"Strong Teeth"-a study protocol for an early-phase feasibility trial of a complex oral health intervention delivered by dental teams to parents of young children.
Complex intervention
Decay
Dental team
Diet
Electric toothbrush
General dental practice
Oral health behaviour change
Parental supervised toothbrushing
Parents
Young children
Journal
Pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN: 2055-5784
Titre abrégé: Pilot Feasibility Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676536
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
21
02
2019
accepted:
29
07
2019
entrez:
16
8
2019
pubmed:
16
8
2019
medline:
16
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dental attendance provides an important opportunity for dental teams to explore with parents the oral health behaviours they undertake for their young children (0-5 years old). For these discussions to be effective, dental professionals need to be skilled in behaviour change conversations. The current evidence suggests that dental teams need further support, training and resources in this area. Therefore, the University of Leeds and Oral-B (Procter & Gamble Company) have worked with the local community and dental professionals to co-develop "Strong Teeth" (an oral health intervention), which is delivered in a general dental practice setting by the whole dental team. The protocol for this early phase study will explore the feasibility and acceptability of the Strong Teeth intervention to parents and the dental team, as well as explore short-term changes in oral health behaviour. Forty parents (20 of children aged 0-2 years old, and 20 of children aged 3-5 years old) who are about to attend the dentist for their child's regular dental check-up will be recruited to the study. Parents and children will be recruited from 4 to 8 different dental practices. In the home setting, consent and baseline oral health behaviour data will be collected. The researchers will ask parents questions about their child's oral health behaviours, including toothbrushing and diet. Three different proxy objective measures of toothbrushing will be collected and compared with self-report measures of parental supervised toothbrushing (PSB). The parent and child will then attend their dental visit and receive the Strong Teeth intervention, delivered by the dental team. This intervention should take 5-15 min to be delivered, in addition to the routine dental check-up. Furthermore, children aged 0-2 years old will receive an Oral-B manual children's toothbrush, and children aged 3-5 years old will receive an Oral-B electric rechargeable children's toothbrush. At 2 weeks and 2-3 months following the Strong Teeth intervention, further self-report and objective measures will be collected in the parent/child's home. This data will be supplemented with purposively sampled qualitative interviews with parents (approximately 3 months following the intervention) and dental team members (following delivery of the intervention). ISRCTN Register, (ISRCTN10709150).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Dental attendance provides an important opportunity for dental teams to explore with parents the oral health behaviours they undertake for their young children (0-5 years old). For these discussions to be effective, dental professionals need to be skilled in behaviour change conversations. The current evidence suggests that dental teams need further support, training and resources in this area. Therefore, the University of Leeds and Oral-B (Procter & Gamble Company) have worked with the local community and dental professionals to co-develop "Strong Teeth" (an oral health intervention), which is delivered in a general dental practice setting by the whole dental team. The protocol for this early phase study will explore the feasibility and acceptability of the Strong Teeth intervention to parents and the dental team, as well as explore short-term changes in oral health behaviour.
METHODS
METHODS
Forty parents (20 of children aged 0-2 years old, and 20 of children aged 3-5 years old) who are about to attend the dentist for their child's regular dental check-up will be recruited to the study. Parents and children will be recruited from 4 to 8 different dental practices. In the home setting, consent and baseline oral health behaviour data will be collected. The researchers will ask parents questions about their child's oral health behaviours, including toothbrushing and diet. Three different proxy objective measures of toothbrushing will be collected and compared with self-report measures of parental supervised toothbrushing (PSB).
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
The parent and child will then attend their dental visit and receive the Strong Teeth intervention, delivered by the dental team. This intervention should take 5-15 min to be delivered, in addition to the routine dental check-up. Furthermore, children aged 0-2 years old will receive an Oral-B manual children's toothbrush, and children aged 3-5 years old will receive an Oral-B electric rechargeable children's toothbrush. At 2 weeks and 2-3 months following the Strong Teeth intervention, further self-report and objective measures will be collected in the parent/child's home. This data will be supplemented with purposively sampled qualitative interviews with parents (approximately 3 months following the intervention) and dental team members (following delivery of the intervention).
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ISRCTN Register, (ISRCTN10709150).
Identifiants
pubmed: 31413863
doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0483-9
pii: 483
pmc: PMC6691530
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsPD, KG-B and JO have received modest fees to speak to professional audiences about the Strong Teeth project. They have no other competing interests. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
J Am Dent Assoc. 1964 Jan;68:7-13
pubmed: 14076341
J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12
pubmed: 15189396
Caries Res. 2005 Jan-Feb;39(1):27-33
pubmed: 15591731
Public Health Nutr. 2006 Jun;9(4):501-8
pubmed: 16870023
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Apr;142(4):415-26
pubmed: 21454848
J Public Health Dent. 2011 Winter;71 Suppl 1:S69-79
pubmed: 21656958
Psychol Health Med. 2011 Aug;16(4):484-9
pubmed: 21749245
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37
pubmed: 22530986
BMC Oral Health. 2013 Jun 01;13:24
pubmed: 23725221
Community Dent Health. 2014 Jun;31(2):75-9
pubmed: 25055603
BMC Oral Health. 2015 Apr 09;15:45
pubmed: 25888427
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016 May;26(3):184-92
pubmed: 26148197
BMC Oral Health. 2015 Nov 10;15:141
pubmed: 26597279
Implement Sci. 2016 May 06;11:61
pubmed: 27153832
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Sep;20(71):1-96
pubmed: 27685609
Br Dent J. 2016 Dec 16;221(12):777-784
pubmed: 27981972
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):88
pubmed: 28126032
J Dent Res. 2017 Jul;96(7):762-767
pubmed: 28571506
Br Dent J. 2017 Jun 23;222(12):937-943
pubmed: 28642506
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2016 Jul;1(2):122-130
pubmed: 28879241
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Mar 27;4:68
pubmed: 29610675
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Feb 21;19(1):35
pubmed: 30791896
Community Dent Health. 1997 Mar;14 Suppl 1:6-9
pubmed: 9114553
Community Dent Health. 1997 Mar;14 Suppl 1:18-29
pubmed: 9114555