Action 3:30R: process evaluation of a cluster randomised feasibility study of a revised teaching assistant-led extracurricular physical activity intervention for 8 to 10 year olds.
After-school
Children
Feasibility
Intervention
Physical activity
Process evaluation
RE-AIM
Teaching assistants
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Aug 2019
14 Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
28
01
2019
accepted:
19
07
2019
entrez:
16
8
2019
pubmed:
16
8
2019
medline:
15
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Numerous interventions to increase children's physical activity levels are published, yet, few studies report indicators of external validity. Process evaluations are critical for assessing intervention implementation, sustainability and effectiveness. A mixed-methods process evaluation, using the RE-AIM framework, was conducted to evaluate the internal and external validity of Action 3:30R, a revised teaching assistant-led after-school intervention which aimed to increase physical activity in children aged 8-10 years and was underpinned by Self-determination Theory (SDT). Data were collected and reported in line with the five components of RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance). Quantitative measures included logbooks, registers and self-reported teaching-efficacy, autonomy support, child enjoyment and perceived exertion questionnaires. Questionnaire data were collected at three points throughout the 15-week intervention. Observations by trained researchers were also conducted to assess fidelity to the intervention manual and its underpinning theory. Post-intervention focus groups with pupils and interviews with teaching assistants (TAs), school staff and external stakeholders explored the implementation and potential sustainability of Action 3:30R from stakeholders' perspectives. Action 3:30R appealed to a broad range of pupils, including girls and less-active pupils. The Action 3:30R TA training was implemented as intended and was perceived as valuable professional development. Releasing staff for training was a barrier in two of the six intervention schools, which were unable to deliver the intervention as a result. Pupils enjoyed the intervention, and the Action 3:30R core principles underpinned by SDT were implemented with high fidelity, as was the intervention itself. Scheduling conflicts with other clubs and lack of parental support were perceived as the main barriers to recruitment and attendance. Lack of space and season were cited as the main barriers affecting the quality of delivery. The study shows evidence of maintenance, as one intervention school decided to continue Action 3:30R beyond the study. Funding and continued TA training were suggested as factors which may affect the maintenance of Action 3:30R. Action 3:30R is an enjoyable, autonomy-supportive after-school programme, which engages a range of pupils and offers TAs valuable training. RE-AIM provided helpful structure and is recommended for intervention evaluations. ISRCTN34001941 . Prospectively registered 01/12/2016.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Numerous interventions to increase children's physical activity levels are published, yet, few studies report indicators of external validity. Process evaluations are critical for assessing intervention implementation, sustainability and effectiveness. A mixed-methods process evaluation, using the RE-AIM framework, was conducted to evaluate the internal and external validity of Action 3:30R, a revised teaching assistant-led after-school intervention which aimed to increase physical activity in children aged 8-10 years and was underpinned by Self-determination Theory (SDT).
METHODS
METHODS
Data were collected and reported in line with the five components of RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance). Quantitative measures included logbooks, registers and self-reported teaching-efficacy, autonomy support, child enjoyment and perceived exertion questionnaires. Questionnaire data were collected at three points throughout the 15-week intervention. Observations by trained researchers were also conducted to assess fidelity to the intervention manual and its underpinning theory. Post-intervention focus groups with pupils and interviews with teaching assistants (TAs), school staff and external stakeholders explored the implementation and potential sustainability of Action 3:30R from stakeholders' perspectives.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Action 3:30R appealed to a broad range of pupils, including girls and less-active pupils. The Action 3:30R TA training was implemented as intended and was perceived as valuable professional development. Releasing staff for training was a barrier in two of the six intervention schools, which were unable to deliver the intervention as a result. Pupils enjoyed the intervention, and the Action 3:30R core principles underpinned by SDT were implemented with high fidelity, as was the intervention itself. Scheduling conflicts with other clubs and lack of parental support were perceived as the main barriers to recruitment and attendance. Lack of space and season were cited as the main barriers affecting the quality of delivery. The study shows evidence of maintenance, as one intervention school decided to continue Action 3:30R beyond the study. Funding and continued TA training were suggested as factors which may affect the maintenance of Action 3:30R.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Action 3:30R is an enjoyable, autonomy-supportive after-school programme, which engages a range of pupils and offers TAs valuable training. RE-AIM provided helpful structure and is recommended for intervention evaluations.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ISRCTN34001941 . Prospectively registered 01/12/2016.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31412818
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7347-3
pii: 10.1186/s12889-019-7347-3
pmc: PMC6694632
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1111Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/J000191/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : PHR/15/55/09
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Public Health Research Programme
ID : 15/55/09
Références
Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7
pubmed: 10474547
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867
J Sports Sci. 2001 Jul;19(7):527-35
pubmed: 11461056
Ann Behav Med. 2004 Feb;27(1):3-12
pubmed: 14979858
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Dec;55(3):407-15
pubmed: 15582347
Acta Paediatr. 2005 Dec;94(12):1791-7
pubmed: 16421041
Circulation. 2006 Sep 12;114(11):1214-24
pubmed: 16908770
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 Jul 28;7:59
pubmed: 20663226
BMJ. 2012 Sep 27;345:e5888
pubmed: 23044984
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 21;3(8):e002893
pubmed: 23965931
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Feb;68(2):101-2
pubmed: 24022816
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Sep 11;11:114
pubmed: 25209323
Public Health. 2015 Apr;129(4):377-84
pubmed: 25707931
BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 18;15:156
pubmed: 25879810
Nurs Res. 2015 May-Jun;64(3):190-9
pubmed: 25932698
Prev Med. 2016 Jan;82:8-19
pubmed: 26582207
Health Educ Res. 2016 Apr;31(2):220-33
pubmed: 27004906
Sports Med. 2017 Jan;47(1):135-161
pubmed: 27294354
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Apr 28;14(1):33
pubmed: 28449679
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Dec 6;3:69
pubmed: 29225913
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 13;18(1):177
pubmed: 29534729
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 06;16(1):
pubmed: 30621326
Obes Rev. 2019 Jun;20(6):859-870
pubmed: 30628172