Visual working memory load does not eliminate visuomotor repetition effects.
Memory: visual working and short-term memory
Repetition effects
Visual working memory
Journal
Attention, perception & psychophysics
ISSN: 1943-393X
Titre abrégé: Atten Percept Psychophys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101495384
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
16
8
2019
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
16
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
When we respond to a stimulus, our ability to quickly execute this response depends on how combinations of stimulus and response features match to previous combinations of stimulus and response features. Some kind of memory representations must be underlying these visuomotor repetition effects. In this paper, we tested the hypothesis that visual working memory stores the stimulus information that gives rise to these effects. Participants discriminated the colors of successive stimuli while holding either three locations or colors in visual working memory. If visual working memory maintains the information about a previous event that leads to visuomotor repetition effects, then occupying working memory with colors or locations should selectively disrupt color-response and location-response repetition effects. The results of two experiments showed that neither color nor spatial memory load eliminated visuomotor repetition effects. Since working memory load did not disrupt repetition effects, it is unlikely that visual working memory resources are used to store the information that underlies visuomotor repetitions effects. Instead, these results are consistent with the view that visuomotor repetition effects stem from automatic long-term memory retrieval, but can also be accommodated by supposing separate buffers for visual working memory and response selection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31414365
doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01839-9
pii: 10.3758/s13414-019-01839-9
pmc: PMC7018594
mid: NIHMS1537525
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1290-1303Subventions
Organisme : Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
ID : 194537
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01-MH110378
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : P30 EY008126
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : R01 EY019882
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH110378
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : R01 EY025275
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : R01-EY02575
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : R01-EY02575
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01-MH110378
Pays : United States
Références
Psychol Res. 2014 Jul;78(4):520-38
pubmed: 23884516
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Jul;18(7):376-84
pubmed: 24768034
Mem Cognit. 1973 Mar;1(1):85-90
pubmed: 24214483
Psychol Rev. 1990 Oct;97(4):523-47
pubmed: 2247540
J Vis. 2013 Aug 02;13(3):
pubmed: 23912066
Cogn Psychol. 1992 Apr;24(2):175-219
pubmed: 1582172
Mem Cognit. 1994 Nov;22(6):657-72
pubmed: 7808275
Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28;139(1):23-38
pubmed: 16324795
Cogn Psychol. 2016 Dec;91:82-108
pubmed: 27821256
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Apr;79(3):807-819
pubmed: 28063136
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Jun;32(3):705-16
pubmed: 16822133
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Jul;71(5):1059-71
pubmed: 19525537
Vision Res. 1996 Jul;36(14):2125-40
pubmed: 8776479
Vision Res. 2011 Jan;51(1):147-53
pubmed: 20974166
Cogn Psychol. 2003 Jun;46(4):361-413
pubmed: 12809680
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Oct;31(5):1067-82
pubmed: 16262499
Mem Cognit. 2008 Jan;36(1):43-52
pubmed: 18323061
Percept Psychophys. 2002 Feb;64(2):292-317
pubmed: 12013382
Percept Psychophys. 2003 Aug;65(6):970-81
pubmed: 14528903
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Oct;81(7):2139-2154
pubmed: 31168699
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Apr;22(2):453-60
pubmed: 25134470
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Apr;18(2):324-30
pubmed: 21331668
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Apr;11(2):269-74
pubmed: 15260192
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1999 Dec;103(3):295-310
pubmed: 10668302
Nature. 1997 Nov 20;390(6657):279-81
pubmed: 9384378
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun;20(3):514-21
pubmed: 23325704
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2006 Dec;12(4):207-22
pubmed: 17154770
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Nov;8(11):494-500
pubmed: 15491903
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Nov;79(8):2590-2605
pubmed: 28752283
Psychol Res. 2013 May;77(3):249-59
pubmed: 22526717
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Sep;17 Suppl 1:i118-24
pubmed: 17725994
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(5):1006-33
pubmed: 22332900
Psychol Res. 2018 Sep;82(5):833-839
pubmed: 28405777
Psychol Res. 2004 Feb;68(1):1-17
pubmed: 14752663
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Apr;21(2):418-24
pubmed: 24002966
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 May;79(4):1012-1026
pubmed: 28176214
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Jan;43(1):1-22
pubmed: 27685018
Cogn Psychol. 2011 May;62(3):193-222
pubmed: 21293788
Psychol Sci. 2018 Mar;29(3):328-339
pubmed: 29298120
Vis cogn. 2012 Jan 13;20(1):1-28
pubmed: 22287933
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr;26(2):506-514
pubmed: 30796630
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Dec;59(12):2135-47
pubmed: 17095492
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2003 Feb;112(2):143-56
pubmed: 12521664
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 May;31(3):482-95
pubmed: 15910132
PLoS One. 2008 Jul 23;3(7):e2716
pubmed: 18648493
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Apr;21(2):549-56
pubmed: 24002967