A Multidimensional Electronic Hydroxyurea Adherence Intervention for Children With Sickle Cell Disease: Single-Arm Before-After Study.
adherence
children
hydroxyurea
mhealth
mobile health
sickle cell disease
textmessaging
Journal
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
ISSN: 2291-5222
Titre abrégé: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101624439
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 08 2019
08 08 2019
Historique:
received:
21
01
2019
accepted:
23
04
2019
revised:
19
04
2019
entrez:
10
8
2019
pubmed:
10
8
2019
medline:
25
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hydroxyurea is a disease-modifying medication for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Despite demonstrated efficacy, hydroxyurea nonadherence in clinical practice is common and results in worse health outcomes for nonadherent patients. Mobile Directly Observed Therapy (Mobile DOT) is a pilot-tested, electronic, multidimensional hydroxyurea adherence intervention for children with SCD. Mobile DOT includes sending daily text message reminders to patients to take hydroxyurea, patients recording and sending daily videos that capture their hydroxyurea administrations for the research team to review and track adherence, providing personalized feedback to patients about their adherence, and providing small monetary incentives to patients if they achieve high hydroxyurea adherence. This study aimed to determine if Mobile DOT increases hydroxyurea adherence in children with SCD and to explore its impact on hematologic and clinical outcomes. This was a single-arm, 6-month intervention study of patients with SCD on hydroxyurea who were aged ≤19 years and reported having access to an electronic device. Participants' hydroxyurea adherence when they received Mobile DOT was compared with their adherence 6 months before and after receiving Mobile DOT. Participants' medication possession ratio (MPR) was calculated from their pharmacy dispensing records and was used to measure adherence. Laboratory and clinical outcomes were abstracted from participants' electronic medical records. Infrequently hospitalized patients who received at least 160 days of the intervention were considered to be engaged participants. Of 91 patients who were approached, 55 enrolled and 34 engaged with Mobile DOT. The median age of the engaged participants was 10 years (range 2-18.8 years), and 21 (62%, 21/34) participants were male, 28 (82%, 21/34) had hemoglobin SS SCD, and 19 (56%, 19/34) were prescribed hydroxyurea for at least a year before enrollment. With Mobile DOT, engaged participants' median MPR increased from 61.7% to 84.4% (P<.001) and significantly more (67% vs 30%; P=.002) achieved ≥80% hydroxyurea adherence compared with baseline values. Engaged participants' mean fetal hemoglobin (HgbF) levels and mean corpuscular volumes (MCV) improved significantly after 6 months of Mobile DOT (P=.04 and P=.001, respectively), but their adherence, HgbF levels, and MCV returned to baseline values during the 6 months after the intervention. Hospitalizations and the clinical outcomes that were measured occurred infrequently during the study. Nonengagement was associated with being female and having a recent SCD complication. In addition, having insufficient electronic data, being unable to quickly complete Mobile DOT each day, and not perceiving that Mobile DOT was beneficial may have further decreased engagement. Mobile DOT shows promise as an effective intervention for some children with SCD. Modifications that may improve recruitment, reduce attrition, and increase engagement were identified and could increase the impact that Mobile DOT has on children with SCD. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02578017; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02578017.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Hydroxyurea is a disease-modifying medication for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Despite demonstrated efficacy, hydroxyurea nonadherence in clinical practice is common and results in worse health outcomes for nonadherent patients. Mobile Directly Observed Therapy (Mobile DOT) is a pilot-tested, electronic, multidimensional hydroxyurea adherence intervention for children with SCD. Mobile DOT includes sending daily text message reminders to patients to take hydroxyurea, patients recording and sending daily videos that capture their hydroxyurea administrations for the research team to review and track adherence, providing personalized feedback to patients about their adherence, and providing small monetary incentives to patients if they achieve high hydroxyurea adherence.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to determine if Mobile DOT increases hydroxyurea adherence in children with SCD and to explore its impact on hematologic and clinical outcomes.
METHODS
This was a single-arm, 6-month intervention study of patients with SCD on hydroxyurea who were aged ≤19 years and reported having access to an electronic device. Participants' hydroxyurea adherence when they received Mobile DOT was compared with their adherence 6 months before and after receiving Mobile DOT. Participants' medication possession ratio (MPR) was calculated from their pharmacy dispensing records and was used to measure adherence. Laboratory and clinical outcomes were abstracted from participants' electronic medical records. Infrequently hospitalized patients who received at least 160 days of the intervention were considered to be engaged participants.
RESULTS
Of 91 patients who were approached, 55 enrolled and 34 engaged with Mobile DOT. The median age of the engaged participants was 10 years (range 2-18.8 years), and 21 (62%, 21/34) participants were male, 28 (82%, 21/34) had hemoglobin SS SCD, and 19 (56%, 19/34) were prescribed hydroxyurea for at least a year before enrollment. With Mobile DOT, engaged participants' median MPR increased from 61.7% to 84.4% (P<.001) and significantly more (67% vs 30%; P=.002) achieved ≥80% hydroxyurea adherence compared with baseline values. Engaged participants' mean fetal hemoglobin (HgbF) levels and mean corpuscular volumes (MCV) improved significantly after 6 months of Mobile DOT (P=.04 and P=.001, respectively), but their adherence, HgbF levels, and MCV returned to baseline values during the 6 months after the intervention. Hospitalizations and the clinical outcomes that were measured occurred infrequently during the study. Nonengagement was associated with being female and having a recent SCD complication. In addition, having insufficient electronic data, being unable to quickly complete Mobile DOT each day, and not perceiving that Mobile DOT was beneficial may have further decreased engagement.
CONCLUSIONS
Mobile DOT shows promise as an effective intervention for some children with SCD. Modifications that may improve recruitment, reduce attrition, and increase engagement were identified and could increase the impact that Mobile DOT has on children with SCD.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02578017; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02578017.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31397291
pii: v7i8e13452
doi: 10.2196/13452
pmc: PMC6705009
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antisickling Agents
0
Hydroxyurea
X6Q56QN5QC
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02578017']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e13452Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K23 HL127303
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
©Susan Creary, Deena Chisolm, Joseph Stanek, Jane Hankins, Sarah H O'Brien. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 08.08.2019.
Références
Blood. 2002 Jan 1;99(1):10-4
pubmed: 11756146
J Clin Invest. 2003 Jan;111(2):231-9
pubmed: 12531879
Blood. 2004 Mar 15;103(6):2039-45
pubmed: 14630791
N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 4;353(5):487-97
pubmed: 16079372
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006 Aug;15(8):565-74; discussion 575-7
pubmed: 16514590
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010 Feb;54(2):260-4
pubmed: 19856395
J Pediatr. 2010 Mar;156(3):415-9
pubmed: 19880135
Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Jan;64(2):169-81
pubmed: 20089007
Am J Hematol. 2011 Mar;86(3):273-7
pubmed: 21328441
Pain Med. 2011 May;12(5):697-705
pubmed: 21481164
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011 May;33(4):251-4
pubmed: 21516020
Lancet. 2011 May 14;377(9778):1663-72
pubmed: 21571150
J Pediatr. 2011 Oct;159(4):528-34
pubmed: 21722917
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Nov;53(9):936-43
pubmed: 21890753
Clin Chim Acta. 2012 Aug 16;413(15-16):1232-8
pubmed: 22515960
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2012 Dec;9(4):287-312
pubmed: 22936463
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013 Aug;60(8):1333-7
pubmed: 23418000
J Pediatr Psychol. 2013 Jul;38(6):629-37
pubmed: 23699750
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Jul;32(7):1244-50
pubmed: 23836740
Pediatrics. 2013 Oct;132(4):677-83
pubmed: 23999955
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Jun;61(6):1068-73
pubmed: 24436121
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Nov;61(11):2031-6
pubmed: 25132074
JAMA. 2014 Sep 10;312(10):1033-48
pubmed: 25203083
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015 Feb;62(2):184-185
pubmed: 25308571
Int J Lab Hematol. 2016 Feb;38(1):54-63
pubmed: 26407903
Am J Hematol. 2016 Feb;91(2):238-42
pubmed: 26615793
Lancet. 2016 Feb 13;387(10019):661-70
pubmed: 26670617
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 23;17(12):e287
pubmed: 26701961
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Mar;176(3):340-9
pubmed: 26831740
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016 May;63(5):848-52
pubmed: 26844685
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Oct 03;5(4):e193
pubmed: 27697749
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Oct 25;4(4):e121
pubmed: 27780795
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 Jun;64(6):
pubmed: 27896936
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0170581
pubmed: 28152012
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 May 15;5(5):e66
pubmed: 28506955
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 Dec;64(12):null
pubmed: 28643377
Am J Hematol. 2017 Dec;92(12):1333-1339
pubmed: 28913922
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2017 May-Jun;2(3):
pubmed: 29399659
Br J Haematol. 2018 Jul;182(2):259-270
pubmed: 29767446
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 19;20(7):e10940
pubmed: 30026178
Internet Interv. 2016 Nov 02;6:89-106
pubmed: 30135818
N Engl J Med. 1995 May 18;332(20):1317-22
pubmed: 7715639
N Engl J Med. 1994 Jun 9;330(23):1639-44
pubmed: 7993409
N Engl J Med. 1993 Feb 25;328(8):576-8
pubmed: 8426627