Autophosphorylation is sufficient to release Mps1 kinase from native kinetochores.
mitosis
single molecule fluorescence
spindle assembly checkpoint
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 08 2019
27 08 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
14
8
2019
medline:
31
3
2020
entrez:
14
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Accurate mitosis depends on a surveillance system called the spindle assembly checkpoint. This checkpoint acts at kinetochores, which attach chromosomes to the dynamic tips of spindle microtubules. When a kinetochore is unattached or improperly attached, the protein kinase Mps1 phosphorylates kinetochore components, catalyzing the generation of a diffusible "wait" signal that delays anaphase and gives the cell time to correct the error. When a kinetochore becomes properly attached, its checkpoint signal is silenced to allow progression into anaphase. Recently, microtubules were found to compete directly against recombinant human Mps1 fragments for binding to the major microtubule-binding kinetochore element Ndc80c, suggesting a direct competition model for silencing the checkpoint signal at properly attached kinetochores. Here, by developing single-particle fluorescence-based assays, we tested whether such direct competition occurs in the context of native kinetochores isolated from yeast. Mps1 levels were not reduced on kinetochore particles bound laterally to the sides of microtubules or on particles tracking processively with disassembling tips. Instead, we found that Mps1 kinase activity was sufficient to promote its release from the isolated kinetochores. Mps1 autophosphorylation, rather than phosphorylation of other kinetochore components, was responsible for this dissociation. Our findings suggest that checkpoint silencing in yeast does not arise from a direct competition between Mps1 and microtubules, and that phosphoregulation of Mps1 may be a critical aspect of the silencing mechanism.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31405987
pii: 1901653116
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1901653116
pmc: PMC6717314
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fungal Proteins
0
Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases
EC 2.7.11.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17355-17360Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : P01 GM105537
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA015704
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM079373
Pays : United States
Organisme : Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : T32 CA080416
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM007270
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM064386
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R35 GM134842
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Science. 2002 Sep 27;297(5590):2267-70
pubmed: 12351790
Mol Biol Cell. 2003 Apr;14(4):1638-51
pubmed: 12686615
Cell Res. 2003 Dec;13(6):443-9
pubmed: 14728800
Curr Biol. 2004 Jun 8;14(11):953-64
pubmed: 15182668
Chromosoma. 2004 Aug;113(1):1-15
pubmed: 15235793
Dev Cell. 2004 Nov;7(5):637-51
pubmed: 15525526
Nat Rev Cancer. 2005 Oct;5(10):773-85
pubmed: 16195750
Science. 2006 Aug 4;313(5787):680-4
pubmed: 16825537
Mol Biol Cell. 2009 Jan;20(1):10-20
pubmed: 18923149
EMBO J. 2009 Apr 22;28(8):1099-110
pubmed: 19300438
Nat Chem Biol. 2010 May;6(5):359-68
pubmed: 20383151
PLoS One. 2010 Apr 22;5(4):e10251
pubmed: 20422024
J Cell Biol. 2010 Jul 12;190(1):25-34
pubmed: 20624899
J Cell Biol. 2010 Jul 12;190(1):73-87
pubmed: 20624901
J Cell Biol. 2010 Oct 18;191(2):281-90
pubmed: 20937696
Nature. 2010 Nov 25;468(7323):576-9
pubmed: 21107429
Cancer Res. 2010 Dec 15;70(24):10255-64
pubmed: 21159646
Science. 2011 Mar 11;331(6022):1289-95
pubmed: 21393538
Curr Biol. 2012 Feb 21;22(4):289-95
pubmed: 22245000
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Jan 24;13(3):189-203
pubmed: 22269907
Annu Rev Biochem. 2012;81:561-85
pubmed: 22482908
Curr Biol. 2012 May 22;22(10):900-6
pubmed: 22521787
J Cell Biol. 2013 Apr 15;201(2):217-31
pubmed: 23569217
Genetics. 2013 Jul;194(3):785-9
pubmed: 23636741
Genes Dev. 2014 Jan 15;28(2):140-52
pubmed: 24402315
Science. 2014 Oct 10;346(6206):248-51
pubmed: 25213378
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 29;9(9):e104723
pubmed: 25265012
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014 Nov;15(11):736-47
pubmed: 25303117
Nat Cell Biol. 2015 Jul;17(7):868-79
pubmed: 26053220
Science. 2015 Jun 12;348(6240):1260-4
pubmed: 26068854
Science. 2015 Jun 12;348(6240):1264-7
pubmed: 26068855
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 18;112(33):E4546-55
pubmed: 26240331
Curr Biol. 2015 Oct 19;25(20):R1002-18
pubmed: 26485365
Cell. 2016 Jun 2;165(6):1428-1439
pubmed: 27156448
Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1486:437-467
pubmed: 27844439
Cell. 2016 Nov 3;167(4):1014-1027.e12
pubmed: 27881300
Dev Cell. 2017 Apr 24;41(2):143-156.e6
pubmed: 28441529
Elife. 2017 May 02;6:
pubmed: 28463114
J Cell Biol. 2017 Jun 5;216(6):1533-1542
pubmed: 28536121
Open Biol. 2018 Aug;8(8):
pubmed: 30111590
Cell Rep. 2019 Feb 19;26(8):2101-2112.e6
pubmed: 30784592
Nature. 1988 Feb 11;331(6156):499-504
pubmed: 3340202
Mol Biol Cell. 1995 Dec;6(12):1619-40
pubmed: 8590794
Science. 1996 Aug 16;273(5277):953-6
pubmed: 8688079