Evaluation of novel disposable bioreactors on pandemic influenza virus production.
Animals
Bioreactors
Chlorocebus aethiops
Disposable Equipment
Dogs
Humans
Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype
/ growth & development
Influenza A Virus, H7N9 Subtype
/ growth & development
Influenza Vaccines
/ biosynthesis
Influenza, Human
/ epidemiology
Madin Darby Canine Kidney Cells
/ virology
Pandemics
Vero Cells
/ virology
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
20
02
2019
accepted:
23
07
2019
entrez:
13
8
2019
pubmed:
14
8
2019
medline:
10
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Since 1997, the highly pathogenic influenza H5N1 virus has spread from Hong Kong. According to the WHO bulletin report, the H5N1 virus is a zoonotic disease threat that has infected more than 850 humans, causing over 450 deaths. In addition, an outbreak of another new and highly pathogenic influenza virus (H7N9) occurred in 2013 in China. These highly pathogenic influenza viruses could potentially cause a worldwide pandemic. it is crucial to develop a rapid production platform to meet this surge demand against any possible influenza pandemic. A potential solution for this problem is the use of cell-based bioreactors for rapid vaccine production. These novel bioreactors, used for cell-based vaccine production, possess various advantages. For example, they enable a short production time, allow for the handling highly pathogenic influenza in closed environments, and can be easily scaled up. In this study, two novel disposable cell-based bioreactors, BelloCell and TideCell, were used to produce H5N1 clade II and H7N9 candidate vaccine viruses (CVVs). Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells were used for the production of these influenza CVVs. A novel bench-scale bioreactor named BelloCell bioreactor was used in the study. All culturing conditions were tested and scaled to 10 L industrial-scale bioreactor known as TideCell002. The performances of between BelloCell and TideCell were similar in cell growth, the average MDCK cell doubling time was slightly decreased to 25 hours. The systems yielded approximately 39.2 and 18.0 μg/ml of HA protein with the 10-liter TideCell002 from the H5N1 clade II and H7N9 CVVs, respectively. The results of this study not only highlight the overall effectiveness of these bioreactors but also illustrate the potential of maintaining the same outcome when scaled up to industrial production, which has many implications for faster vaccine production. Although additional studies are required for process optimization, the results of this study are promising and show that oscillating bioreactors may be a suitable platform for pandemic influenza virus production.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31404117
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220803
pii: PONE-D-19-01177
pmc: PMC6690526
doi:
Substances chimiques
Influenza Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0220803Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Gene Med. 2004 Feb;6 Suppl 1:S184-92
pubmed: 14978761
J Biotechnol. 2005 Aug 4;118(2):135-47
pubmed: 15951042
Biotechnol Lett. 2005 Aug;27(15):1059-65
pubmed: 16132854
Biologicals. 2007 Oct;35(4):221-6
pubmed: 17400474
Hum Gene Ther. 2007 Nov;18(11):1161-70
pubmed: 17944574
J Virol. 2008 Feb;82(4):1798-807
pubmed: 18077726
Cytotechnology. 2003 Sep;42(3):145-53
pubmed: 19002936
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009 Feb 1;102(2):348-56
pubmed: 19090536
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009 Nov;85(1):53-63
pubmed: 19521697
Vaccine. 2009 Oct 30;27(46):6420-3
pubmed: 19559120
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010 Sep;88(2):461-75
pubmed: 20617311
PLoS One. 2011 Jan 24;6(1):e14578
pubmed: 21283675
Biotechnol Prog. 2011 Jan-Feb;27(1):241-50
pubmed: 21312371
BMC Biotechnol. 2011 Aug 11;11:81
pubmed: 21835017
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2011 Aug;10(8):1183-94
pubmed: 21854311
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e24057
pubmed: 22022351
Trends Microbiol. 2012 Mar;20(3):103-5
pubmed: 22257962
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013 Jan;97(1):111-22
pubmed: 22821436
Trends Biotechnol. 2013 Mar;31(3):147-54
pubmed: 23178074
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59892
pubmed: 23555825
Vaccine. 2014 Feb 12;32(8):1003-11
pubmed: 24269322
Vaccine. 2014 May 19;32(24):2770-81
pubmed: 24583003
Nat Protoc. 2014 Nov;9(11):2663-81
pubmed: 25321410
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Feb 5;370(1661):20140040
pubmed: 25533097
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:504831
pubmed: 25815321
Virus Res. 2015 Jun 2;204:40-6
pubmed: 25892718
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2015 Jun;14(6):789-804
pubmed: 25968069
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2012 Sep;1(9):e25
pubmed: 26038430
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 05;10(11):e0141686
pubmed: 26540170