Using national electronic health care registries for comparing the risk of psychiatric re-hospitalisation in six European countries: Opportunities and limitations.


Journal

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
ISSN: 1872-6054
Titre abrégé: Health Policy
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8409431

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2019
Historique:
received: 17 08 2018
revised: 19 05 2019
accepted: 09 07 2019
pubmed: 14 8 2019
medline: 17 9 2020
entrez: 14 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Psychiatric re-hospitalisation rates have been of longstanding interest as health care quality metric for planners and policy makers, but are criticized for not being comparable across hospitals and countries due to measurement unclarities. The objectives of the present study were to explore the interoperability of national electronic routine health care registries of six European countries (Austria, Finland, Italy, Norway, Romania, Slovenia) and, by using variables found to be comparable, to calculate and compare re-hospitalisation rates and the associated risk factors. A "Methods Toolkit" was developed for exploring the interoperability of registry data and protocol led pilot studies were carried out. Problems encountered in this process are described. Using restricted but comparable data sets, up to twofold differences in psychiatric re-hospitalisation rates were found between countries for both a 30- and 365-day follow-up period. Cumulative incidence curves revealed noteworthy additional differences. Health system characteristics are discussed as potential causes for the differences. Multi-level logistic regression analyses showed that younger age and a diagnosis of schizophrenia/mania/bipolar disorder consistently increased the probability of psychiatric re-hospitalisation across countries. It is concluded that the advantage of having large unselected study populations of national electronic health care registries needs to be balanced against the considerable efforts to examine the interoperability of databases in cross-country comparisons.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31405616
pii: S0168-8510(18)30370-1
doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.07.006
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Pagination

1028-1035

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Heinz Katschnig (H)

IMEHPS.research, Vienna, Austria; Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: heinz.katschnig@meduniwien.ac.at.

Christa Straßmayr (C)

IMEHPS.research, Vienna, Austria.

Florian Endel (F)

IMEHPS.research, Vienna, Austria.

Michael Berger (M)

IMEHPS.research, Vienna, Austria.

Günther Zauner (G)

dwh Simulation Services, Vienna, Austria.

Jorid Kalseth (J)

SINTEF Digital, Health Research, Trondheim, Norway.

Raluca Sfetcu (R)

National School of Public Health, Management and Professional Development (SNSPMPDS), Bucharest, Romania.

Kristian Wahlbeck (K)

National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Mental Health Unit, Helsinki, Finland.

Federico Tedeschi (F)

Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Lilijana Šprah (L)

Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts (ZRC SAZU), Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH