Satisfaction, disappointment and regret surrounding fertility preservation decisions in the paediatric and adolescent cancer population.
Decision regret
Decision-making
Fertility preservation
Oncofertility
Paediatric
Journal
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
ISSN: 1573-7330
Titre abrégé: J Assist Reprod Genet
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9206495
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
16
01
2019
accepted:
16
07
2019
pubmed:
11
8
2019
medline:
6
2
2020
entrez:
11
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
With over 80% of paediatric and adolescent cancer patients surviving into adulthood, quality-of-life issues such as future fertility are increasingly important. However, little is known about regret around decisions to pursue or forgo fertility preservation (FP). We investigated the risk of decision regret in families involved in making a FP decision and explored contributive factors. Parents and patients ≥ 15 years were invited to participate. Participants completed a 10-item survey, including a validated Decision Regret Scale. Scores ≥ 30 indicated high regret. Free-text response items allowed participants to provide reasons for satisfaction or regret. A total of 108 parents and 30 patients participated. Most (81.4%) reported low regret (mean score 13.7). On multivariate analysis, predictors of low regret included having a FP procedure and a fertility discussion pre-treatment. Most participants believed that FP offers hope for future fertility. Some reported dissatisfaction with the process of decision-making. Overall levels of regret in the study population were low, with factors associated with quality, timely discussion and belief in the success of FP technology being predictors of low regret. However, dissatisfaction with the decision-making process itself revealed that refinements to the programme are required to meet families' needs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31399917
doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01536-4
pii: 10.1007/s10815-019-01536-4
pmc: PMC6730729
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1805-1822Subventions
Organisme : Victorian Cancer Agency
ID : ECSG13027
Organisme : National Breast Cancer Foundation
ID : ECF-0015
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Apr 1;20(7):1890-7
pubmed: 11919249
Med Decis Making. 2003 Jul-Aug;23(4):281-92
pubmed: 12926578
Health Serv Res. 2005 Jun;40(3):745-67
pubmed: 15960689
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Sep;72(3):402-10
pubmed: 18621502
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009 Aug;53(2):281-4
pubmed: 19301387
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Jul;116(2):215-23
pubmed: 19390962
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011 Apr;64(4):494-9
pubmed: 20637714
J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 1;29(13):1670-7
pubmed: 21444865
Cancer. 2012 Mar 15;118(6):1710-7
pubmed: 21887678
J Adolesc Health. 2011 Oct;49(4):337-46
pubmed: 21939862
Br J Cancer. 2012 Mar 13;106(6):1053-61
pubmed: 22415294
Br J Cancer. 2013 Apr 30;108(8):1602-15
pubmed: 23579214
Cancer. 2013 Nov 15;119(22):4044-50
pubmed: 24037854
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Nov;132(5):724e-734e
pubmed: 24165624
J Urol. 2014 May;191(5 Suppl):1558-63
pubmed: 24679868
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Sep;61(9):1673-8
pubmed: 24777742
Hum Reprod. 2014 Aug;29(8):1721-9
pubmed: 24916435
Hum Reprod. 2015 Jul;30(7):1625-34
pubmed: 26034191
Hum Reprod. 2015 Sep;30(9):2022-30
pubmed: 26141713
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2015 Dec;4(4):213-8
pubmed: 26697271
Med Decis Making. 2016 Aug;36(6):777-90
pubmed: 26975351
Laryngoscope. 2016 Jul;126 Suppl 5:S5-S13
pubmed: 27233057
J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Feb;11(1):58-63
pubmed: 27480882
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2017 Jun;6(2):213-222
pubmed: 27906588
Hum Reprod. 2017 May 1;32(5):1046-1054
pubmed: 28333228
J Med Ethics. 2018 Jan;44(1):27-31
pubmed: 29084865
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2018 Apr;40(3):e133-e139
pubmed: 29481385
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;36(19):1994-2001
pubmed: 29620997
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2018 Aug;7(4):509-513
pubmed: 29733237
Health Educ Q. 1984 Spring;11(1):1-47
pubmed: 6392204
Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):25-30
pubmed: 7898294