/binimetinib 45 mg twice daily. The toxicity profile of the combination resulted in a lower dose intensity than anticipated. Six (12.0%) patients with RAS/BRAF-mutant ovarian cancer achieved a partial response. Pharmacokinetics of binimetinib were not altered by buparlisib. Pharmacodynamic analyses revealed downregulation of pERK and pS6 in tumor biopsies.
CONCLUSION
Although dual inhibition of MEK and the PI3K pathways showed promising activity in RAS/BRAF ovarian cancer, continuous dosing resulted in intolerable toxicities beyond the dose-limiting toxicity monitoring period. Alternative schedules such as pulsatile dosing may be advantageous when combining therapies.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
Because dysregulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathways are both frequently involved in resistance to current targeted therapies, dual inhibition of both pathways may be required to overcome resistance mechanisms to single-agent tyrosine kinase inhibitors or to treat cancers with driver mutations that cannot be directly targeted. A study investigating the safety and efficacy of combination binimetinib (MEK inhibitor) and buparlisib (PI3K inhibitor) in patients harboring alterations in the RAS/RAF pathway was conducted. The results may inform the design of future combination therapy trials in patients with tumors harboring mutations in the PI3K and MAPK pathways.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31395751
pii: theoncologist.2019-0297
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0297
pmc: PMC6964137
doi:
Substances chimiques
Aminopyridines
0
Benzimidazoles
0
Morpholines
0
NVP-BKM120
0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
binimetinib
181R97MR71
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01363232']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase I
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e160-e169Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press.
Références
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Nov;5(11):875-85
pubmed: 15520807
Sci Signal. 2011;4(170):er2
pubmed: 21674991
Stat Med. 1998 May 30;17(10):1103-20
pubmed: 9618772
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Feb 15;18(4):1120-8
pubmed: 22223528
Nature. 2013 Feb 14;494(7436):251-5
pubmed: 23302800
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(3):249-56
pubmed: 23414587
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Apr 20;31(12):1592-605
pubmed: 23509311
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Dec 15;21(24):5499-5510
pubmed: 26272063
Drugs. 2012 Jun 19;72 Suppl 1:28-36
pubmed: 22712795
Diagn Mol Pathol. 2010 Sep;19(3):157-63
pubmed: 20736745
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Feb 15;21(4):739-48
pubmed: 25516890
Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Sep;17(9):5598-611
pubmed: 9271435
Mol Cancer Ther. 2012 Feb;11(2):317-28
pubmed: 22188813
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 Jun;71(6):1395-409
pubmed: 23443307
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 1;33(34):4099-105
pubmed: 26324360
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Apr 15;18(8):2316-25
pubmed: 22261800
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Feb;14(2):134-40
pubmed: 23261356
Semin Oncol. 2003 Oct;30(5 Suppl 16):105-16
pubmed: 14613031
Cancer Res. 2012 Jan 1;72(1):210-9
pubmed: 22084396
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 20;373(8):726-36
pubmed: 26287849
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jan 20;30(3):282-90
pubmed: 22162589
Nature. 2016 Jun 30;534(7609):647-51
pubmed: 27338794
Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2015 Aug;23:98-107
pubmed: 26117819
Biomark Cancer. 2015 Sep 06;7(Suppl 1):9-12
pubmed: 26396549
BMC Cancer. 2009 Apr 09;9:111
pubmed: 19358724
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Feb 15;21(4):730-8
pubmed: 25500057
Invest New Drugs. 2014 Aug;32(4):670-81
pubmed: 24652201
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Jul 15;15(14):4649-64
pubmed: 19567590
Nature. 2010 Sep 30;467(7315):596-9
pubmed: 20823850
Nat Med. 2008 Dec;14(12):1351-6
pubmed: 19029981
Br J Cancer. 2012 Apr 10;106(8):1386-94
pubmed: 22415236
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct 7;18(37):5171-80
pubmed: 23066310