Effects of Enriched Charcoal as Permanent 0.2% Feed-Additive in Standard and Low-Protein Diets of Male Fattening Turkeys: An On-Farm Study.
charcoal
compensatory growth
crude protein reduced diet
footpad dermatitis
turkey
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Aug 2019
08 Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
08
07
2019
revised:
31
07
2019
accepted:
04
08
2019
entrez:
11
8
2019
pubmed:
11
8
2019
medline:
11
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Wet litter is the most important cause of footpad dermatitis in poultry, this in turn being a highly relevant animal-related welfare indicator. This field study was subdivided into two experiments. In Experiment 1, the standard diet was supplemented by 0.2% enriched charcoal, being a non-specific absorber and therefore might be promising in reducing faecal moisture. In Experiment 2, the experimental group received a reduced crude protein diet during weeks 6-13, combined with a 0.2% enriched charcoal supplementation. The trials were each conducted with two batches on three farms under on-farm conditions. The animals were observed at 6, 10, 14 and 18 weeks of age to collect data on body weight and different health parameters. The mortality and litter samples were analysed after slaughtering. In Experiment 1, performance and health were not affected despite higher dry matter content of the litter. In Experiment 2, the weight of birds receiving the protein-reduced diet was decreased significantly throughout the experiment. However, the slaughter weight did not differ. The mortality was reduced by 0.5% in the experimental group. Therefore, it was concluded that 0.2% of enriched charcoal is not a valuable feed-additive regarding animal health, while temporary protein reduction might have positive effects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31398925
pii: ani9080541
doi: 10.3390/ani9080541
pmc: PMC6721224
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : EIP Agri Europäische Innovationspartnerschaft Produktivität und Nachhaltigkeit in der Landwirtschaft
ID : 276034030000069
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Références
Poult Sci. 1980 Apr;59(4):748-7
pubmed: 7375422
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 Apr;61(4):947-52
pubmed: 18227086
Vet Parasitol. 2011 Aug 25;180(3-4):354-7
pubmed: 21497020
Br Poult Sci. 1998 Dec;39 Suppl:S31-2
pubmed: 10188032
Int J Cancer. 2018 Jul 1;143(1):73-79
pubmed: 29435982
Br Poult Sci. 1971 Jan;12(1):137-50
pubmed: 5569573
J Biomater Appl. 1998 Oct;13(2):128-57
pubmed: 9777464
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1960 Aug;35:324-63
pubmed: 13785698
Anim Sci J. 2013 Feb;84(2):113-20
pubmed: 23384352
Avian Pathol. 1985 Jul;14(3):353-64
pubmed: 18766928
Anat Histol Embryol. 2004 Feb;33(1):11-6
pubmed: 15027956
BMJ. 1993 Jan 9;306(6870):78-9
pubmed: 8435642
Br Poult Sci. 2009 Jan;50(1):123-30
pubmed: 19234936
Vet Rec. 2001 Feb 17;148(7):195-7
pubmed: 11265995
Arch Anim Nutr. 2011 Apr;65(2):148-62
pubmed: 21545080
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2011 Jan;43(1):51-6
pubmed: 20652406
J Vet Med Sci. 2001 Mar;63(3):281-5
pubmed: 11307928
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Apr;91(4):1458-63
pubmed: 18349239
Prev Vet Med. 2012 Aug 1;105(4):320-5
pubmed: 22459488
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 26;11(4):e0154061
pubmed: 27116607
J Vet Med Sci. 2014 Apr;76(4):583-6
pubmed: 24366153
Poult Sci. 1997 Oct;76(10):1392-7
pubmed: 9316115
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2009 Jul-Aug;122(7-8):257-63
pubmed: 19681398
Poult Sci. 1988 Jul;67(7):1102-4
pubmed: 3222198
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2015 Sep-Oct;25(5):606-10
pubmed: 25891141
Poult Sci. 1977 Jan;56(1):291-6
pubmed: 605009
Clin Toxicol. 1970 Mar;3(1):1-4
pubmed: 5520389
Poult Sci. 2005 Apr;84(4):515-21
pubmed: 15844805
Avian Dis. 2011 Mar;55(1):51-8
pubmed: 21500636