Reliability and Recalibration of the Persian Version of Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool Cut-off Score in Athletes with Functional Ankle Instability.

Ankle Injuries Athletes Joint Instability Patient Acuity Reproducibility of Results

Journal

Advanced journal of emergency medicine
ISSN: 2588-400X
Titre abrégé: Adv J Emerg Med
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101745107

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
entrez: 15 8 2019
pubmed: 15 8 2019
medline: 15 8 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) is a valid instrument for determining the presence and severity of functional ankle instability. This questionnaire was recently cross-culturally adapted into Persian; however, the reliability of the Persian version has not been examined in athletes. CAIT has also been used with various independently-selected cut-off scores to determine instability. The present study was conducted to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of CAIT and to determine its optimal cut-off score in athletic populations. One-hundred and sixteen athletes (volleyball, basketball and track and field players) over 18 years old both with and without ankle instability completed the Persian version of the CAIT. The internal consistency, test-retest reliability and discriminative ability of the tool were assessed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to confirm the cut-off point of the Persian version of CAIT using the Youden index. The average CAIT score was 25.14±4.98 for the right and 25.76±4.94 for the left ankle. The Persian version of CAIT had a good internal consistency (Cronbach's α of 0.78 for the right ankle and 0.79 for the left ankle) and substantial reliability (ICC The Persian version of CAIT was shown to be a reliable tool for assessing functional ankle instability among Iranian athletes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31410403
doi: 10.22114/ajem.v0i0.180
pii: AJEM-3-e26
pmc: PMC6683592
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e26

Références

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Sep;87(9):1235-41
pubmed: 16935061
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42
pubmed: 17161752
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 May;39(5):781-7
pubmed: 17468574
Clin J Sport Med. 2007 Jul;17(4):269-75
pubmed: 17620780
Aust J Physiother. 2007;53(3):193-8
pubmed: 17725477
Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(26):1959-65
pubmed: 18720109
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Dec;38(12):782-9
pubmed: 19047770
Foot Ankle Spec. 2008 Dec;1(6):330-7
pubmed: 19825736
J Athl Train. 2011 Nov-Dec;46(6):634-41
pubmed: 22488189
Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Jan;32(1):91-8
pubmed: 23053687
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Jul;48(13):1014-8
pubmed: 24255768
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Oct;95(10):1853-9
pubmed: 24814563
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jul;27(7):2087-90
pubmed: 26311931
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jan;39(1):50-58
pubmed: 26878332
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Aug;39(16):1644-1649
pubmed: 27416105

Auteurs

Maryam Mirshahi (M)

Sports Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Farzin Halabchi (F)

Sports Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Sports and Exercise Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Mohammadreza Golbakhsh (M)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Soheil Saadat (S)

Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Classifications MeSH