Reporting stAndards for research in PedIatric Dentistry (RAPID): A development protocol.
Delphi
Paediatric Dentistry
Reporting stAndards for research in PedIatric Dentistry (RAPID)
guidelines
protocol
reporting
standards
Journal
International journal of paediatric dentistry
ISSN: 1365-263X
Titre abrégé: Int J Paediatr Dent
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9107511
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
28
05
2019
revised:
16
06
2019
accepted:
08
08
2019
pubmed:
15
8
2019
medline:
24
12
2019
entrez:
15
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Reporting guidelines can improve the quality of reports of research findings. Some specialities in health care however require guidance on areas that are not captured within the existing guidelines, and this is the case for Paediatric Dentistry where no such standards are available to guide the reporting of different types of study designs. The 'Reporting stAndards for research in PedIatric Dentistry' (RAPID) group aims to address this need by developing guidelines on reporting elements of research of particular relevance to Paediatric Dentistry. The development of RAPID guidelines will involve a five-phase process including a Delphi study, which is an explicit consensus development method designed and implemented in accordance with the Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies. The guideline development process will be overseen by an Executive Group. Themes specific to areas in Paediatric Dentistry will be selected, and items to be included under each theme will be identified by members of the Executive Group reviewing at least five reports of experimental and analytical study types using existing reporting guidelines. For the Delphi study, the Executive Group will identify an international multidisciplinary RAPID Delphi Group (RDG) of approximately 60 participants including academics, Paediatric Dentists, parents, and other stakeholders. Each item will be evaluated by RDG on clarity using a dichotomous scale ('well phrased' or 'needs revision') and on suitability for inclusion in the Delphi study using a 9-point Likert scale (1 = 'definitely not include' to 9 = 'definitely include'). The items will then be included in an online Delphi study of up to four rounds, with participants invited from stakeholder groups across Paediatric Dentistry. Items scored 7 or above by at least 80% of respondents will be included in the checklist and further discussed in a face-to-face Delphi consensus meeting. Following this, the Executive Group will finalize the RAPID guidelines. The guidelines will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and disseminated at scientific meetings and conferences. All the outputs from this project will be made freely available on the RAPID website: www.rapid-statement.org.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
96-103Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0901530
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2019 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Sackett DL. Evidence-based medicine. Semin Perinatol. 1997;21:3-5.
Chiappelli F. Evidence-based dentistry: two decades and beyond. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2019;19:7-16.
Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet. 2014;383:156-165.
Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, et al. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet. 2014;383:267-276.
Moher D, Pham BA', Jones A, et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet. 1998;352:609-613.
Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, et al. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:MR000030.
Carneiro NC, Prado HV, Almeida TD, Pordeus IA, Borges-Oliveira AC, Martins CC. A survey of dental journal methodological practices: Reporting guidelines and ethical policies. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018;149:1057-1064.
Sandhu SS, Sandhu J, Kaur H. Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in orthodontics - what affects it and did it improve over the last 10 years? Eur J Orthod. 2015;37:356-366.
Nagendrababu V, Pulikkotil SJ, Sultan OS, Jayaraman J, Peters OA. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in endodontics. J Endod. 2018;44:903-913.
Bassani R, Pereira GK, Page MJ, Tricco AC, Moher D, Sarkis-Onofre R. Systematic reviews in dentistry: Current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics. J Dent. 2019;82:71-84.
Stewart LA, Clarke M, Rovers M, et al. Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data the PRISMA-IPD statement. J Am Dent Assoc. 2015;313:1657-1665.
Hopewell S, Clarke M, Moher D, et al. CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts. Lancet. 2008;371:281-283.
Fitchett E, Seale AC, Vergnano S, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology for newborn infection (STROBE-NI): an extension of the STROBE statement for neonatal infection research. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:e202-e213.
Legro RS, Wu X, Barnhart KT, et al. Improving the reporting of clinical trials of infertility treatments (IMPRINT): modifying the CONSORT statement. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:2075-2082.
MacPherson H, Altman DG, Hammerschlag R, et al. STRICTA Revision Group. Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement. PLoS Medicine. 2010;7:e1000261.
Nagendrababu V, Chong B, McCabe PS, et al. Guidelines for reporting the quality of clinical case reports in Endodontics: a development protocol. Int Endod J. 2018;52:775-778.
Nagendrababu V, Duncan HF, Bjørndal L, et al. Preferred Reporting Items for RAndomized Trials in Endodontics (PRIRATE) guidelines: a development protocol. Int Endod J. 2019;52(7):974-978. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13087.
Nagendrababu V, Murray PE, Ordinola-Zapata R, et al. A protocol for developing reporting guidelines for laboratory studies in Endodontology. Int Endod J. 2019;52(8):1090-1095. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13123.
Kapadia MZ, Askie L, Hartling L, et al. PRISMA-Children (C) and PRISMA-Protocol for Children (PC) Extensions: a study protocol for the development of guidelines for the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of newborn and child health research. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010270.
Clyburne-Sherin AV, Thurairajah P, Kapadia MZ, Sampson M, Chan WW, Offringa M. Recommendations and evidence for reporting items in pediatric clinical trial protocols and reports: two systematic reviews. Trials. 2015;16:417.
Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009;374:86-89.
Harron K. Using reporting guidelines to publish paediatric research. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102:401-402.
Khare M, Suprabha BS, Shenoy R, Rao A. Evaluation of pit-and-fissure sealants placed with four different bonding protocols: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Paed Dent. 2017;27:444-453.
Taran PK, Kaya MS. A comparison of periodontal health in primary molars restored with prefabricated stainless steel and zirconia crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2018;40:334-339.
Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, Altman DG. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Medicine. 2010;7:e1000217.
Junger S, Payne SA, Brine J, Radbruch L, Brearley SG. Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med. 2017;31:684-706.
Enhancing the quality and transparency of health research. www.equator-network.org Accessed May 21, 2019.
Agha RA, Borrelli MR, Vella-Baldacchino M, et al. The STROCSS statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery. Int J Surg. 2017;46:198-202.
Murphy MK. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2:1-88.
Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, et al. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case report guideline development. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:46-51.
Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000412.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. Strobe initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Medicine. 2007;4:e296.
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med. 2010;8:18.
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology. 2015;277:826-832.
O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89:1245-1251.
Calvert M, Kyte D, Mercieca-Bebber R, et al. Guidelines for inclusion of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trial protocols: The SPIRIT-PRO Extension. J Am Med Assoc. 2018;319:483-494.
Brouwers MC, Kerkvliet K, Spithoff K. AGREE next steps consortium. The AGREE reporting checklist: a tool to improve reporting of clinical practice guidelines. BMJ. 2016;352:i1152.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.