Radiotherapy of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices according to the DEGRO/DGK guideline-is the risk of relevant errors overestimated?
Radiotherapie von Patienten mit kardialen implantierbaren elektronischen Geräten entsprechend der DEGRO/DGK-Leitlinie – wird das Risiko für relevante Fehlfunktionen überschätzt?
Cohort Studies
Contraindications, Procedure
Correlation of Data
Defibrillators, Implantable
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
Equipment Failure Analysis
/ statistics & numerical data
Guideline Adherence
Head and Neck Neoplasms
/ radiotherapy
Humans
Incidence
Lung Neoplasms
/ radiotherapy
Neutron Activation Analysis
Pacemaker, Artificial
Radiotherapy
/ adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
/ statistics & numerical data
Statistics as Topic
CIED
ICD
Irradiation
Pacemaker
Radiation
Journal
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]
ISSN: 1439-099X
Titre abrégé: Strahlenther Onkol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8603469
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
08
03
2019
accepted:
19
07
2019
pubmed:
11
8
2019
medline:
20
3
2020
entrez:
11
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ionizing radiation is able to cause severe damage to cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). In Germany, the DEGRO/DGK guideline recommends close monitoring of patients with CIEDs undergoing radiotherapy (RT). Nevertheless, especially in the era of intensity-modulated techniques and predominant use of 6 MV photons, errors of CIEDs are rare events. Therefore, we performed daily CIED controls and hypothesized that no relevant device interaction would occur in our cohort. From 2014 to 2018, we collected data of 51 patients (62 courses) with daily interrogation (n = 1046) of CIED. The dose to the skin above the CIED was measured by semiconductor or ion chamber dosimetry at least once per RT course. In many cases the dose was also calculated. The prescribed dose to the planning target volume (PTV) ranged from 7.5 to 78.0 Gy (IQR 27.8-61.0 Gy). The median measured cumulative dose to the skin above the CIED was 0.17 Gy, whereas the median calculated dose was 1.03 Gy. No error occurred in the group with maximum beam energy >10 MeV. Three events without clinical relevance could be recognized in the group with an intensity-modulated technique at 6 MV. None of the three concerned devices were located directly within the PTV. Errors of CIEDs during RT are rare events. The approach according to the DEGRO/DGK guideline is safe, but also consumes resources. In our cohort it was not compulsory to relocate any CIED. Clinically relevant events are uncommon, so it remains debatable which procedure is necessary. Daily controls could be avoided in some selected cases without compromising patient safety.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31399799
doi: 10.1007/s00066-019-01502-0
pii: 10.1007/s00066-019-01502-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1086-1093Références
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1984 Oct;10(10):1967-9
pubmed: 6436202
Case Rep Oncol Med. 2014;2014:989857
pubmed: 25276450
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1978 Nov-Dec;4(11-12):1055-8
pubmed: 102622
Strahlenther Onkol. 2015 May;191(5):393-404
pubmed: 25739476
Strahlentherapie. 1977 Jul;153(7):456-61
pubmed: 898209
Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 Aug;194(8):750-758
pubmed: 29761228
Europace. 2016 Feb;18(2):288-93
pubmed: 26333380
Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 May;194(5):435-443
pubmed: 29349603
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Aug;1(5):624-32
pubmed: 26181143
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Oct;12(10):2148-54
pubmed: 26049049
Radiat Oncol. 2012 Nov 24;7:198
pubmed: 23176563
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Sep 1;63(1):282-9
pubmed: 16111598
Br J Anaesth. 2012 May;108(5):881-2; author reply 882
pubmed: 22499754
Europace. 2013 Jan;15(1):60-5
pubmed: 22848077
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jul 1;59(3):897-904
pubmed: 15183493
Strahlenther Onkol. 2017 Sep;193(9):756-760
pubmed: 28567504
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 14;377(24):2325-2336
pubmed: 29236642
Heart Rhythm. 2012 Dec;9(12):1964-8
pubmed: 23102626
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994 Mar;17(3 Pt 1):270-3
pubmed: 7513850
Europace. 2014 Apr;16(4):612-6
pubmed: 23933852
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul - Aug;9(4):266-273
pubmed: 30922971
Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 Jul;194(7):638-645
pubmed: 29511777
Strahlenther Onkol. 2016 Apr;192(4):199-208
pubmed: 26931319
Phys Med Biol. 2002 Aug 21;47(16):2879-93
pubmed: 12222852
Europace. 2012 Nov;14(11):1595
pubmed: 22581624
J Radiat Res. 2011;52(4):516-21
pubmed: 21905310
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Mar;38(3):343-56
pubmed: 25601489
Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 May;194(5):375-385
pubmed: 29302704
Strahlenther Onkol. 1995 Jul;171(7):398-402
pubmed: 7631261
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Mar 15;255:175-183
pubmed: 29310933
Med Dosim. 2014 Winter;39(4):320-4
pubmed: 25087083
Circulation. 2019 Jan 15;139(3):313-321
pubmed: 30586734
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Mar 1;85(3):840-5
pubmed: 22818414