Single or double needle insertion in twin's amniocentesis: Does the technique influence the risk of complications?
Abortion
Amniocentesis
Needle insertion
Twin pregnancy
Journal
European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X
ISSN: 2590-1613
Titre abrégé: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101750520
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
13
01
2019
revised:
30
04
2019
accepted:
14
05
2019
entrez:
13
8
2019
pubmed:
14
8
2019
medline:
14
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To compare complication rates following amniocentesis in twin gestations, according to sampling technique and number of needle insertions. A retrospective cohort study of all women with twin gestations who underwent amniocentesis and delivered in a single university affiliated medical center during 2002-2016. Amniocentesis was performed either through one uterine entry with passage through the inter-twin membrane or through two different entries to the two amniotic sacs. Pregnancy outcome of women that underwent single needle insertion amniocentesis, was compared to this of double needle insertion. Primary outcome was neonatal complications within 4 weeks after amniocentesis (late abortion, chorioamnionitis, preterm premature rupture of membranes, or hospitalization due to related symptoms). Secondary outcomes were gestational week at delivery and labor characteristics. The study group comprised 212 women. Of them, 73 (34.4%) underwent a single uterine insertion and 139 (65.6%) two separate needle insertions. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups. The amniocentesis complication rate was 13.7% in the single insertion group and 16.5% in the double insertion group (p = 0.587). Multivariate analysis found that a single insertion method had no statistically significant influence on complication rate, after making adjustments for potential confounders (OR = 1.085, 95% CI 0.4-2.9; p = 0.871). Other labor characteristics were similar between the groups. Needle insertion technique in twin gestation amniocentesis was not associated with procedure related complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31403133
doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100051
pii: S2590-1613(19)30086-9
pii: 100051
pmc: PMC6687441
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100051Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD003252
pubmed: 12917956
Prenat Diagn. 2005 Sep;25(9):751-8
pubmed: 16170858
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;202(4):365.e1-5
pubmed: 20060095
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006 Jun;28(6):512-8
pubmed: 16857119
Lancet. 1986 Jun 7;1(8493):1287-93
pubmed: 2423826
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;108(5):1067-72
pubmed: 17077226
Prenat Diagn. 2012 May;32(5):409-16
pubmed: 22028248
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jan;101(1):129-35
pubmed: 12517657
Fetal Diagn Ther. 1995 May-Jun;10(3):178-81
pubmed: 7639939
Prenat Diagn. 1995 Jan;15(1):17-9
pubmed: 7739992
Prenat Diagn. 2007 Feb;27(2):180-3
pubmed: 17238217
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;40(2):128-34
pubmed: 22125091
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Apr;12(2):87-92
pubmed: 10813569
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Aug;39(3):281-5
pubmed: 10554934
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998 Jun;61(3):285-7
pubmed: 9688491
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;110(3):687-94
pubmed: 17766619