Competing national memories of World War II.

collective memory ethnocentrism national memory national narcissism public event memory

Journal

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 08 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 14 8 2019
medline: 26 3 2020
entrez: 14 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We assessed the knowledge of 1,338 people from 11 countries (8 former Allied and 3 former Axis) about World War II. When asked what percentage their country contributed to the war effort, across Allied countries, estimates totaled 309%, and Axis nations' estimates came to 140%. People in 4 nations claimed more than 50% responsibility for their country (Germany, Russia, United Kingdom, and United States). The overclaiming of responsibility reflected in these percentages was moderated when subjects were asked to consider the contributions of other countries; however, Russians continued to claim great responsibility, the only country that remained well over 50% in its claim of responsibility for the Allied victory. If deaths in the war are considered a proxy of a nation's contributions, the Soviet Union did carry much of the burden. This study points to sharp differences in national memory even across nations who fought on the same side in the war. Differing national perspectives shape diverse memories of the same complex event.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31405968
pii: 1907992116
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907992116
pmc: PMC6708356
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

16678-16686

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

Br J Soc Psychol. 2005 Dec;44(Pt 4):537-56
pubmed: 16368018
Mem Cognit. 2014 Apr;42(3):383-99
pubmed: 24097190
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Dec;97(6):1074-96
pubmed: 19968420
Memory. 2019 Sep;27(8):1099-1109
pubmed: 31145022
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 20;116(34):16678-16686
pubmed: 31405968
Memory. 2008 Apr;16(3):318-26
pubmed: 18324555
Psychol Sci. 2018 Sep;29(9):1414-1422
pubmed: 29911934
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 May;22(5):438-451
pubmed: 29678236
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1606-1618
pubmed: 28861751

Auteurs

Henry L Roediger (HL)

Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899; roediger@wustl.edu.

Magdalena Abel (M)

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, 93040 Regensburg, Germany.

Sharda Umanath (S)

Department of Psychological Science, Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, CA 91711.

Ruth A Shaffer (RA)

Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899.

Beth Fairfield (B)

Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti, 66100 Chieti Scalo, Chieti, Italy.

Masanobu Takahashi (M)

Department of Psychology, University of the Sacred Heart, Shibuya-ku, 150-8938 Tokyo, Japan.

James V Wertsch (JV)

Department of Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH