Computed tomography angiography is not accurate in predicting surgical prosthetic aortic valve implant size.


Journal

Surgery
ISSN: 1532-7361
Titre abrégé: Surgery
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0417347

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2020
Historique:
received: 01 02 2019
revised: 02 06 2019
accepted: 25 06 2019
pubmed: 12 8 2019
medline: 10 5 2020
entrez: 12 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Multidetector computed tomography is vital in preoperative sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. The purpose of this study is to determine whether preoperative transcatheter aortic valve replacement multidetector computed tomography accurately predicts surgical aortic valve prosthesis size. Between July 2012 and July 2017, 102 patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement had preoperative aortic valve sizing by multidetector computed tomography. The aortic annulus diameter calculated using multidetector computed tomography was compared with intraoperative valve sizing during surgical aortic valve replacement. Forty-one (40.2%) of the 102 patients studied had multidetector computed tomography aortic valve measurements that were accurate. Implanted valves were smaller than multidetector computed tomography calculation in 40 patients (39.2%) and were larger in 21 patients (20.6%). Multidetector computed tomography measurements remained inconsistent with intraoperative sizing regardless of aortic annulus diameter. The variance between multidetector computed tomography annulus measurements and intraoperative sizing was statistically significant. Preoperative aortic annulus measurements by our institutional transcatheter aortic valve replacement multidetector computed tomography protocol differed substantially from surgical implant size. There was no trend toward over nor under sizing for the entire cohort. However, patients with large measured annulus diameter were more likely to have a smaller valve implanted than predicted, and patients with small measured annulus diameter were more likely to have a larger valve implanted than predicted. These results may affect preoperative planning for patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Multidetector computed tomography is vital in preoperative sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. The purpose of this study is to determine whether preoperative transcatheter aortic valve replacement multidetector computed tomography accurately predicts surgical aortic valve prosthesis size.
METHODS
Between July 2012 and July 2017, 102 patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement had preoperative aortic valve sizing by multidetector computed tomography. The aortic annulus diameter calculated using multidetector computed tomography was compared with intraoperative valve sizing during surgical aortic valve replacement.
RESULTS
Forty-one (40.2%) of the 102 patients studied had multidetector computed tomography aortic valve measurements that were accurate. Implanted valves were smaller than multidetector computed tomography calculation in 40 patients (39.2%) and were larger in 21 patients (20.6%). Multidetector computed tomography measurements remained inconsistent with intraoperative sizing regardless of aortic annulus diameter. The variance between multidetector computed tomography annulus measurements and intraoperative sizing was statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS
Preoperative aortic annulus measurements by our institutional transcatheter aortic valve replacement multidetector computed tomography protocol differed substantially from surgical implant size. There was no trend toward over nor under sizing for the entire cohort. However, patients with large measured annulus diameter were more likely to have a smaller valve implanted than predicted, and patients with small measured annulus diameter were more likely to have a larger valve implanted than predicted. These results may affect preoperative planning for patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31400952
pii: S0039-6060(19)30410-6
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.06.022
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

499-503

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Robert Boova (R)

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine-Temple University, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: robert.boova@tuhs.temple.edu.

Sourodeep Banerjee (S)

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine-Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

Abul Kashem (A)

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine-Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

Aditya Das (A)

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine-Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

Hannah Zimmerman (H)

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine-Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

Rachel Jennings (R)

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine-Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

Kenji Minakata (K)

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine-Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

Yoshiya Toyoda (Y)

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine-Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH