Clinical utility of ramucirumab in non-small-cell lung cancer.
NSCLC
non-small-cell lung cancer
ramucirumab
Journal
Biologics : targets & therapy
ISSN: 1177-5475
Titre abrégé: Biologics
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101321511
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
04
03
2019
accepted:
06
07
2019
entrez:
16
8
2019
pubmed:
16
8
2019
medline:
16
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 85% of all lung cancer cases and approximately 70% of patients with NSCLC have locally advanced or metastatic disease at presentation. In NSCLC patients with advanced or metastatic disease, second line treatment with chemotherapy is associated with a poor response rate. In this article, we have reviewed the role of ramucirumab in patients with NSCLC. Ramucirumab is not current standard of care in the first line setting in the treatment of advanced or metastatic NSCLC, based on phase II data which did not show any progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit when ramucirumab was compared with non-ramucirumab arm. The REVEL study was a phase III, placebo-controlled trial which included patients with stage IV NSCLC who had progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab. Median OS was 9.1 months vs 10.5 months (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.98) in the placebo and ramucirumab group respectively. Seventy-nine percent of patients in ramucirumab arm and 71% of patients in non-ramucirumab arm had grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events. The addition of ramucirumab to docetaxel can be considered in younger patients with good performance status as a second line treatment option. Additionally, combined blockage of the VEGFR and EGFR pathway has been utilized to overcome resistance to EGFR therapy. The RELAY trial was a phase III, placebo-controlled trial which included patients with sensitizing EGFR mutation positive stage IV NSCLC. Patients were randomized to either ramucirumab plus erlotinib or erlotinib. The trial showed that the combination therapy showed superior PFS benefit.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31413541
doi: 10.2147/BTT.S175034
pii: 175034
pmc: PMC6659776
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
133-137Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author reports no conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Nature. 1993 Apr 29;362(6423):841-4
pubmed: 7683111
Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1540-1550
pubmed: 26712084
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Jul 15;16(14):3548-61
pubmed: 20606037
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 22;379(21):2040-2051
pubmed: 30280635
Lancet. 2014 Jan 4;383(9911):31-39
pubmed: 24094768
Clin Lung Cancer. 2018 Nov;19(6):e871-e874
pubmed: 30197264
Ann Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;30(2):171-210
pubmed: 30596843
J Clin Oncol. 2000 May;18(10):2095-103
pubmed: 10811675
Lancet. 2014 Aug 23;384(9944):665-73
pubmed: 24933332
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 31;378(22):2078-2092
pubmed: 29658856
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):143-55
pubmed: 24411639
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):123-35
pubmed: 26028407
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 May 15;15(10):3484-94
pubmed: 19447865
J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 1;22(9):1589-97
pubmed: 15117980
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 14;378(24):2288-2301
pubmed: 29863955
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 10;28(5):780-7
pubmed: 20048182
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1823-1833
pubmed: 27718847
Thorac Cancer. 2019 Apr;10(4):775-781
pubmed: 30809973
Eur J Cancer. 2020 May;131:27-36
pubmed: 32276179
Nat Med. 1997 Nov;3(11):1222-7
pubmed: 9359696
Lancet. 2017 Jan 21;389(10066):255-265
pubmed: 27979383
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1627-39
pubmed: 26412456
J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Oct;9(10):1532-9
pubmed: 25170639
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Oct;15(11):1224-35
pubmed: 25240821
Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 May;83(5):584-94
pubmed: 18452692
Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 Mar;83(3):355-67
pubmed: 18316005
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Cancer. 2015 Mar 15;121(6):883-92
pubmed: 25377507
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1998 Jun;17(2):155-61
pubmed: 9770111