Environmental spatial and temporal variability and its role in non-favoured mutant dynamics.
Moran process
fixation
mutations
neutrality
randomness
rare mutant
Journal
Journal of the Royal Society, Interface
ISSN: 1742-5662
Titre abrégé: J R Soc Interface
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101217269
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 08 2019
30 08 2019
Historique:
entrez:
15
8
2019
pubmed:
15
8
2019
medline:
18
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Understanding how environmental variability (or randomness) affects evolution is of fundamental importance for biology. The presence of temporal or spatial variability significantly affects the competition dynamics in populations, and gives rise to some counterintuitive observations. In this paper, we consider both birth-death (BD) or death-birth (DB) Moran processes, which are set up on a circular or a complete graph. We investigate spatial and temporal variability affecting division and/or death parameters. Assuming that mutant and wild-type fitness parameters are drawn from an identical distribution, we study mutant fixation probability and timing. We demonstrate that temporal and spatial types of variability possess fundamentally different properties. Under temporal randomness, in a completely mixed system, minority mutants experience (i) higher than neutral fixation probability and a higher mean conditional fixation time, if the division rates are affected by randomness and (ii) lower fixation probability and lower mean conditional fixation time if the death rates are affected. Once spatial restrictions are imposed, however, these effects completely disappear, and mutants in a circular graph experience neutral dynamics, but only for the DB update rule in case (i) and for the BD rule in case (ii) above. In contrast to this, in the case of spatially variable environment, both for BD/DB processes, both for complete/circular graph and both for division/death rates affected, minority mutants experience a higher than neutral probability of fixation. Fixation time, however, is increased by randomness on a circle, while it decreases for complete graphs under random division rates. A basic difference between temporal and spatial kinds of variability is the types of correlations that occur in the system. Under temporal randomness, mutants are spatially correlated with each other (they simply have equal fitness values at a given moment of time; the same holds for wild-types). Under spatial randomness, there are subtler, temporal correlations among mutant and wild-type cells, which manifest themselves by cells of each type 'claiming' better spots for themselves. Applications of this theory include cancer generation and biofilm dynamics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31409235
doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0781
pmc: PMC6731496
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20180781Références
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2000 Dec;24(5):661-71
pubmed: 11077157
Theor Popul Biol. 2000 Nov;58(3):211-37
pubmed: 11120650
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2001 Oct;4(5):582-5
pubmed: 11587936
Nature. 2002 May 23;417(6887):437-40
pubmed: 12024212
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004 Feb;2(2):95-108
pubmed: 15040259
Nature. 2005 Jan 20;433(7023):312-6
pubmed: 15662424
Genetics. 2005 Nov;171(3):1407-17
pubmed: 16118199
Science. 2005 Sep 23;309(5743):2075-8
pubmed: 16123265
Phys Rev Lett. 2005 Aug 26;95(9):098104
pubmed: 16197256
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jan 7;273(1582):51-5
pubmed: 16519234
PLoS Comput Biol. 2006 Oct 20;2(10):e140
pubmed: 17054392
Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97-159
pubmed: 17246615
Ecol Lett. 2007 Feb;10(2):95-104
pubmed: 17257097
Cancer Res. 2007 Aug 15;67(16):7646-53
pubmed: 17699769
Genet Res. 1991 Dec;58(3):243-51
pubmed: 1802806
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008 Mar;6(3):199-210
pubmed: 18264116
Gene Ther. 2008 May;15(10):730-8
pubmed: 18401438
Nature. 2008 Jul 10;454(7201):213-6
pubmed: 18615084
Biotechnol Bioeng. 1994 May;43(11):1131-8
pubmed: 18615526
J R Soc Interface. 2008 Nov 6;5(28):1279-89
pubmed: 18664425
Biol Direct. 2010 Apr 20;5:21
pubmed: 20406439
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2010 Jul;20(3):156-63
pubmed: 20685578
J Evol Biol. 2011 Nov;24(11):2299-309
pubmed: 21939465
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 26;110(9):3229-36
pubmed: 23391737
Phys Rev Lett. 2013 Dec 6;111(23):238101
pubmed: 24476306
J R Soc Interface. 2014 Mar 26;11(95):20140014
pubmed: 24671934
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Apr 24;10(4):e1003567
pubmed: 24762474
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 13;111(19):E1940-9
pubmed: 24763688
J R Soc Interface. 2014 Nov 6;11(100):20140663
pubmed: 25165604
Ecol Lett. 2015 Jun;18(6):572-80
pubmed: 25903067
R Soc Open Sci. 2015 Apr 29;2(4):140465
pubmed: 26064637
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 8;112(36):E5021-8
pubmed: 26305937
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2015 Aug;92(2):022722
pubmed: 26382447
Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 19;5:15211
pubmed: 26477392
Lab Chip. 2016 Jul 5;16(14):2618-25
pubmed: 27302471
J Theor Biol. 2016 Nov 21;409:155-164
pubmed: 27565247
J Theor Biol. 2017 Jan 21;413:1-10
pubmed: 27840127
Evolution. 1981 May;35(3):468-476
pubmed: 28563590
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 12;7(1):5193
pubmed: 28701726
Evol Appl. 2017 Oct 12;10(10):1121-1129
pubmed: 29151865
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Nov 27;13(11):e1005864
pubmed: 29176825
J Theor Biol. 2018 Mar 14;441:84-92
pubmed: 29330057
Genetics. 1973 Apr;73:Suppl 73:1-18
pubmed: 4711556
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Apr;62(4):1056-60
pubmed: 5256406
Nature. 1968 Feb 17;217(5129):624-6
pubmed: 5637732
J Theor Biol. 1981 May 21;90(2):213-39
pubmed: 7311579
J Math Biol. 1980 Apr;9(2):101-14
pubmed: 7365330
Annu Rev Genet. 1976;10:253-80
pubmed: 797310